G35 sedan stock VS Camaro SS L99 Auto on the track rnd 2
05-12-2013, 03:26 PM
#26
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 04-16-09
Location: moore
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dude the car was owned previously by his dad. You really think a 40-50 year old guy is going to tear apart his nice 4 door luxury car?
05-12-2013, 03:32 PM
#27
Senior Member
Well then its settled his car is magical. He is able to out run bolted and tuned cars not to mention cars that are lighter in better track conditions. He better keep that thing.
05-12-2013, 03:35 PM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had a few races last night
I lost to a bolt on is350 by about a car length, an intake/exhaust/tune g8 gt by 2-3 cars or so. I also lost to an srt4 caliber that traps 105+ in the 1/4 mile(a car length or so to 100 but he was slowly pulling away still from 40 roll); however we did a 20 roll after and I beat him... he is lowered all the way and just spun like crazy.
I raced a 3v with intake/tune and 4.10s from a dig twice... He got a car length ahead but past 100 I reeled him in and fendered him out. The second run he had tcs off and spun and I won.
I also beat full bolt on tuned Genesis 2.0t from a roll and dig pretty easily. Oh beat a stock g8 gt too.
If it had unicorn fuel it would never lose.
Bolt ons do next to nothing for a 5at hr g35 btw, you should know that. If I had a tune I would trap more then 101-102 mph, if I had gears I would not be able to go through 1/4 mile redlining 3rd.
Last edited by MillerCycle; 05-12-2013 at 03:44 PM.
05-12-2013, 03:54 PM
#29
Senior Member
Bolt on's do plenty to a HR now I know you don't know what the **** you are talking about. Injen long intakes, dual exhaust, high flow cats and a tune get 300whp. That is a 35-40whp gain.
05-12-2013, 07:38 PM
#30
Junior Member
Join Date: 05-16-07
Location: Blandon, PA
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The fail part is assuming that the SS/TC is a low mid 13 second car. If less than ten have achieved it on this board and most of the drag times listing are not even cracking 14's Bone stock then it's really not a mid-low 3 second car for most people cause they lack the driving skill! It's FASTER than a stock SS/TC in the quarter mile except for a few Amazing driver's that have gone from 13.8-13.5! Which most of those fast times are on this board. so less than ten people have done and there are how many SS/TC's out there? In reality it's a fraction of a single percent of people who have cracked 13's in any form verses the amount of cars produced! And i pulled a fail? 
05-12-2013, 09:36 PM
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-19-10
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the biggest issue is this (getting past all the bullshit bench talk about what a specific car can do -
The L99 Camaro in this vid SHOULD be able to run around 13.1-13.5 if its half of what any fifth gen should be. I see L99's kissing 13 flat with nothing more than better tires and a guy who know's the difference between a gas pedal and a floor board. Yes, sitting before the lights doesn't matter, but if this guy is as lame about going when he's supposed to, he's probably just as foolish about running a 1/4 mile in general.
I don't want to get into OP's G35 and what its capable of. He's clearly good enough at the track and his car proves itself, unicorn juice or no. As far as 'beating an L99', I think he's just been lucky in what caliber driver he's been meeting in the opposing lane. Good for him on that one - there's more than enough fifth gen owners out there in need of a rectification.
The L99 Camaro in this vid SHOULD be able to run around 13.1-13.5 if its half of what any fifth gen should be. I see L99's kissing 13 flat with nothing more than better tires and a guy who know's the difference between a gas pedal and a floor board. Yes, sitting before the lights doesn't matter, but if this guy is as lame about going when he's supposed to, he's probably just as foolish about running a 1/4 mile in general.
I don't want to get into OP's G35 and what its capable of. He's clearly good enough at the track and his car proves itself, unicorn juice or no. As far as 'beating an L99', I think he's just been lucky in what caliber driver he's been meeting in the opposing lane. Good for him on that one - there's more than enough fifth gen owners out there in need of a rectification.
05-13-2013, 06:03 PM
#37
Well that didnt take long for this thread to get **** on.FYI he never said he beat the camaro in this thrread or that he was faster than it. Secondly Im pretty he has posted a slip before of his 13.6 pass; if not he willl again. it was a cold day and the DA was low just like u say it has to be. i believe it was like 40-45 degrees that day they were going to close the track hadnt it been for a camera crew being there shooting a documentary show.
05-13-2013, 06:05 PM
#38
Uh.. nowhere in this thread did anyone say a ss/tc did mid to low 13's stock. YOU DID. THAT my friend is the fail. Your also taking amazingly great times for the G35 *NOTE* some of the best ever posted (grats miller)... and comparing it to poorly driven ss/tc times. A decent run for a ss/tc is right in that ballpark. Why did you even make this a pissing match between the two cars? This is a Camaro vs G35 thread.
05-13-2013, 06:39 PM
#40
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 04-16-09
Location: moore
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no actually I posted it because I said in the other thread I would to prove people wrong and people still think its BS or vodoo magic.
05-14-2013, 03:31 AM
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks.... I don't have an an inflated ego by these races. I have lost to more then a few 5th gen Camaro SS's in the real world, my friend's automatic SS did 13.0 @ 108 with just an aggressive tuner and intake; his is the fastest bolt on 5th gen I have ever seen at our track... If that says anything. People at our local car meets call it a factory freak for being that fast.
05-14-2013, 03:34 AM
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Says a guy who has never gone down the 1/4 mile in his current car. The 350z guy is also comparing a 5-speed auto with factory 3.69 gears versus his 6-speed manual, I like how he ignored my comment about the only 200 lb lighter(then my g35) STOCK 350z nismo doing 13.1 @ 108 mph(he knows which one I speak of). In his bench racing world, everything is a given.... if it agrees with his opinion(the nismo that ran 13.1 stock doesn't).
Last edited by MillerCycle; 05-14-2013 at 05:21 AM.
05-14-2013, 07:43 AM
#43
Says a guy who has never gone down the 1/4 mile in his current car. The 350z guy is also comparing a 5-speed auto with factory 3.69 gears versus his 6-speed manual, I like how he ignored my comment about the only 200 lb lighter(then my g35) STOCK 350z nismo doing 13.1 @ 108 mph(he knows which one I speak of). In his bench racing world, everything is a given.... if it agrees with his opinion(the nismo that ran 13.1 stock doesn't).
Last edited by Vander Nars; 05-14-2013 at 08:20 AM.
05-14-2013, 11:01 AM
#44
Senior Member
Says a guy who has never gone down the 1/4 mile in his current car. The 350z guy is also comparing a 5-speed auto with factory 3.69 gears versus his 6-speed manual, I like how he ignored my comment about the only 200 lb lighter(then my g35) STOCK 350z nismo doing 13.1 @ 108 mph(he knows which one I speak of). In his bench racing world, everything is a given.... if it agrees with his opinion(the nismo that ran 13.1 stock doesn't).
As I have said they have all done it when DA was NEGATIVE. They did it at a track that was close to sea level. When it was COLD out. Like in the 40's. There are no magical numbers being claimed at +800ft by anyone other than you.... I don't dispute times that were run with negative DA, NA cars can and will pick up several 1/10's with beyond excellent density.
You too are ignoring information. Go have a look at the 1st page. I posted a bunch of fast G35 Sedans for you, all of which are slower, with better track conditions, and better 60' times than you and are modded! Oh and they are 5 speed auto's with a 3.7 gears like yours. Somehow your magic car is faster.
Like I said, you should keep it, its magical. Then you need to bring it to a track that is close to sea level, in the fall or winter and go set a world record with it!
Here I'll quote myself just because I know you won't go back a page and look...
The DA was not low on his 13.6 pass. "Hey the DA was 2200 on my 13.8 run and 800 on my 13.6 run"
800 is not low. 0 is low. -200 is low. 800 is slightly better than an average day at a 1000ft track. There is no way his car at sea level is faster than mine at sea level. The laws of physics do not allow it. He claims his is stock.
I know what my car put down on the dyno. I actually had it dyno'd and it is stock. If he is making the same power as me, in a heavier car he is slower. Hands down no two ways about it. Especially if his 60' is worse. His car is not stock. If his G35 is stock then I can claim my 300ZX is stock.
case in point. This guy ran a 13.4 in his G35 sedan he says is stock. However take a look at that DA. -1500 feet. The air was so dense that day it was the equivalent of being 1500 feet below sea level.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Infiniti-G3...lip-23633.html
This fine gentleman ran a 13.58, with a exhaust, intakes and a tune. He destroyed Millers 60' and his DA was also better than by almost 300ft.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Infiniti-G3...lip-17997.html
This young man ran a 13.65 with K&N's and no mufflers. Take a look at his 60'! 1.998! Way better than Millers. Looks to be about 600ft DA. Better than Millers.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Infiniti-G3...lip-14063.html
800 is not low. 0 is low. -200 is low. 800 is slightly better than an average day at a 1000ft track. There is no way his car at sea level is faster than mine at sea level. The laws of physics do not allow it. He claims his is stock.
I know what my car put down on the dyno. I actually had it dyno'd and it is stock. If he is making the same power as me, in a heavier car he is slower. Hands down no two ways about it. Especially if his 60' is worse. His car is not stock. If his G35 is stock then I can claim my 300ZX is stock.
case in point. This guy ran a 13.4 in his G35 sedan he says is stock. However take a look at that DA. -1500 feet. The air was so dense that day it was the equivalent of being 1500 feet below sea level.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Infiniti-G3...lip-23633.html
This fine gentleman ran a 13.58, with a exhaust, intakes and a tune. He destroyed Millers 60' and his DA was also better than by almost 300ft.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Infiniti-G3...lip-17997.html
This young man ran a 13.65 with K&N's and no mufflers. Take a look at his 60'! 1.998! Way better than Millers. Looks to be about 600ft DA. Better than Millers.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Infiniti-G3...lip-14063.html
05-14-2013, 11:26 AM
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-20-11
Location: BFN
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bench racing? You got it wrong bub. I've been down the track in my Z several hundred times. I know what it does. I've had it dyno'd, I know what it makes. I also know about all the other Z's that have run 13.4 and lower.
As I have said they have all done it when DA was NEGATIVE. They did it at a track that was close to sea level. When it was COLD out. Like in the 40's. There are no magical numbers being claimed at +800ft by anyone other than you.... I don't dispute times that were run with negative DA, NA cars can and will pick up several 1/10's with beyond excellent density.
You too are ignoring information. Go have a look at the 1st page. I posted a bunch of fast G35 Sedans for you, all of which are slower, with better track conditions, and better 60' times than you and are modded! Oh and they are 5 speed auto's with a 3.7 gears like yours. Somehow your magic car is faster.
Like I said, you should keep it, its magical. Then you need to bring it to a track that is close to sea level, in the fall or winter and go set a world record with it!
Here I'll quote myself just because I know you won't go back a page and look...
As I have said they have all done it when DA was NEGATIVE. They did it at a track that was close to sea level. When it was COLD out. Like in the 40's. There are no magical numbers being claimed at +800ft by anyone other than you.... I don't dispute times that were run with negative DA, NA cars can and will pick up several 1/10's with beyond excellent density.
You too are ignoring information. Go have a look at the 1st page. I posted a bunch of fast G35 Sedans for you, all of which are slower, with better track conditions, and better 60' times than you and are modded! Oh and they are 5 speed auto's with a 3.7 gears like yours. Somehow your magic car is faster.
Like I said, you should keep it, its magical. Then you need to bring it to a track that is close to sea level, in the fall or winter and go set a world record with it!
Here I'll quote myself just because I know you won't go back a page and look...
Stock 2008 Nissan 350Z Nismo 1/4 mile Drag Racing timeslip specs 0-60 - DragTimes.com
05-14-2013, 12:38 PM
#48
Senior Member
First off, is your car a Nismo Z? No? Oh so you are comparing your car to a lighter car with a manual tranny. Didn't you just try and tell me that was apples to oranges?
Second can you not read? That was ran in Florida, at a track that is almost sea level. In November when the temperatures are cooler. That means the DA is LOW. What are you not understanding about that? Its a simple concept. Low DA's mean denser air. Denser air means more oxygen in the combustion chamber. That equals more power and that equals faster ET's.
The next fastest HR Z ran a 13.2 @ 108. It was ran in December at 46F in Maryland at a track about 200ft above sea level. You see a trend here? You are trying to base your times off of lighter faster cars that are running in way better conditions.
Why don't you stick with the 3 I posted, they are the same car as yours. Only one is faster and the DA that day was so ridiculously low he will likely never repeat those results.
Second can you not read? That was ran in Florida, at a track that is almost sea level. In November when the temperatures are cooler. That means the DA is LOW. What are you not understanding about that? Its a simple concept. Low DA's mean denser air. Denser air means more oxygen in the combustion chamber. That equals more power and that equals faster ET's.
The next fastest HR Z ran a 13.2 @ 108. It was ran in December at 46F in Maryland at a track about 200ft above sea level. You see a trend here? You are trying to base your times off of lighter faster cars that are running in way better conditions.
Why don't you stick with the 3 I posted, they are the same car as yours. Only one is faster and the DA that day was so ridiculously low he will likely never repeat those results.
