Mustang GT Vs Cobalt SS
#51
#52
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: 06-23-09
Location: Chesterfield Missouri
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you truly own a boosted mustang then you should realize that boost levels mean nothing. Its just a measurement of pressure. Matching flow rates would be a closer way. But in the end its still a ricer thing to say. That's like the cobalt saying ok let me add 4 more cylinders.
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-30-11
Location: Cheyenne, WY
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#54
If you truly own a boosted mustang then you should realize that boost levels mean nothing. Its just a measurement of pressure. Matching flow rates would be a closer way. But in the end its still a ricer thing to say. That's like the cobalt saying ok let me add 4 more cylinders.
Sure. They can put in a measly 2v 4.6 in their car too
Last edited by CobaltsLOL; 10-30-2012 at 09:42 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#56
Junior Member
Join Date: 05-16-07
Location: Blandon, PA
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If that really is your car then good for you man. BUT... there still are plenty of cobalts on this site that can match or beat u and get twice the mpg. Each vehicle has its own +/- This is a pissing match that will nvr be settled. But im sure u didnt sign up to this site to make friends. Good luck to you and nice job on your stang. I gotta head out.
#57
If that really is your car then good for you man. BUT... there still are plenty of cobalts on this site that can match or beat u and get twice the mpg. Each vehicle has its own +/- This is a pissing match that will nvr be settled. But im sure u didnt sign up to this site to make friends. Good luck to you and nice job on your stang. I gotta head out.
#58
Junior Member
Join Date: 02-02-10
Location: Parma OH
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL@ you cobalt loving dbags...and i own one... I personally know CobaltsLOL and there aren't may cars on here that can beat his stang I can only think of maybe ten out of the cars on this site. PS our cars will always be FailWheelDrive so we will never win
#60
Senior Member
Join Date: 12-19-10
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#61
Senior Member
205 hp V8 from 1992
215 hp V8 from 1997
260 hp V8 from 2002
300 hp v8 from 2005
Beware of the dime a dozen mustang gts you see everywhere that are gutless and slow, guess this guy put a turbo on his beater? Grats I guess!! This is a cobalt forum, not mod your $3,000 rusted old sub 200 whp v8 forum
For a better comparison lets talk about same year of camaro with the same mods, ohh it would be faster!! :*(
215 hp V8 from 1997
260 hp V8 from 2002
300 hp v8 from 2005
Beware of the dime a dozen mustang gts you see everywhere that are gutless and slow, guess this guy put a turbo on his beater? Grats I guess!! This is a cobalt forum, not mod your $3,000 rusted old sub 200 whp v8 forum
For a better comparison lets talk about same year of camaro with the same mods, ohh it would be faster!! :*(
#62
Junior Member
Join Date: 02-02-10
Location: Parma OH
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
205 hp V8 from 1992
215 hp V8 from 1997
260 hp V8 from 2002
300 hp v8 from 2005
Beware of the dime a dozen mustang gts you see everywhere that are gutless and slow, guess this guy put a turbo on his beater? Grats I guess!! This is a cobalt forum, not mod your $3,000 rusted old sub 200 whp v8 forum
For a better comparison lets talk about same year of camaro with the same mods, ohh it would be faster!! :*(
215 hp V8 from 1997
260 hp V8 from 2002
300 hp v8 from 2005
Beware of the dime a dozen mustang gts you see everywhere that are gutless and slow, guess this guy put a turbo on his beater? Grats I guess!! This is a cobalt forum, not mod your $3,000 rusted old sub 200 whp v8 forum
For a better comparison lets talk about same year of camaro with the same mods, ohh it would be faster!! :*(
i bet your cobalt has more rust on it than his stang and his car is worth more than your balt...
#63
Junior Member
Join Date: 02-02-10
Location: Parma OH
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#64
205 hp V8 from 1992
215 hp V8 from 1997
260 hp V8 from 2002
300 hp v8 from 2005
Beware of the dime a dozen mustang gts you see everywhere that are gutless and slow, guess this guy put a turbo on his beater? Grats I guess!! This is a cobalt forum, not mod your $3,000 rusted old sub 200 whp v8 forum
For a better comparison lets talk about same year of camaro with the same mods, ohh it would be faster!! :*(
215 hp V8 from 1997
260 hp V8 from 2002
300 hp v8 from 2005
Beware of the dime a dozen mustang gts you see everywhere that are gutless and slow, guess this guy put a turbo on his beater? Grats I guess!! This is a cobalt forum, not mod your $3,000 rusted old sub 200 whp v8 forum
For a better comparison lets talk about same year of camaro with the same mods, ohh it would be faster!! :*(
#66
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: 06-23-09
Location: Chesterfield Missouri
Posts: 3,820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
205 hp V8 from 1992
215 hp V8 from 1997
260 hp V8 from 2002
300 hp v8 from 2005
Beware of the dime a dozen mustang gts you see everywhere that are gutless and slow, guess this guy put a turbo on his beater? Grats I guess!! This is a cobalt forum, not mod your $3,000 rusted old sub 200 whp v8 forum
For a better comparison lets talk about same year of camaro with the same mods, ohh it would be faster!! :*(
215 hp V8 from 1997
260 hp V8 from 2002
300 hp v8 from 2005
Beware of the dime a dozen mustang gts you see everywhere that are gutless and slow, guess this guy put a turbo on his beater? Grats I guess!! This is a cobalt forum, not mod your $3,000 rusted old sub 200 whp v8 forum
For a better comparison lets talk about same year of camaro with the same mods, ohh it would be faster!! :*(
Also dome a dozen? Did you forget we drive cobalts? It's not like we are driving an sl65 black or a veyron. But those gutless gt's your talking about are typically faster than at least a stock Ss/Sc with an engine block dating back to the late 50's (the 302 was originally a 260..).
#68
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: 08-12-09
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You need to learn how to drive the Mustang at the track. You spent too much time spooling the turbo in between shifts. Your launch wasn't that great either. Get some drag bags.
I was defending the Mustang a little but after reading the rest of this thread I can see it getting locked up due to the douche-bag attitude. Everyone knows that there is no replacement for displacement. For you to race against a nearly stock TC is retarded. It isn't a fair race.
As for the new Mustang vs the New Camaro? Mustang will beat the Camaro 9 times out of 10. Displacement didn't help the heavy Camaro any.
I was defending the Mustang a little but after reading the rest of this thread I can see it getting locked up due to the douche-bag attitude. Everyone knows that there is no replacement for displacement. For you to race against a nearly stock TC is retarded. It isn't a fair race.
As for the new Mustang vs the New Camaro? Mustang will beat the Camaro 9 times out of 10. Displacement didn't help the heavy Camaro any.
#69
Edit: Before you call BS on my 60'
#70
Senior Member
Join Date: 12-19-10
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I bought my cobalt for cornering fun, something your car with 10k of suspension work could never do well.
#71
#72
#75
No, just failure on the lack of knowledge on this forum against Mustangs that everyone in here hates so much.