Raced a 08 HHR SS
why does everyone insist the tranny is at it's max? did some gm rep say this again, or someone else that has no clue what they are talking about? I'm gonna let you in on a little secret...most people that work for gm, or ford, or chrysler, whoever have absolutely NO IDEA what they are talking about. Half the people we get these "leaks" from are the guys that design the window up/down buttons, the steering wheels, punch numbers behind a desk, etc. How do you guys know the tranny is almost maxed out? did they give you the name of the transmission and you guys just assumed it is exactly the same? If they said, "the transmission is almost maxed out" and didn't give an explanation why, i would just wait and see. car companies don't necessarily keep the trannies they put in their cars at the same specs they got them from tremec or the like. They can use better synchros, stronger gears, diff input shafts, etc. i would bet money the tranny they put in the new ss will still at least have quite a bit of torque tolerance left.
yes, but like i said just because it is an f35 doesn't mean it is going to be identical to the ss/sc's tranny. example: the 5r55s transmission (automatic) in the 2005+ v6 mustangs has the exact same name as the 5r55s in the gt, but the input shaft is smaller (weaker) and some other minor differences make the 5r55s in the gt quite a bit stronger, but on paper it would seem they have exactly the same transmission.
yes, but like i said just because it is an f35 doesn't mean it is going to be identical to the ss/sc's tranny. example: the 5r55s transmission (automatic) in the 2005+ v6 mustangs has the exact same name as the 5r55s in the gt, but the input shaft is smaller (weaker) and some other minor differences make the 5r55s in the gt quite a bit stronger, but on paper it would seem they have exactly the same transmission.
what are you talking about? f35 has nothing to do with the torque rating. That is MU3. The TR-6060 in the z06 is called the TR-6060 in the zr1 and gt500 as well but is internally very different. THis is where the MH3 vs MM6, etc. comes into play. Has it been confirmed that the MU3 is being used in the new ss? Otherwise, the f35 in the ss/sc could be different than the f35 in the ss/tc.
what are you talking about? f35 has nothing to do with the torque rating. That is MU3. The TR-6060 in the z06 is called the TR-6060 in the zr1 and gt500 as well but is internally very different. THis is where the MH3 vs MM6, etc. comes into play. Has it been confirmed that the MU3 is being used in the new ss? Otherwise, the f35 in the ss/sc could be different than the f35 in the ss/tc.
Courtesy of http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en...2008/08car.htm
Anything else I can help you with?
I don't know what the tranny code is for a '03-'04 cavy with the 2.2 ecotec, but I'm considering trying that swap as I'm a drag racer and those trannies have WAY better gearing for acceleration.
Here’s the way I look at it, GM knows that this is a tuner car and will be modified so why would they put the same trans in a car that is going to be making more hp and tq stock and be easier to mod. Like cakeeater said it would be nothing for them to upgrade the internals of the trans, that was what was originally done to the GT500. All they did was put a beefed up T-56 in it at the beginning and then decided to put the T-6060 in it later into the design.
How much longer is it until the TCs go into production? They can make changes with less than 3 months till production starts, Ford did that with the 03-04 Cobras. I just think you guys might be surprised what happens. They could keep the same trans in it but the very well might change it also. Either way it would be nothing to beef that trans up for $1500 and have a very solid trans, which the same would go for you guys also.
Well, they already changed the final drive ratio from 4.05 in the SS/SC to 3.87 in the SS/TC. It's possible that they could have changed something else. We'll just have to wait and see.
It seems like the SC guys are doing the same thing to the upcoming TC like the Terminator guys did to the GT500 when they found out something else was going to be top dog. They are trying to find flaws in it to make it look like they still have the better car.
Heres the way I look at it, GM knows that this is a tuner car and will be modified so why would they put the same trans in a car that is going to be making more hp and tq stock and be easier to mod. Like cakeeater said it would be nothing for them to upgrade the internals of the trans, that was what was originally done to the GT500. All they did was put a beefed up T-56 in it at the beginning and then decided to put the T-6060 in it later into the design.
How much longer is it until the TCs go into production? They can make changes with less than 3 months till production starts, Ford did that with the 03-04 Cobras. I just think you guys might be surprised what happens. They could keep the same trans in it but the very well might change it also. Either way it would be nothing to beef that trans up for $1500 and have a very solid trans, which the same would go for you guys also.
Heres the way I look at it, GM knows that this is a tuner car and will be modified so why would they put the same trans in a car that is going to be making more hp and tq stock and be easier to mod. Like cakeeater said it would be nothing for them to upgrade the internals of the trans, that was what was originally done to the GT500. All they did was put a beefed up T-56 in it at the beginning and then decided to put the T-6060 in it later into the design.
How much longer is it until the TCs go into production? They can make changes with less than 3 months till production starts, Ford did that with the 03-04 Cobras. I just think you guys might be surprised what happens. They could keep the same trans in it but the very well might change it also. Either way it would be nothing to beef that trans up for $1500 and have a very solid trans, which the same would go for you guys also.
I didnt have my car a year and the warranty was long gone. The car didnt even have 10k miles on it by the time I had full exhaust, Vortech Supercharger, Paxton A/A IC, 4.10 gears, and an upgraded fuel system. By 20k I had a built motor, cams and another fuel system.
I think you guys are taking this tranny issue way out of proportion. Just because you have 261+ lbs of tq, doesn't mean you're going to blow it up. You have to take into consideration as to how you drive/treat it. If you beat the **** out of it, of course it's going to blow eventually. But I do not think people will have tranny problems with this 260 ft/lb rated tranny except the morons who beat the ever living **** out of their cars.
Uhhh the same people that add nitrous, superchargers, turbos, exhaust, ect to their new cars. All those void the warranty and people still do it. If youre worried about the warranty you shouldnt be racing or modding your car anyway because the manufacturer can void you warranty if they see any mods or signs of racing or abuse. Plus if you get the trans built by a good shop you shouldnt have to worry about it breaking and that wouldnt affect the motor warranty anyway.
I didnt have my car a year and the warranty was long gone. The car didnt even have 10k miles on it by the time I had full exhaust, Vortech Supercharger, Paxton A/A IC, 4.10 gears, and an upgraded fuel system. By 20k I had a built motor, cams and another fuel system.
I didnt have my car a year and the warranty was long gone. The car didnt even have 10k miles on it by the time I had full exhaust, Vortech Supercharger, Paxton A/A IC, 4.10 gears, and an upgraded fuel system. By 20k I had a built motor, cams and another fuel system.
Note: I'm not saying the tranny is only rated for 260ft-lbs I'm just making a point about it.
I think you guys are taking this tranny issue way out of proportion. Just because you have 261+ lbs of tq, doesn't mean you're going to blow it up. You have to take into consideration as to how you drive/treat it. If you beat the **** out of it, of course it's going to blow eventually. But I do not think people will have tranny problems with this 260 ft/lb rated tranny except the morons who beat the ever living **** out of their cars.
I've seen Chevy do some stupid **** in the past but I doubt they'd really put a tranny in the car thats already at it's max rating.
I've seen Chevy do some stupid **** in the past but I doubt they'd really put a tranny in the car thats already at it's max rating unless they were trying to return to profitablility through platform and parts sharing in order to reduce costs. This way they don't have to spend ungodly amounts in R&D, testing etc.
Note: I'm not saying the tranny is only rated for 260ft-lbs I'm just making a point about it.
Think about it like this. You can have a car making 500bhp and 500lb-ft with a clutch rated for 450lb-ft and it'll run fine at first but the clutch will wear faster. Similar logic can be applied if the new balt's trans is really only good for 260lb-ft then it'll begin to fail sooner based on how much you increase the motors torque output.
I've seen Chevy do some stupid **** in the past but I doubt they'd really put a tranny in the car thats already at it's max rating.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
agentirons
Electronics, Audio, and Video
2
Oct 16, 2015 02:11 AM





