War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

SS/SC Vs. Srt-4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 01:34 PM
  #51  
Blainestang's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-19-05
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
[QUOTE=adam0416]
Originally Posted by cawpin

Ok, maybe I've misunderstood you. Ok, for horsepower to exist, there has to be torque. My point is that you do not need all that torque to make the car fast. If drag racing is your cup of tea --> in a FWD, I would advise you to stay away from the torque. 250wtq in a Cobalt is sufficient enough to get a VERY good launch in a Cobalt without KILLING the tires. Once you get up to speed the wheel hop will be minimal. However, making 300+ ft/lb tq would begin to slow you down a bit OUT OF THE WHOLE, which is what we're talking about here. The more torque you have, the more lift your car has, and the more weight shifted to the back. What do you think happens when all but a few hundred pounds of the cars total weight is sitting on the back tires, NOT the front? All BUT the weight of the engine will be gone from the front tires, forbidding the tires to ever have decent traction. It's not like RWD cars, you can't just making a 1000 ft/lb torq in a FWD car and expect to hook up..it's not going to happen. AND since you mentioned "street" cars..we'll have to assume that an ordinary Balt is not going to have 14k springs in the back w/ a wheelie bar. We'll assume that is not going to be found on a street car, and since you don't have any reinforcement on the rear side to help to car's weight from shifting..you'll just burn the tires through the first 35ft of the track, and you'll bark tires through 2nd and 3rd, which will furthermore HURT your times, especially if the race is close. At this time you've lost a half a second. So if you want buttloads of torque..maybe you should take the car to Pheonix during the Summer months when the asphault is "sticky" and try to run then. You'll have your best times there despite the 105 degree weather because you'll actually hook up. Torque in a FWD is good for keeping up with bikes in a roll on, not drag racing other RWD cars. If I had the time and money, I would TEST my theory and prove to you that it's right. Which by the way, my theory is not MINE, it's actually the laws of Physics. Torque in FWD cars makes the coefficient of friction go down, which is not good.
First, Torque has absolutely nothing to do with the coefficient of friction. There is no relationship there. In fact, there's not even a correlation.

Second, if you've got too much power (or torque), just use as much as brings you to the edge of traction, and then use the extra power (and torque) when you've got traction. More power or torque won't inherently make you slower in the 1/4 mile... unless you suck at driving.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 02:10 PM
  #52  
adam0416's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-15-06
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Brighton, TN
[QUOTE=Blainestang]
Originally Posted by adam0416

First, Torque has absolutely nothing to do with the coefficient of friction. There is no relationship there. In fact, there's not even a correlation.Second, if you've got too much power (or torque), just use as much as brings you to the edge of traction, and then use the extra power (and torque) when you've got traction. More power or torque won't inherently make you slower in the 1/4 mile... unless you suck at driving.
When you give the car gas, and the torque kicks in-->your car shifts back-->the weight comes off the front tires-->the tires lose traction because less tire is on the ground. So no, the ACTUAL coefficient does not change, but how much of the tire is on the ground does change, which will change the overall effect of the coefficient. If the X number coefficient of friction is sufficient for a good run with the WHOLE tire sitting on the ground..then that same X number coefficient will not be effective if you pull 30% of the tire off the ground because the weight has shifted. My bad, I should've worded that differently. And I promise, on some crappy street tires using 215/45/18's, or whatever similar size there is..you'll not only have tire spin, you'll also have wheelhop. I never said it will make you slower altogether, it just won't be as fast as an engine with the correct amount of torque to launch the car. Launch is all you need the torque for, AND I BELIEVE that too much torque will hurt your launch given that you don't have the expensive suspension mods, RWD setup, and big enough tires to compensate. Let's not fight, please. Your right, I'm wrong. Does that make you happy? Either way, it won't change the outcome of anything.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 02:44 PM
  #53  
Blainestang's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-19-05
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
[QUOTE=adam0416]
Originally Posted by Blainestang

When you give the car gas, and the torque kicks in-->your car shifts back-->the weight comes off the front tires-->the tires lose traction because less tire is on the ground. So no, the ACTUAL coefficient does not change, but how much of the tire is on the ground does change, which will change the overall effect of the coefficient. If the X number coefficient of friction is sufficient for a good run with the WHOLE tire sitting on the ground..then that same X number coefficient will not be effective if you pull 30% of the tire off the ground because the weight has shifted. My bad, I should've worded that differently. And I promise, on some crappy street tires using 215/45/18's, or whatever similar size there is..you'll not only have tire spin, you'll also have wheelhop. I never said it will make you slower altogether, it just won't be as fast as an engine with the correct amount of torque to launch the car. Launch is all you need the torque for, AND I BELIEVE that too much torque will hurt your launch given that you don't have the expensive suspension mods, RWD setup, and big enough tires to compensate. Let's not fight, please. Your right, I'm wrong. Does that make you happy? Either way, it won't change the outcome of anything.
Haha... I don't want to fight you about it, just clearing up. I think it's *mostly* an issue of semantics. Technically, it doesn't change the Coefficient of Friction (which you know), and technically, more power doesn't mean worse times, unless you don't know how to modulate the power. For instance, if your tires can handle 200ft*lb (hp would come into play as well but let's keep it simple), the exact same car putting down 400ft*lb wouldn't inherently be slower than the less powerful car. The driver would just have to go lighter on the gas to make sure he only uses 200ft*lb or whatever, and then, when rolling, use that extra power when traction becomes available. That's all I'm saying. No fight intended
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #54  
West Palm SRT4's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-03-06
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: West Palm
Originally Posted by SilverTurboRidin
Fair warning from a SRT owner to a future owner... Dont buy a modded SRT...its like trying on a used condom...lol

Seriously that is just various signs that it has been abused. And if you need to know what to look for let me know
Yeah, virgin SRT4's are about as common as cheap Supras. Well if he is looking to buy new, there is a guy in Pennsylvania with more than 40 brand new SRT-4's!!
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #55  
cawpin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-06
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: N/A
[QUOTE=Blainestang]
Originally Posted by adam0416

First, Torque has absolutely nothing to do with the coefficient of friction. There is no relationship there. In fact, there's not even a correlation.

Second, if you've got too much power (or torque), just use as much as brings you to the edge of traction, and then use the extra power (and torque) when you've got traction. More power or torque won't inherently make you slower in the 1/4 mile... unless you suck at driving.
Actually, torque related DIRECTLY to coefficient of friction in locomotion of vehicles. That is basic physics. Torque is translated to motion, in a car, through the coefficient of friction between the tires and the pavement. This is why we use "sticky" tires to get a better launch.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #56  
Blainestang's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-19-05
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by cawpin
Actually, torque related DIRECTLY to coefficient of friction in locomotion of vehicles. That is basic physics. Torque is translated to motion, in a car, through the coefficient of friction between the tires and the pavement. This is why we use "sticky" tires to get a better launch.
Nope... I think this is a just a problem with semantics, but torque has absolutely ZERO effect or even a correlation to the coefficient of friction. A specific tire will have the same coefficient of friction with a given surface no matter how much torque your car makes. In fact, it has the same coefficient of friction if there's not even a car connected to the wheel/tire.

The coefficient of friction is merely a relationship between the tire and the surface.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2006 | 01:43 AM
  #57  
cawpin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-26-06
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
From: N/A
I didn't say it had an effect on the coefficient of friction. I said it is directly related to moving a vehicle with tires on pavement. That is what the original statement was in regards to.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turboecotec02
Parts
5
Nov 26, 2015 10:43 AM
RaginChopsuey
War Stories
16
Oct 27, 2015 01:27 PM
brandon04
Problems/Service/Maintenance
46
Oct 21, 2015 07:04 AM
satisfied
Problems/Service/Maintenance
3
Oct 19, 2015 12:35 AM
Bluelightning
War Stories
29
Sep 8, 2015 05:18 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 PM.