War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

purplehaze03 vs. hyundai genesis V6

Old Nov 10, 2009 | 01:14 PM
  #26  
Mike09SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-12-08
Posts: 970
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo
Originally Posted by ajjaro
wow, im assuming you didnt pull more because of bad traction and you stopped at 70, my ss/sc is around 220 whp, and is very even from a 40 roll with a gen coupe v6 until 100 mph, i have raced them multiple times, they pull up top....

edit: i jsut read that he had intake, exhaust... with intake and exhaust they should still be slightly slower than a stock tc from a roll



their stock turbo maxes out at 260 whp...


eh id want something at least as fast as my car. thats kinda weak.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 06:05 PM
  #27  
ajjaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-09-08
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by purplehaze03
LMAO that was the majority of the problem having semi bald tires and tune=not a great combination for traction, it was a quick sprint and i was pulling him spinning wheels, he just thought he would pull up and spank a cobalt
yeah, makes sense... the genesis is great value and very nice, however for some reason, even tho power to weight dicatates it should be on par with the g35 and 37, its slower, considerably slower, they trap maximum 101 mph and run low 14's to very high 13's...

Originally Posted by Mike09SS
eh id want something at least as fast as my car. thats kinda weak.
its weaker than everyone expected... its slightly slower than a stock srt-4 neon

Last edited by ajjaro; Nov 10, 2009 at 06:05 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 09:47 AM
  #28  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Mike09SS
what was done to it...must be a pretty good amount to keep up. you should have pulled buslengths on a stock 1
40-70 takes less than two seconds with his car. The race was about 2 seconds long and he pulled a car on him. 40-120 whould have been many bus lengths.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 09:53 AM
  #29  
n323er's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-19-07
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
From: Glen Burnie MD
Those cars are pretty fast! and not to bad looking its too bad its a hyundai

Nice comment comming from a chevy owner sorry had to

Anyway whats wrong with Hyundai a lot has changed from the mid 90's
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 08:29 PM
  #30  
CordiaDOHC's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 06-23-09
Posts: 3,809
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield Missouri
Originally Posted by Terminator2
40-70 takes less than two seconds with his car. The race was about 2 seconds long and he pulled a car on him. 40-120 whould have been many bus lengths.
really less than 2 seconds? So hes a mid 10 second car?

i mean a 480hp porsche can only muster it in 2.5 seconds... and only runs a measly 11.6

http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...81.html?page=3
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 02:25 PM
  #31  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
Those cars can look AWESOME with a few exterior mods. The hks genesis looks sexy as hell. I was just a bit disappointed with BOTH of the engine options. Both are underpowered and the 2.0 is a little weak.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 12:32 AM
  #32  
SLoW SHO's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: CT
Just to clarify, the 4 cyl Genesis has essentially an Evo engine. Their stock turbo is good for 300-320whp easily. A friend of mine has one with a down pipe, tune, more boost, etc. and made over 300whp.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 12:44 AM
  #33  
n323er's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-19-07
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
From: Glen Burnie MD


Way hotter than a cobalt IMO
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 02:10 AM
  #34  
jarhead's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-15-08
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by SLoW SHO
Just to clarify, the 4 cyl Genesis has essentially an Evo engine. Their stock turbo is good for 300-320whp easily. A friend of mine has one with a down pipe, tune, more boost, etc. and made over 300whp.
Wrong the block may be the same but the similarities end there not near as strong as an evo engine.

So I've heard lots of rumors that the Genesis was coming with the same 4B11 engine from the Mitsubishi Evo. Well, it's time to put all those rumors away. The turbo 4-cylinder Genesis comes with the Theta engine (G4KC), not a 4B11. Hyundai, Mitsubishi, and Chrysler joined forces to form GEMA (Global Engine Manufacturing Alliance), a shared engine manufacturer. Once the layout of the 4-cylinder engine was designed, each company tweaked with it to suit their own needs. Mitsubishi has the 4B11, Chrysler has The World Engine, and Hyundai has the Theta. So both the Theta and 4B11 come from the same group, and same bloodline, but they are two different engines. Furthermore, I talked to fabricator Gary Castillo of Design Craft Fabrication who's already begun building both the V6 and the inline four engines. Gary assured me that although the 4B11 and Theta engines are similar, they are still quite different. Think of the two engines as more like brothers than twins. Not only are the manifold bolt patterns different, the head designs are completely different. But that's not to say the Theta engine won't have the same aftermarket support that the 4B11 is getting.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 02:24 AM
  #35  
SLoW SHO's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: CT
I said essentially. It's a turbo 2.0 from the same family of engines, with a turbo comparable to the Evo. They run 11-12psi stock whereas the Evo runs about 20 stock. They make 300+whp with exhaust and some more boost. Tell Gary Castillo of Design Craft Fabrication that his opinion is not needed in this debate.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 02:26 AM
  #36  
Rissa's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-08
Posts: 24,605
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Hmm I've never seen any of the 2.0's hit 300 whp, only in the 240ish range. Odd.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 02:37 AM
  #37  
SLoW SHO's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by Rissa
Hmm I've never seen any of the 2.0's hit 300 whp, only in the 240ish range. Odd.
Rissa I'd never lie to you, ilu <3
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 02:38 AM
  #38  
Rissa's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-06-08
Posts: 24,605
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Lol soul mate <3
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 02:43 AM
  #39  
SLoW SHO's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: CT
I stand corrected (it happens from time to time, yes I'm shocked too)

He made 275whp, 315wtq. Intake, downpipe, tune + boost.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 03:51 AM
  #40  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
Originally Posted by SLoW SHO
Just to clarify, the 4 cyl Genesis has essentially an Evo engine. Their stock turbo is good for 300-320whp easily. A friend of mine has one with a down pipe, tune, more boost, etc. and made over 300whp.
If by essentially you mean the block itself is similar then yea. Everything else is changed. Internals, coolant delivery is different, the head is different...They're about as similar as an ls1 and an ls7. The Genesis' 2.0 won't hold nearly as much power as a 4b11t. The first shop to break 350rwhp with one bent a rod a few weeks later.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 07:32 AM
  #41  
SLoW SHO's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: CT
More like an LS1 v Ls6 Or better yet L92/LS3.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 01:23 PM
  #42  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by CordiaDOHC
really less than 2 seconds? So hes a mid 10 second car?

i mean a 480hp porsche can only muster it in 2.5 seconds... and only runs a measly 11.6

http://www.popularmechanics.com/auto...81.html?page=3
Yep, my car does 60-100 in 4.6 seconds. There is a thread with screenshots in the LNF tech section if you do not believe me. 40-70 takes less than two seconds on my car. I will log it tommorrow if you want proof. I have plenty of logs to compare. Stock SS/TC runs 8.5 seconds from 60-100 accroding to logs I did yesterday on a customer's car. It ran 5.5seconds from 60-100 with just tuning.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 09:32 AM
  #43  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
As promised here is a log of my car running from 40-70 in 2nd gear. Don't blink you will miss it.





Yes, that is right it took 1 second flat. Gotta love over 400 wrtq.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #44  
SLoW SHO's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: CT
I remember when someone else was posting those stupid scans, thinking they ran like 12.3 @ 117. Then get lit by 113mph car by 5+ carlengths. Also if those numbers in your sig are from those scans you're halarious and have zero credibility.

I'll go get my gtec and run 11.0 @ 130mph all day.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 12:50 PM
  #45  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
lololololololol
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 02:07 PM
  #46  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by SLoW SHO
I remember when someone else was posting those stupid scans, thinking they ran like 12.3 @ 117. Then get lit by 113mph car by 5+ carlengths. Also if those numbers in your sig are from those scans you're halarious and have zero credibility.

I'll go get my gtec and run 11.0 @ 130mph all day.
This is not a gtec it takes data directly from the car. Not a half assed accelerometer. My car traps 117-118 BTW. Are you trying to imply that I made that scan data up because I would have no idea how to do that. The scanner cannot read nor measure HP. That is what a dyno is for. Anything else? BTW My car is over 400 wrtq at 24-26 psi with the MBC I can assure you of that.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 03:05 PM
  #47  
SLoW SHO's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: CT
Video/timeslip of said 117-118mph traps please. I don't care what car that should be trapping this mph only pulled you by this many cars, or that car that suppoesd to trap that much lost by that many cars.

What did YOUR car run at the TRACK. Please post reasonable proof, until then you're just another starry eyed child.

Edit: I see that you're just another salesman. "OMG 40-70 in 1 second! You can buy my tune and do the same! I'm l33t tuner extrordinare! Buy now! 117-118mph traps but dooooon't ask for slips!"

Very similar shenanigans as ZZP, I see you've been watching them and taking notes. Post up all kinds of ridiculous numbers and claims that no one else can replicate and start threads to Buy Now!

Last edited by SLoW SHO; Dec 22, 2009 at 03:22 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 03:29 PM
  #48  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by SLoW SHO
Video/timeslip of said 117-118mph traps please. I don't care what car that should be trapping this mph only pulled you by this many cars, or that car that suppoesd to trap that much lost by that many cars.

What did YOUR car run at the TRACK. Please post reasonable proof, until then you're just another starry eyed child.

Edit: I see that you're just another salesman. "OMG 40-70 in 1 second! You can buy my tune and do the same! I'm l33t tuner extrordinare! Buy now! 117-118mph traps but dooooon't ask for slips!"

Very similar shenanigans as ZZP, I see you've been watching them and taking notes. Post up all kinds of ridiculous numbers and claims that no one else can replicate and start threads to Buy Now!
Wow always the pompous ass aren't you? You dont have to believe me and I dont care what you think. Do you think I faked those screenshots or something? You do not know a thing about me so you trying to judge me is misguided to say the least.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 03:32 PM
  #49  
SLoW SHO's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 11-29-06
Posts: 1,935
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Wow always the pompous ass aren't you? You dont have to believe me and I dont care what you think. Do you think I faked those screenshots or something? You do not know a thing about me so you trying to judge me is misguided to say the least.
You're just like all salesmen. I have no doubt you went from 40-70 in 1 second. You spun your tires, its easy!

This scan **** is proof of NOTHING. I see you totally dodged any comment about going to THE TRACK.
You wont ever go to the track and post proof of your high 12 at sub 114 slips, because when you do, all the little sheeple you sold tunes to who were promised the world will realize your tune is no better than anyone elses.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 03:43 PM
  #50  
06slowbaltsc's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-16-09
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: fayettenam
i seen a sentra beat a genesis
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:30 AM.