War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

VW Golf VS Cobalt SS/SC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #151  
iso's Avatar
iso
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-16-05
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
Thank you ISO. I didn't feel like getting that complicated.:P: Also everything you just said I learned in basic physics when I was sophomore in high school. What kind of engineer are you wanting to be?
i'm majoring in civil engineering and i'm either going to minor or double major with mechanical engineering.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 09:12 PM
  #152  
iso's Avatar
iso
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-16-05
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
So what youre saying is, gravity has less of an effect on acceleration than air friction?

How would that be? If you drove a car in a vacuum, yet still had gravity effecting it, its going to be faster than driving a car where there would be no gravity??<< I know you cant do either one of these, but Im just using them as extreme examples.

That doesnt make any sense to me. If gravity decreases, the weight of the car is going to decrease aswell, thus allowing the engine to work less to achieve much better acceleration.
So how would reducing air friction by the same amount, yet maintaining the same gravity make the car accelerate faster and get better 1/4mi times, that doesnt make any sense at all.

That means that if I was to drop the weight of my car 30% ( 870 lbs ) and do a 1/4mi, the time is going to be worse than keeping my car at 2900 lbs, and reducing the air resistance 30%?

I could understand it effecting the top end speed, but not so much the 1/4mi + acceleration. If you have any links I could check out it would be greatly appreciated. Im a huge science fan, so sorry if Im poking and prying, but Im genuinely interested in the mechanics behind this debate.
gravity is a constant, it doesn't show up in any of the eqautions, unless you are trying to figure out how long it will take something to fall. on a flat surface it would not play a role. if the trrack had an uphill slant then it would make a difference but since most tracks i go to are flat, it doesn't matter.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #153  
iso's Avatar
iso
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-16-05
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by venum_us_2002
My friend is getting a VW golf stock and says hes gunna tear me apart in a drag race with my driving my Cobalt SS/SC. Should i be worried?
what year is it? is he getting one of the new ones and is it a golf or a gti. 1.8t? 2.0t? vr6? if it's an mk5 gti (the new ones) and it's a 2.0t you won't have much troule beating it as long as you get a decent launch. they're high 6 seconds 0-60. unless he has the apr or revo reflash for it, then it will be a much closer race, the reflashes for the 2.0t's and the 7.8t's are insane. if it's a vr6 older model, it'll be a closer race but you'll have an advantage as long as you get a good launch. if it's a golf, and not even a gti, you have nothing to worry about.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 01:37 AM
  #154  
280Z1977's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-02-06
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Originally Posted by iso
i'm majoring in civil engineering and i'm either going to minor or double major with mechanical engineering.
Awesome, IF I would have went to college, that is what I would have majored in. I am still young we will see. Good luck.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 08:51 AM
  #155  
c7015's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-05
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by iso
i'm majoring in civil engineering and i'm either going to minor or double major with mechanical engineering.
Don’t Do it ....

I'll be done my Mech Eng this Summer, I currently work for a supplier and its not at all what I am looking for ... I would advise mixing that Civil with something like business instead of having 2 eng Degrees you might find yourself much better off ... or go for your masters
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 08:52 AM
  #156  
c7015's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-05
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
Awesome, IF I would have went to college, that is what I would have majored in. I am still young we will see. Good luck.

mums the word ...


stay in school

Last edited by c7015; Mar 29, 2006 at 03:19 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2006 | 12:33 PM
  #157  
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-05
Posts: 13,306
Likes: 0
From: UNDER YOUR BED
I love science, but business seems so much more appealing.

Im working toward a degree in Business Admin, with a concentration in Financial Analysis. Im trying to go for investment banking as a career. Im possibly going to get my 4 yr degree @ Cornell, depending if my current GPA can transfer. For my 6 yr I want to possibly go to NYIF, or NYU, or a different school if I find a better one.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #158  
SS2fast's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-09-05
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley
Sorry to bring this back, BUT. 8 pages of bitching about weight and HP, and not a single one of you even looked at the torque numbers. Chipped 2.0T GTI 252hp/303lb-ft. That 303lb-ft or torque will move the GTI quicker than the 230lb-ft. of a nicely modded SS.
Listen, torque owns from the drop of the pedal, HP helps further down the strip, or down the highway.
I raced my buddies modded 1.8T with my modded SS, on the highway 3 times. Each and everytime, he pulled on me right from the last honk. Once we hit about 110, he stopped pulling and we were pacing each other with me about 1 car behind.
Bottom line, our torque is our disadvantage.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:20 AM
  #159  
280Z1977's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-02-06
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Originally Posted by SS2fast
Sorry to bring this back, BUT. 8 pages of bitching about weight and HP, and not a single one of you even looked at the torque numbers. Chipped 2.0T GTI 252hp/303lb-ft. That 303lb-ft or torque will move the GTI quicker than the 230lb-ft. of a nicely modded SS.
Listen, torque owns from the drop of the pedal, HP helps further down the strip, or down the highway.
I raced my buddies modded 1.8T with my modded SS, on the highway 3 times. Each and everytime, he pulled on me right from the last honk. Once we hit about 110, he stopped pulling and we were pacing each other with me about 1 car behind.
Bottom line, our torque is our disadvantage.
Actually horsepower is more important and all we need in these discussions.

How you liking this stupid weather?

Originally Posted by c1705
mums the word ...


stay in school
{warning: lil kiddies do not read this}

College is a waste of money unless you want to be an engineer, doctor, lawyer, etc. Even then I could argue that is a waste of money. There are tons of ways to make what college educated people make, sometimes even easier ways. [/rant]
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:32 AM
  #160  
SS2fast's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-09-05
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley
Weather sucks, but the latter part of the week looks promising.

I have to disagree about the HP comment being all that is needed. TQ is what moves the car. Turbos produce more tq than SC's. I've seen it time and time again with VW's. My buddys modded 1.8T will usually pull instantly on most NA, SC, and some turboed cars of equal and even higher HP. They profit from the low end torque, though it haunts them later in the RPM range as the torque diminishes.
Our torque curve is linear and slowly progresses. VWs torque rips down low and tapers off up top. But, not wanting to argue it all day, it's just my opinion.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #161  
c7015's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-02-05
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
Actually horsepower is more important and all we need in these discussions.

How you liking this stupid weather?



{warning: lil kiddies do not read this}

College is a waste of money unless you want to be an engineer, doctor, lawyer, etc. Even then I could argue that is a waste of money. There are tons of ways to make what college educated people make, sometimes even easier ways. [/rant]
haha actually engineering is a waste of time in school ... I learned much more on my co-op .. and half of what I learned there was that what you learned in school dosn't hold up ..
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:38 AM
  #162  
280Z1977's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-02-06
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Originally Posted by SS2fast
Weather sucks, but the latter part of the week looks promising.

I have to disagree about the HP comment being all that is needed. TQ is what moves the car. Turbos produce more tq than SC's. I've seen it time and time again with VW's. My buddys modded 1.8T will usually pull instantly on most NA, SC, and some turboed cars of equal and even higher HP. They profit from the low end torque, though it haunts them later in the RPM range as the torque diminishes.
Our torque curve is linear and slowly progresses. VWs torque rips down low and tapers off up top. But, not wanting to argue it all day, it's just my opinion.
I know what you mean... but go to any quarter mile calculator or trap speed calculator online and see if they ask for torque anywhere. I am not saying torque is useless. Torque lets you take advantage of gearing, horsepower lets you take advantage of RPMs. Both have their purposes, but when accelerating a car horsepower is what matters the most.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:39 AM
  #163  
280Z1977's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-02-06
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Originally Posted by c7015
haha actually engineering is a waste of time in school ... I learned much more on my co-op .. and half of what I learned there was that what you learned in school dosn't hold up ..
I know I didn't want to completely crush the lil kiddies.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:10 PM
  #164  
SS2fast's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-09-05
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
I know what you mean... but go to any quarter mile calculator or trap speed calculator online and see if they ask for torque anywhere. I am not saying torque is useless. Torque lets you take advantage of gearing, horsepower lets you take advantage of RPMs. Both have their purposes, but when accelerating a car horsepower is what matters the most.
Right, but that's because it's easier to calculate a time and speed using two variables. They wouldn't be able to calculate it just using TQ and weight. They'd have to include HP with it.
But those calculators are just estimates in perfect conditions.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 12:27 PM
  #165  
Blainestang's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-19-05
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Originally Posted by SS2fast
Right, but that's because it's easier to calculate a time and speed using two variables. They wouldn't be able to calculate it just using TQ and weight. They'd have to include HP with it.
But those calculators are just estimates in perfect conditions.
Ultimately, what really matters is the area under the hp curve over the rpm range that you are racing in.

Because HP is directly proportional to BOTH Tq and RPM, neither tq or rpm are INHERENTLY meaningful. Take for instance a diesel engine that makes 500lbft of torque. Wow! Too bad it's only at 2000rpm... which is equivalent to ~190hp. Now, let's say you put that engine into an RSX and race it against the stock K20-engined RSX. Now the stock RSX only makes ~130ftlb of tq at it's power peak at 8000rpm. That's equivalent to ~198hp. Also, just for fun, lets assume they weigh the same amount.


So here's what we have:

RSX w/ diesel engine: 500 ftlb @ 2000rpm = 190hp
RSX w/ K20A engine: 130ftlb @8000rpm = 198hp

Which one is faster at that point?..... The one with only 130 ft*lb of tq, because it has more hp.


Now, ultimately, no one races at a set rpm (unless you have a CVT), so you have to race over a range of rpms, but the point is clear...

It doesn't matter how you get there, HP wins races, not torque, no matter what Carrol Shelby says. If you don't have a lot of tq, race in your powerband. Launch in the high rpm, stay in the high rpm.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 02:08 PM
  #166  
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-05
Posts: 13,306
Likes: 0
From: UNDER YOUR BED
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
Actually horsepower is more important and all we need in these discussions.

How you liking this stupid weather?



{warning: lil kiddies do not read this}

College is a waste of money unless you want to be an engineer, doctor, lawyer, etc. Even then I could argue that is a waste of money. There are tons of ways to make what college educated people make, sometimes even easier ways. [/rant]
What the hell kind of an ignorant statement is that?? Let me see you get a job as an investment banker which makes millions without a masters degree. Ya know what any firm will say to you? Get lost.

This is how college vs non college jobs work:

college:

-garanteed a stable decent job ( depending on the degree ).
-education is free if you know how to work the system ( Air Force pays for my Bachlors, there is also tons of student aid out there that people can look into ).
-unless youre starting a business, or are in business with someone your college degree will allow a higher paying job than someone without one.

non college:

-most reputable high paying jobs require a Bachlors or higher, therefore getting a job that pays 6 figures+ without any degree is going to be extremely hard.
-knowing people is one of the best ways to get a good job without a degree.
-entry level jobs really dont pay squat, u need some sort of technical training/schooling of some sort.

I know a person who is in investment banking. He has a golf course, inground swimming pool, tennis court, mansion, etc., and he has a MBA. Unless youre Bill Gates and pull off a miracle, your average Joe Shmoe without a degree isnt going to be able to get these things and pull these huge salaries ( aka doctors, lawyers, etc ).

Either way, u need some sort of technical training/schooling to make good $$. Im sure your salary doesnt even come close to 6 figs.

Saying college is a waste is an ignorant statment Id expect from someone who isnt smart enough to pull good grades in college. School isnt for everyone, but now adays it is the BEST way to get a good paying job.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #167  
280Z1977's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-02-06
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Originally Posted by 1BADSS/SC
What the hell kind of an ignorant statement is that?? Let me see you get a job as an investment banker which makes millions without a masters degree. Ya know what any firm will say to you? Get lost.

This is how college vs non college jobs work:

college:

-garanteed a stable decent job ( depending on the degree ).
-education is free if you know how to work the system ( Air Force pays for my Bachlors, there is also tons of student aid out there that people can look into ).
-unless youre starting a business, or are in business with someone your college degree will allow a higher paying job than someone without one.

non college:

-most reputable high paying jobs require a Bachlors or higher, therefore getting a job that pays 6 figures+ without any degree is going to be extremely hard.
-knowing people is one of the best ways to get a good job without a degree.
-entry level jobs really dont pay squat, u need some sort of technical training/schooling of some sort.

I know a person who is in investment banking. He has a golf course, inground swimming pool, tennis court, mansion, etc., and he has a MBA. Unless youre Bill Gates and pull off a miracle, your average Joe Shmoe without a degree isnt going to be able to get these things and pull these huge salaries ( aka doctors, lawyers, etc ).

Either way, u need some sort of technical training/schooling to make good $$. Im sure your salary doesnt even come close to 6 figs.

Saying college is a waste is an ignorant statment Id expect from someone who isnt smart enough to pull good grades in college. School isnt for everyone, but now adays it is the BEST way to get a good paying job.
See C1705, I told you the lil kiddies would be crushed. I was just offered a job that would clear 80k a year easy. "Doing what?" Installing window coverings working less then 20(yes 20) hours a week. There are PLENTY of ways to get a good paying job that is easier then going to college. You even brought up the easiest way, start your own business. Point being if you are patient and keep your eyes open it is very easy to make lots of money. Do you know the % of people that graduate college with a degree in something and end up not even working in that field? Or even utilizing it's pay benefits?? Yet everyone is force fed college, "It's the only way to get a good job." BS, why pay to learn something that you can learn on a job?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 04:29 PM
  #168  
CynicX's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-11-06
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
See C1705, I told you the lil kiddies would be crushed. I was just offered a job that would clear 80k a year easy. "Doing what?" Installing window coverings working less then 20(yes 20) hours a week. There are PLENTY of ways to get a good paying job that is easier then going to college. You even brought up the easiest way, start your own business. Point being if you are patient and keep your eyes open it is very easy to make lots of money. Do you know the % of people that graduate college with a degree in something and end up not even working in that field? Or even utilizing it's pay benefits?? Yet everyone is force fed college, "It's the only way to get a good job." BS, why pay to learn something that you can learn on a job?

I agree and disagree. I never went to college and am doing great.

My ex-g/f is on her way to being a surgen at Hopkins in Baltimore. They wont even LOOK at you unless you have 7 years of college. After her 4 year she was accepted into some sort of appretice program, but she had to be an RN. Another job which REQUIRES college.

A have another friend in who programs stuff (he cant tell me exactly) for the government. He has secrety clearance. Another job that require at least 2-3 different certifications and degrees you can only obtain from college.

I agree that its possible to make good money without college. But not doing what you loving doing. IE. Saving lifes with surgery or working at the pentagon like those mentioned above.

My ex g/f is making around 50-60k now while they pay for her to goto college. She'll be making 400-600k when shes graduates. My friend that programs is probably making somewhere around 80-100k easily probably more and hes been there about 1 - 1 1/2 years with plenty of room for advancment. They are both around my age 24-25.

And I make more then both of them, but I work 10x as hard and have longer hours. I didnt goto college either.

What the hell kind of window covering are you installing for 80k a year working for someone? I dont pay my interior designer/installer 10k suppling my own material and it takes those people about a month and there is 4 of them. 10000 / 4 x 12 months = 30k. Hopefully your faster then them....

I would suggest to the younger then me crowd to find something you love. Then persue it, if it doesnt require college thats awesome. If it does then goto college.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 04:41 PM
  #169  
280Z1977's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-02-06
Posts: 1,187
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Originally Posted by CynicX
I agree and disagree. I never went to college and am doing great.

My ex-g/f is on her way to being a surgen at Hopkins in Baltimore. They wont even LOOK at you unless you have 7 years of college. After her 4 year she was accepted into some sort of appretice program, but she had to be an RN. Another job which REQUIRES college.

A have another friend in who programs stuff (he cant tell me exactly) for the government. He has secrety clearance. Another job that require at least 2-3 different certifications and degrees you can only obtain from college.

I agree that its possible to make good money without college. But not doing what you loving doing. IE. Saving lifes with surgery or working at the pentagon like those mentioned above.

My ex g/f is making around 50-60k now while they pay for her to goto college. She'll be making 400-600k when shes graduates. My friend that programs is probably making somewhere around 80-100k easily probably more and hes been there about 1 - 1 1/2 years with plenty of room for advancment. They are both around my age 24-25.

And I make more then both of them, but I work 10x as hard and have longer hours. I didnt goto college either.
I agree totally here and said that in one of my first posts. But how many hours will she work as a surgeon and how many does he work? I bet a lot.

Originally Posted by CynicX
What the hell kind of window covering are you installing for 80k a year working for someone? I dont pay my interior designer/installer 10k suppling my own material and it takes those people about a month and there is 4 of them. 10000 / 4 x 12 months = 30k. Hopefully your faster then them....

I would suggest to the younger then me crowd to find something you love. Then persue it, if it doesnt require college thats awesome. If it does then goto college.
Shutters(plantation blinds) mostly... $2.50 a sq.ft., average house we do is 700sq.ft. We also do the other blind style at $15 dollars per. My partner and me can do a 700sq.ft. house in 3 hours. So do the math.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 10:56 PM
  #170  
1BADSS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-05
Posts: 13,306
Likes: 0
From: UNDER YOUR BED
Originally Posted by 280Z1977
See C1705, I told you the lil kiddies would be crushed. I was just offered a job that would clear 80k a year easy. "Doing what?" Installing window coverings working less then 20(yes 20) hours a week. There are PLENTY of ways to get a good paying job that is easier then going to college. You even brought up the easiest way, start your own business. Point being if you are patient and keep your eyes open it is very easy to make lots of money. Do you know the % of people that graduate college with a degree in something and end up not even working in that field? Or even utilizing it's pay benefits?? Yet everyone is force fed college, "It's the only way to get a good job." BS, why pay to learn something that you can learn on a job?
I know that there are plenty of good ways to make good money. Hell the last deployment I went on I pocketed $5500 cash a month after taxes. Thats about an 80-85k a yr taxed salary. Im 21, and I can make 5500 a month if I deploy over seas. If I wasnt in school, I would probably be deployed right now.

However, I realize that the job I really want to obtain will pay much more in the long run, and making 5.5k a month is not worth my time right now. I need to get my masters degree to get the job I want, and I want to do it asap. Starting salary is in the 6 figs, and after 10 yrs it isnt unusual to be making millions. That is the type of money I want to be making, regardless of how hard it may be. In order to do that, I need my masters degree.

The people that dont use their degrees to their full potential are often people who major in a degree that isnt very flexible. For example, a degree in music will not help you unless you plan on doing something music related. A broader degree like business administration will be able to get you a job pretty much anywhere.

Unless you own a business, college is the "only way to get the highest paying jobs"
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WhineSSbaby
Problems/Service/Maintenance
3
Sep 1, 2020 12:39 PM
satisfied
Problems/Service/Maintenance
3
Oct 19, 2015 12:35 AM
CobaltSS 16
General Cobalt
8
Sep 12, 2015 02:43 PM
ROADKONE
Parts
1
Sep 9, 2015 02:32 PM
Bluelightning
War Stories
29
Sep 8, 2015 05:18 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 PM.