War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

Raced a 08 HHR SS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #126  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by cakeeater
why does everyone insist the tranny is at it's max? did some gm rep say this again, or someone else that has no clue what they are talking about? I'm gonna let you in on a little secret...most people that work for gm, or ford, or chrysler, whoever have absolutely NO IDEA what they are talking about. Half the people we get these "leaks" from are the guys that design the window up/down buttons, the steering wheels, punch numbers behind a desk, etc. How do you guys know the tranny is almost maxed out? did they give you the name of the transmission and you guys just assumed it is exactly the same? If they said, "the transmission is almost maxed out" and didn't give an explanation why, i would just wait and see. car companies don't necessarily keep the trannies they put in their cars at the same specs they got them from tremec or the like. They can use better synchros, stronger gears, diff input shafts, etc. i would bet money the tranny they put in the new ss will still at least have quite a bit of torque tolerance left.
Most people get the rated torque number from GM's own naming system. The F35 used in supercharged and turbocharged Cobalts refers to the 350N*M of torque the transaxle is engineered to handle.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:10 PM
  #127  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
Originally Posted by Witt
Most people get the rated torque number from GM's own naming system. The F35 used in supercharged and turbocharged Cobalts refers to the 350N*M of torque the transaxle is engineered to handle.
yes, but like i said just because it is an f35 doesn't mean it is going to be identical to the ss/sc's tranny. example: the 5r55s transmission (automatic) in the 2005+ v6 mustangs has the exact same name as the 5r55s in the gt, but the input shaft is smaller (weaker) and some other minor differences make the 5r55s in the gt quite a bit stronger, but on paper it would seem they have exactly the same transmission.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #128  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by cakeeater
yes, but like i said just because it is an f35 doesn't mean it is going to be identical to the ss/sc's tranny. example: the 5r55s transmission (automatic) in the 2005+ v6 mustangs has the exact same name as the 5r55s in the gt, but the input shaft is smaller (weaker) and some other minor differences make the 5r55s in the gt quite a bit stronger, but on paper it would seem they have exactly the same transmission.
Ford doesn't designate their transmissions by their rated torque.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:19 PM
  #129  
balla's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: socal
Originally Posted by Witt
Ford doesn't designate their transmissions by their rated torque.
Don't you love when people grasp at straws???
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #130  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by balla
Don't you love when people grasp at straws???
No kidding.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #131  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
Originally Posted by Witt
Ford doesn't designate their transmissions by their rated torque.
what are you talking about? f35 has nothing to do with the torque rating. That is MU3. The TR-6060 in the z06 is called the TR-6060 in the zr1 and gt500 as well but is internally very different. THis is where the MH3 vs MM6, etc. comes into play. Has it been confirmed that the MU3 is being used in the new ss? Otherwise, the f35 in the ss/sc could be different than the f35 in the ss/tc.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 07:09 PM
  #132  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by cakeeater
what are you talking about? f35 has nothing to do with the torque rating. That is MU3. The TR-6060 in the z06 is called the TR-6060 in the zr1 and gt500 as well but is internally very different. THis is where the MH3 vs MM6, etc. comes into play. Has it been confirmed that the MU3 is being used in the new ss? Otherwise, the f35 in the ss/sc could be different than the f35 in the ss/tc.
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...08_GME_MU3.xls

Courtesy of http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...2008/08car.htm

Anything else I can help you with?
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 07:31 PM
  #133  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
ahhh see thats what i was looking for. Nobody anywhere else could tell me if it was the MU3. i guess you are all fucked then. sucks.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #134  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
no, ss tc is fucked. Not us.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #135  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
Originally Posted by ralliartist
no, ss tc is fucked. Not us.
nah you're all just fucked. 260 ft lbs = poop. what are all the turbo guys gonna do? those trannies aren't lasting long. what matches up tranny wise? f40?
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 08:05 PM
  #136  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
I don't know what the tranny code is for a '03-'04 cavy with the 2.2 ecotec, but I'm considering trying that swap as I'm a drag racer and those trannies have WAY better gearing for acceleration.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2008 | 08:30 PM
  #137  
04YellowGT's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-06
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by cakeeater
nah you're all just fucked. 260 ft lbs = poop. what are all the turbo guys gonna do? those trannies aren't lasting long. what matches up tranny wise? f40?
It seems like the SC guys are doing the same thing to the upcoming TC like the Terminator guys did to the GT500 when they found out something else was going to be top dog. They are trying to find flaws in it to make it look like they still have the better car.

Here’s the way I look at it, GM knows that this is a tuner car and will be modified so why would they put the same trans in a car that is going to be making more hp and tq stock and be easier to mod. Like cakeeater said it would be nothing for them to upgrade the internals of the trans, that was what was originally done to the GT500. All they did was put a beefed up T-56 in it at the beginning and then decided to put the T-6060 in it later into the design.

How much longer is it until the TCs go into production? They can make changes with less than 3 months till production starts, Ford did that with the 03-04 Cobras. I just think you guys might be surprised what happens. They could keep the same trans in it but the very well might change it also. Either way it would be nothing to beef that trans up for $1500 and have a very solid trans, which the same would go for you guys also.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2008 | 06:01 AM
  #138  
domin8_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-10-06
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Well, they already changed the final drive ratio from 4.05 in the SS/SC to 3.87 in the SS/TC. It's possible that they could have changed something else. We'll just have to wait and see.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 05:07 PM
  #139  
xonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-13-05
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence/K.C
Originally Posted by 04YellowGT
It seems like the SC guys are doing the same thing to the upcoming TC like the Terminator guys did to the GT500 when they found out something else was going to be top dog. They are trying to find flaws in it to make it look like they still have the better car.

Here’s the way I look at it, GM knows that this is a tuner car and will be modified so why would they put the same trans in a car that is going to be making more hp and tq stock and be easier to mod. Like cakeeater said it would be nothing for them to upgrade the internals of the trans, that was what was originally done to the GT500. All they did was put a beefed up T-56 in it at the beginning and then decided to put the T-6060 in it later into the design.

How much longer is it until the TCs go into production? They can make changes with less than 3 months till production starts, Ford did that with the 03-04 Cobras. I just think you guys might be surprised what happens. They could keep the same trans in it but the very well might change it also. Either way it would be nothing to beef that trans up for $1500 and have a very solid trans, which the same would go for you guys also.
But who wants to drop $1500 on a rebuild for a new car? Not to mention the issues that'll bring up with the cars powertrain warranty.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 06:32 PM
  #140  
04YellowGT's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-06
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by xonic
But who wants to drop $1500 on a rebuild for a new car? Not to mention the issues that'll bring up with the cars powertrain warranty.
Uhhh the same people that add nitrous, superchargers, turbos, exhaust, ect to their new cars. All those void the warranty and people still do it. If you’re worried about the warranty you shouldn’t be racing or modding your car anyway because the manufacturer can void you warranty if they see any mods or signs of racing or abuse. Plus if you get the trans built by a good shop you shouldn’t have to worry about it breaking and that wouldn’t affect the motor warranty anyway.

I didn’t have my car a year and the warranty was long gone. The car didn’t even have 10k miles on it by the time I had full exhaust, Vortech Supercharger, Paxton A/A IC, 4.10 gears, and an upgraded fuel system. By 20k I had a built motor, cams and another fuel system.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 07:26 PM
  #141  
stryder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-14-06
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
how bout you post somewhere other than war stories?
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #142  
Brandon97Z's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-13-04
Posts: 3,394
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by ralliartist
I don't know what the tranny code is for a '03-'04 cavy with the 2.2 ecotec, but I'm considering trying that swap as I'm a drag racer and those trannies have WAY better gearing for acceleration.

f23 same as the 2.2 and 2.4 cobalts.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 08:00 PM
  #143  
memphisr24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-20-05
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 1
From: Rutherford, NJ
I think you guys are taking this tranny issue way out of proportion. Just because you have 261+ lbs of tq, doesn't mean you're going to blow it up. You have to take into consideration as to how you drive/treat it. If you beat the **** out of it, of course it's going to blow eventually. But I do not think people will have tranny problems with this 260 ft/lb rated tranny except the morons who beat the ever living **** out of their cars.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2008 | 10:21 PM
  #144  
xonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-13-05
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: Lawrence/K.C
Originally Posted by 04YellowGT
Uhhh the same people that add nitrous, superchargers, turbos, exhaust, ect to their new cars. All those void the warranty and people still do it. If you’re worried about the warranty you shouldn’t be racing or modding your car anyway because the manufacturer can void you warranty if they see any mods or signs of racing or abuse. Plus if you get the trans built by a good shop you shouldn’t have to worry about it breaking and that wouldn’t affect the motor warranty anyway.

I didn’t have my car a year and the warranty was long gone. The car didn’t even have 10k miles on it by the time I had full exhaust, Vortech Supercharger, Paxton A/A IC, 4.10 gears, and an upgraded fuel system. By 20k I had a built motor, cams and another fuel system.
You've misunderstood me. My main point was about people probably not wanting to drop $1500 on a transmission rebuild after a few basic bolt-ons and maybe a tune which would probably be less than $1500 anyway, on a brand new car. The bit about the warranty is just because a lot of people use the car for a DD and seem to care about having one.

Note: I'm not saying the tranny is only rated for 260ft-lbs I'm just making a point about it.

Originally Posted by memphisr24
I think you guys are taking this tranny issue way out of proportion. Just because you have 261+ lbs of tq, doesn't mean you're going to blow it up. You have to take into consideration as to how you drive/treat it. If you beat the **** out of it, of course it's going to blow eventually. But I do not think people will have tranny problems with this 260 ft/lb rated tranny except the morons who beat the ever living **** out of their cars.
Think about it like this. You can have a car making 500bhp and 500lb-ft with a clutch rated for 450lb-ft and it'll run fine at first but the clutch will wear faster. Similar logic can be applied if the new balt's trans is really only good for 260lb-ft then it'll begin to fail sooner based on how much you increase the motors torque output.

I've seen Chevy do some stupid **** in the past but I doubt they'd really put a tranny in the car thats already at it's max rating.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2008 | 03:45 AM
  #145  
domin8_gt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-10-06
Posts: 3,014
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by xonic
I've seen Chevy do some stupid **** in the past but I doubt they'd really put a tranny in the car thats already at it's max rating unless they were trying to return to profitablility through platform and parts sharing in order to reduce costs. This way they don't have to spend ungodly amounts in R&D, testing etc.
^^^Fix0red for you.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2008 | 06:36 AM
  #146  
memphisr24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-20-05
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 1
From: Rutherford, NJ
I still think it's going to be fine...just my personal opinion
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2008 | 11:37 PM
  #147  
BCobaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Is the LNF and the LSJ have the same tranny?I thought LSJ had the F30 and the LNF F35
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 11:46 AM
  #148  
memphisr24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-20-05
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 1
From: Rutherford, NJ
Originally Posted by xonic

Note: I'm not saying the tranny is only rated for 260ft-lbs I'm just making a point about it.



Think about it like this. You can have a car making 500bhp and 500lb-ft with a clutch rated for 450lb-ft and it'll run fine at first but the clutch will wear faster. Similar logic can be applied if the new balt's trans is really only good for 260lb-ft then it'll begin to fail sooner based on how much you increase the motors torque output.

I've seen Chevy do some stupid **** in the past but I doubt they'd really put a tranny in the car thats already at it's max rating.
Agreed. But most people are crying rivers because of this. They are over reacting when everything will be fine. I had a stock clutch with a 2.5 pulley and many passes down the track until 36k miles on the car....EVEN THEN my clutch was still strong. The shop that did my clutch gave me the clutch back and said I could use it as a spare. It had some heat marks on it but is fine and grabbed fine right until I swapped it out. (That is an example of how driving a certain way will prolong parts. I remember everyone was saying the cluthc is the biggest pos ever...Well I don't think that at all. People just beat on their cars 24/7 when they shouldn't be and just don't know how to drive correctly to prolong thel ife of parts). I'm gonna stick to my opinion. The trans will be fine with more power except to the idiots who beat the crap out of their cars.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2008 | 01:34 PM
  #149  
USMCFieldMP's Avatar
Rattlesnake Race Shop
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 06-08-06
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 410
From: Fort Worth, TX
Originally Posted by BCobaltSS
Is the LNF and the LSJ have the same tranny?I thought LSJ had the F30 and the LNF F35
Nope... same same. In the Cobalt at least... I'm not sure of the LNF-HHR trannies.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KMO43
Front Page News
33
Jan 12, 2016 12:01 AM
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
Oct 27, 2015 01:27 PM
agentirons
Electronics, Audio, and Video
2
Oct 16, 2015 02:11 AM
maliki778
Dyno Results
4
Oct 1, 2015 07:39 PM
SSLOW06
Complete Cars
1
Oct 1, 2015 07:21 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 AM.