SS vs 2003 S2k

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 17, 2011 | 08:35 PM

#51

RyRidesMotox

Senior Member

Joined: 07-23-10

Posts: 3,451

Likes: 0

From: Carlsbad, CA

Well like is aid beastly car... I would go a different route personally but that said you cant argue with results of crushing a 10 second pass.

Feb 17, 2011 | 08:40 PM

#52

Perfect.disguise

Senior Member

Joined: 04-20-08

Posts: 6,780

Likes: 0

From: .

This thing went way off topic, car in question is no where near a 700+whp car. He is not racing me or any other person in this thread.

Though personal exp, riding in one it felt a little bit slower than I remember my stock SC being.

Feb 17, 2011 | 08:57 PM

#53

emiller

Senior Member

Joined: 06-02-08

Posts: 2,985

Likes: 2

From: TN

Quote:

Originally Posted by 08ShowbaltLS

haha r u serious? were talking about about 2.0-2.4L 4 cylinders and youre trying to bring in a ls1 haha. the point im trying to make is that the f22 is superior to the lnf,lsj, and whatever the 2.4 is in the neon. the guy in the thread is comparing his boosted engine vs a n/a s2k and thats all fine but if you boosted that f22 it wouldnt even be a race. i was just saying.

So a better comparison is a turboed F22 to a stock LSJ, LNF, or SRT4 engine? At least the LS1 is a stock engine and happened to be a car similar in price to the S2k.