War Stories Post your racing wins. CobaltSS.net does not support or encourage street racing. Be smart and take it to the track.

Word to the wise... Do not try and race an Evo VIII!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 11:04 PM
  #51  
italstalnprd86's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
From: Norwich NY
how big of a bump?
Old Oct 6, 2005 | 11:44 PM
  #52  
Tofu's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
From: Houston
The Evo X kinda reminds me of the bad-robot in the first robocop movie hehe.
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 04:07 AM
  #53  
stic5's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 04-13-05
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted by DC52NV
http://www.mitsubishimotors.com/lanc...hi_models.html

mitsubishi site has them rated at the same hp for all three models.
You're right, they are all rated at the same HP by mitsu. But guess what? Mitsu lies! I have heard that the MR actually has more like 320 hp
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 12:28 PM
  #54  
italstalnprd86's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
From: Norwich NY
maybe 320 at the crank, the drive train in those eats power like its their job, i have seen the dyno results on the supposed 276 hp, and it turned out to be like 230 somehting...... that sucks really, however all wheel drive in the cobalt would be sick, and a hell of a lot of fun.......
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 02:05 PM
  #55  
stic5's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 04-13-05
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted by italstalnprd86
maybe 320 at the crank, the drive train in those eats power like its their job, i have seen the dyno results on the supposed 276 hp, and it turned out to be like 230 somehting...... that sucks really, however all wheel drive in the cobalt would be sick, and a hell of a lot of fun.......
Yeah you're right about the all wheel drive eating tons of power, and that's why an SS can give an Evo an excellent race. Our drivtrains are so much more efficient.
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 09:33 PM
  #56  
Liquid-R1's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-17-05
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by italstalnprd86
how big of a bump?
I think it was 10hp and I don't remember how much torque...
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 01:16 AM
  #57  
snapb1's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-10-05
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Athens, GA
Originally Posted by italstalnprd86
...the drive train in those eats power like its their job...however all wheel drive in the cobalt would be sick, and a hell of a lot of fun.......
Wouldn't that put you in the same boat as an Evo? Drivetrain loss wise? So what would be the use? AWD isn't nearly as fun as FWD... Gotta love torque steer!










lol
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 01:48 AM
  #58  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
your crazy, awd is so much better! i love it. that's why my 2 daily driver's are fwd and rwd, cause when i go out, i take the tsi. i love the launch, awd burnouts, and sliding through a field drifing in awd. it's crazy.
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 12:28 PM
  #59  
phxSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-05
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
From: Buckeye, Az
I'd rather own a '03-'04 cobra over an Evo for the same price.
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 01:40 PM
  #60  
Nocturn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-20-05
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Austin Tx
A GTO will surprise you in the corners, its not a Camaro.
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 01:54 PM
  #61  
pkskull77's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-04-05
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: ??????
Originally Posted by phxSS
I'd rather own a '03-'04 cobra over an Evo for the same price.
Good luck driving that thing in the rain/snow.
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 02:23 PM
  #62  
phxSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-20-05
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
From: Buckeye, Az
Originally Posted by pkskull77
Good luck driving that thing in the rain/snow.
Don't have to. I live int the desert. And if it floods, i drive our 4x4. So there ya go
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #63  
blab10's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-16-05
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: ABQ NM
A lot of people just look at the crank HP numbers and automatically think that an EVO (or any car for that matter) will beat another said car. Evos usually dyno around 230 at the wheels and weigh around 3400 pounds. So, a stock to stock race with an SS/SC would be pretty close from a roll but obviously from a dig AWD>FWD. Here is a link from a recent MT article. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...yno/index.html
They dynoed all 3 models (VIII, RS, MR) the same day one right after another and 3 different pulls each. Their highest dyno numbers of each were RS at 235, MR at 227 and VIII at 228.
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 07:42 PM
  #64  
pkskull77's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-04-05
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: ??????
Originally Posted by phxSS
Don't have to. I live int the desert. And if it floods, i drive our 4x4. So there ya go
Well you’re lucky enough to have two cars, some people can't, and in that case the Cobra isn’t a good choice. Even in moderate rain the Cobra is a bad car, so its tough to drive it everyday.

Furthermore, you have to ask yourself what’s your goal. Do you want to own a ź mile car, or a sports car; if you want a sports car than the EVO is the better choice. If you want to run the ź then get a Cobra.
Old Oct 11, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #65  
pkskull77's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-04-05
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: ??????
Originally Posted by blab10
A lot of people just look at the crank HP numbers and automatically think that an EVO (or any car for that matter) will beat another said car. Evos usually dyno around 230 at the wheels and weigh around 3400 pounds. So, a stock to stock race with an SS/SC would be pretty close from a roll but obviously from a dig AWD>FWD. Here is a link from a recent MT article. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...yno/index.html
They dynoed all 3 models (VIII, RS, MR) the same day one right after another and 3 different pulls each. Their highest dyno numbers of each were RS at 235, MR at 227 and VIII at 228.
While the EVO may only dyno in the upper 220 that’s more than enough to make that car go. I know some guys on this site are convinced that the SS puts down in the 220's, and trust me I’ve seen their dyno’s, but when they have been conducted in the correct gear they generally put down under 200. All of the high dynos that I've seen, have been done on dynos that always give you 20 or so more than you have, or are done in the wrong gear, or both. There might be some factory freaks out there, but most SS’s are not putting down 220, or any where near there for that matter.

The EVO does not weigh anywhere near 3,400 pounds. They are between 3, 197 and 3,285, depending on what model you purchase.

As far as a highway race goes I would imagine that the EVO would gain a car or two in most situations. Put the cars on a track and its not even close, the EVO is a far better car.

As far as aftermarket is concerned the weights are hopelessly slanted in favor of the EVO. The EVO engine has been around forever, and because the car is almost exactly the same in Japan, and Europe, there are far more tuners and companies working on this car. I feel very confident in saying that there will never be a day when the aftermarket for any Chevy let alone the SS is stronger.
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 10:00 AM
  #66  
Maximus's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-07-05
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg
I have raced a bone stock EVO 8 on a roll and I won by a small margin, I could see a SC/SS keeping up pretty good on a roll........
Old Oct 12, 2005 | 10:12 AM
  #67  
memphisr24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-20-05
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 1
From: Rutherford, NJ
From 10-50 The cobalt is in the lead, after that you get smoked. Trust me I know
Old Oct 13, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #68  
UtOhCop's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-12-05
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From:
Originally Posted by JonelZ
wow $31K for that thing! better of buying a GTO
You'd buy a GTO over an EVO?
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #69  
memphisr24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-20-05
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 1
From: Rutherford, NJ
I SURE WOULD! I love EVO's but I think the GTO is amazing. I originally wanted that car but since I didn't have the funds for it, it turned into a dream car (I have looked at used ones for 23,000 but insurance was what was going to kill me). The interior on the EVO, is SH*T. No offence to the EVO owners on this board or any EVO owner. It's still a nice car but for the money I'd take a GTO. Yeah, the GTO is plain in styling but that makes the perfect sleeper Yeah it's a bloated cavalier with a freakin ls2 400hp v8 in it that runs low 13's all day Personaly I think it looks amazing. The interior is to die for, the head unit sux on it though and so does the trunk space. But other than that, GTO 4 ME!
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 04:21 PM
  #70  
03EBZ06's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 09-17-05
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Near St. Louis
Originally Posted by UtOhCop
You'd buy a GTO over an EVO?
Why would you sound surprised? Everybody have different taste. Personally, I don't like look of EVO and not into 4-door sedan. Given choice of EVO and GTO, I would also go with GTO even though I would never own a GTO given other choices. Based on your posts in this thread, my guess is you would pick EVO over GTO. Different strokes for different people.
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 04:28 PM
  #71  
memphisr24's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-20-05
Posts: 6,313
Likes: 1
From: Rutherford, NJ
Originally Posted by 03EBZ06
Why would you sound surprised? Everybody have different taste. Personally, I don't like look of EVO and not into 4-door sedan. Given choice of EVO and GTO, I would also go with GTO even though I would never own a GTO given other choices. Based on your posts in this thread, my guess is you would pick EVO over GTO. Different strokes for different people.
Couldn't have said it any better myself. I've ridden in my friends EVO. Don't get me wrong, it's a beautiful (opinion based), fast car. However it rides hard I think because of its good suspension but you can't have both a good suspension and good ride quality. The dash is so plain. I seriously like my moms 1996 Toyota Corolla dash better. The leather racing seats are nice however but the cloth ones....yuck. That car is mainly built for speed. The GTO is almost like an old persons sports car. It doesn't attract too much attention but when you want to relive your childhood and go fast, you always have that option to keep up with C5 Corvettes and smoke EVO's.
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 10:08 PM
  #72  
Self's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-29-05
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: Europe
I love the 05 GTO, a friend took his to the track and ran a best of 14.3 on street tires, compared to a 05 mustang GT with slicks that did a best of 14.8.
Old Oct 14, 2005 | 10:57 PM
  #73  
plyboy-illest's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-02-05
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 0
From: Toronto (woodbridge)
there such hot cars if i had th emoeny id have one...
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 06:49 AM
  #74  
Liquid-R1's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-17-05
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
It really comes down to what type of racing you enjoy. Straight line, GTO. Twisties - Evo...
Old Oct 15, 2005 | 07:45 AM
  #75  
stic5's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 04-13-05
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted by Liquid-R1
It really comes down to what type of racing you enjoy. Straight line, GTO. Twisties - Evo...
I think a more accurate statement would be to say that if you care about anything besides the twisties and AWD (like accelleration, comfort, noise, interior quality) then you're probably gonna pick the GTO. A Cobalt SS even has a much nicer interior than the Evo. Also, people shouldn't underestimate the GTO in the twisties. It's a big car, but it's no slouch on a curve. I'd like to see a GTO and an SS race on a really curvy course. I wonder who would win?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 PM.