War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

My first time... KILL! :-D

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2009, 01:18 PM
  #126  
Senior Member
 
ShortStack's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-16-08
Location: Boynton Beach, Fl
Posts: 5,610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also..

Curb Weight:

Mustang: 3,352 lbs
Cobalt: 2,975 lbs
Old 08-03-2009, 01:21 PM
  #127  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
cgrammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-08-07
Location: Far from you
Posts: 5,792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sith_killer_99
Oh and nice work on the stealth mode, de-badged is the way to go!
Thank you mucho, senor! She looks sexier this way, too!
Old 08-03-2009, 04:14 PM
  #128  
Senior Member
 
04YellowGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-30-06
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sith_killer_99
Funny, and yes a Cobalt could take down a Mustang GT, especially if it was a 2008 GT.



http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/2008/review.html

VS.



http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=125288

40 hp difference (in favor of the Mustang), with only a .1 sec. advantage for the Mustang at 0-60 yet a .3 sec. advantage to the Cobalt at 1/4 mile. Obviously the Cobalt has a higher trap speed, it would have to, to be making those numbers. Which also means that it is quicker on the top end.

Add to that a driver that an inexperienced, 19 year old kid, and it's pretty easy to see how your SS took him down.

Either way, looking at the numbers it's pretty much a driver's race, with the Cobalt having a slight advantage at higher speeds.

Oh and nice work on the stealth mode, de-badged is the way to go!
HAHA Magazine racing.

That is prolly the worst time I've ever seen on a 05+ Mustang GT. Hell my 04 GT with an auto went 14.5 bone stock.

Sorry but I've drove a 5spd GT to 13.6 and I'm by no menas a pro driver. A GT is a 13sec car all day long with even a decent driver.

A Stock SS/SC doesn't stand a chance against a 2005+ GT from a dig or a roll.
Old 08-04-2009, 07:27 AM
  #129  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by 04YellowGT
HAHA Magazine racing.

That is prolly the worst time I've ever seen on a 05+ Mustang GT. Hell my 04 GT with an auto went 14.5 bone stock.

Sorry but I've drove a 5spd GT to 13.6 and I'm by no menas a pro driver. A GT is a 13sec car all day long with even a decent driver.

A Stock SS/SC doesn't stand a chance against a 2005+ GT from a dig or a roll.
you are correct .... it would take a GM Stage 2 SS/SC or Stock SS/TC to keep up with a 2005+ Stang GT. They are very quick cars.
Old 08-04-2009, 08:48 AM
  #130  
Senior Member
 
amxguy1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-07-05
Location: texas
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sith_killer_99
Funny, and yes a Cobalt could take down a Mustang GT, especially if it was a 2008 GT.



http://www.edmunds.com/ford/mustang/2008/review.html

VS.



http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=125288

40 hp difference (in favor of the Mustang), with only a .1 sec. advantage for the Mustang at 0-60 yet a .3 sec. advantage to the Cobalt at 1/4 mile. Obviously the Cobalt has a higher trap speed, it would have to, to be making those numbers. Which also means that it is quicker on the top end.

Add to that a driver that an inexperienced, 19 year old kid, and it's pretty easy to see how your SS took him down.

Either way, looking at the numbers it's pretty much a driver's race, with the Cobalt having a slight advantage at higher speeds.

Oh and nice work on the stealth mode, de-badged is the way to go!
I am not going to jump on you and call you a moron right away, but why don't you take a closer look at the numbers you provided. Worst ever road test for a GT and what is this, numbers for a TC.

The 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS uses up just 5.8 seconds accelerating to 60 mph, and it goes through the quarter-mile in 14 seconds flat at 103.6 mph. This is a night-and-day improvement over the supercharged Cobalt SS, which couldn't break 7 seconds for 60 mph and ran a 15.2-second quarter at 95.6 mph

Yeah, you lose

Still think she took him down?

Tyler
Old 08-04-2009, 08:58 AM
  #131  
Administrator
Administrator
Platinum Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Staged07SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-30-07
Location: NEPA
Posts: 14,331
Received 197 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by amxguy1970
I am not going to jump on you and call you a moron right away, but why don't you take a closer look at the numbers you provided. Worst ever road test for a GT and what is this, numbers for a TC.

The 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS uses up just 5.8 seconds accelerating to 60 mph, and it goes through the quarter-mile in 14 seconds flat at 103.6 mph. This is a night-and-day improvement over the supercharged Cobalt SS, which couldn't break 7 seconds for 60 mph and ran a 15.2-second quarter at 95.6 mph

Yeah, you lose

Still think she took him down?

Tyler
wow 15.2 sec at 95.6 mph and 7 sec to 60 mph for a stock ss/sc is terrible. the morons testing it deff. didn't know how to drive .... on avg. a stock ss/sc usually hits 60 mph in 5.9-6.1 secs and clears the 1/4 mile in 14.4-14.6 sec @ 98-100 mph. that article is a terrible representation of what a stock ss/sc can do.
Old 08-05-2009, 12:15 AM
  #132  
New Member
 
sith_killer_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-28-09
Location: Ft. Hood
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 04YellowGT
HAHA Magazine racing.

That is prolly the worst time I've ever seen on a 05+ Mustang GT. Hell my 04 GT with an auto went 14.5 bone stock.
Sorry, next time I will borrow a stock version, take it to the track, run it and post the time slips personally. Speaking of which, where are your time slips?

I may have been "magazine" racing, but at least it's independent and verifiable, as opposed to an anecdotal internet post by some random person.

Originally Posted by amxguy1970
I am not going to jump on you and call you a moron right away, but why don't you take a closer look at the numbers you provided. Worst ever road test for a GT and what is this, numbers for a TC.

The 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS uses up just 5.8 seconds accelerating to 60 mph, and it goes through the quarter-mile in 14 seconds flat at 103.6 mph. This is a night-and-day improvement over the supercharged Cobalt SS, which couldn't break 7 seconds for 60 mph and ran a 15.2-second quarter at 95.6 mph

Yeah, you lose

Still think she took him down?

Tyler
My mistake, OP didn't mention she was running the SS/SC, I guess I just ASSumed. Given the numbers, I READILY admit my mistake, thank you for setting me straight, and congratulations, you win. I also appreciate the random personal attack.
Old 08-05-2009, 12:48 AM
  #133  
Member
 
Auddasea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-09-08
Location: Tucson
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow this has been going for quite some time lol... A lot of people race in and out of traffic...including me and probably the 20+ cars I've raced while having my car...That's a pretty gosh darn high ratio lol... I even remember racing a z28 and a corvett, yeh I got the **** spanked out of me but we were all 3 swerving in and out of traffic... the majority does it...Hence why aint so many people at the "legal races"...every time I go I see maybe 12 entrys...than I go to the fair grounds in tucson with a long stretch and see about 20+ hondas, 2-3 cobalts, a **** load of mustangs so kind of debunks your theories .... yeh were ignorant and could hurt someone, population control id say
Old 08-05-2009, 12:49 AM
  #134  
Senior Member
 
04YellowGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-30-06
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sith_killer_99
Sorry, next time I will borrow a stock version, take it to the track, run it and post the time slips personally. Speaking of which, where are your time slips?

I may have been "magazine" racing, but at least it's independent and verifiable, as opposed to an anecdotal internet post by some random person.
So you can look up an edmonds time but you can't get on dragtimes.com or a car forum to see what these cars are running at the tracks?

Most magazine tests are jokes and they usually don't even go to a 1/4 mile track to get their results. Instead they use a high dollar G-Tech. In other words the info they give you is worthless.

I don't have any slips from when I drove the 05+ GT mostly because it wasn't mine and I didn't care.

Heres my 10sec slip though

Old 08-05-2009, 12:54 AM
  #135  
New Member
 
godsr4u2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-18-08
Location: Hampton, Va
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well i have to say that i has been fun reading this whole thing an all i am doing is laughing because its funny to see everyone typing stuff back an forth over something that was yes dumb, but i myself have taken part in activities such as she did, but im not saying its a smart idea to do. But anyways congrats on ur win i know wut it feels like to beat cocky ppl on the road.
Old 08-05-2009, 02:48 AM
  #136  
Banned
 
gr3y_f0x_n1nja's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-13-09
Location: N. Burbs, MN
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by godsr4u2
Well i have to say that i has been fun reading this whole thing an all i am doing is laughing because its funny to see everyone typing stuff back an forth over something that was yes dumb, but i myself have taken part in activities such as she did, but im not saying its a smart idea to do. But anyways congrats on ur win i know wut it feels like to beat cocky ppl on the road.
Laugh all you want. You can't road race you moron cause you have a *****! But because she doesn't, she can race! So... THERE!!!
Old 08-05-2009, 09:44 AM
  #137  
Senior Member
 
amxguy1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-07-05
Location: texas
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sith_killer_99
My mistake, OP didn't mention she was running the SS/SC, I guess I just ASSumed. Given the numbers, I READILY admit my mistake, thank you for setting me straight, and congratulations, you win. I also appreciate the random personal attack.
Hey hey, I said I wasn't going to call you a moron and didn't. All I said was you lose based on the info you gave. Atleast you were big enough to admit your mistake, but I did not attack you...

I guess the score is Tyler-3,428 and CobaltSS members-0. Thank you though!

Tyler
Old 08-05-2009, 10:10 AM
  #138  
Member
 
1niceLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-24-09
Location: Maryland
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gr3y_f0x_n1nja
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/war-stories-54/sketchy-race-182612/

See what I mean? A guy posts the same thing and gets torn apart.
I was atually gonna try to find this to show that yeah if it were a guy that was racing like this he would get torn a new one but since its a chick everones like oh its ok and such etc.....such a double standard
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
05-28-2022 03:47 AM
TeQTonySunshine
New Members Check In!!
12
08-28-2015 08:57 PM
p7x
War Stories
31
12-14-2005 09:35 PM
Co'Baller
General Cobalt
6
06-25-2005 02:05 AM



Quick Reply: My first time... KILL! :-D



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 PM.