Wheels and Tires All about wheels and tires. What fits, show tires, and so on

Less Rotating Mass= Faster carr

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 03:31 PM
  #26  
Kahless's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-05
Posts: 13,359
Likes: 5
From: TX
Originally Posted by adam0416
These prices are from my sources... 1 used LSJ block = $800, wiseco pistons, IB spec rods = $1000. Installation of pistons, rods, bearings, re-installation of head and gaskets from your current motor = about $700. Yeah...5 grand minus $2500. Use the other $2500 to fab a turbo kit, which could easily include the intake mani, turbo mani, turbo, wastegate, BOV, piping, intercooler, down pipe, 3 inch exhaust, and HPTuners/ 660cc injectors. Boost the car to 20psi w/ an SC61 or better and make 400+ hp. Run low 12's, maybe even 11's if your lucky enough. So hush up and let people invest their money the way they want to.
weve already established hes a moron who thinks being a mechanic makes him the cobalt god. all he did was take a pic of the head and thinks were too dense to figure it out. ill bet he works on call backs half the day. but i imagine what he was getting at and you left out was the crank. the gm perf crank was 3000$ or so i thought.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 07:02 PM
  #27  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
no one ever mentions the downside of light wheels... a heavier wheel simply rides smoother than a light one.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 11:20 PM
  #28  
SpecialK's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 06-09-06
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
From: Lyons
But a bigger wheel rides liek **** becuase it screws with your suspension. Ask any owner of a SUV with 22" rims. Or better yet watch their lifty wagon ride like a horse drawn carrage.

Kemo, honestly. Is all you think about HP figues? The cobaltSS/SC has yet to honestly be given the proper tools to make power (idealy a better blower than what it comes with stock) and the build book is for a engine that makes 1000hp and runs on the track only. IMO the build book is useless for people makign a street driven car. It may point you to weak points in the stock block but it does not tell you what will breka in the engine next, what's the next bottle neck. ALl it tells you is to buy this part adn you'll go faster. Its' a sales catalog, not a bible.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 11:32 PM
  #29  
alleycat58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by joeworkstoohard
no one ever mentions the downside of light wheels... a heavier wheel simply rides smoother than a light one.
But this thread pertains to the performance, namely acceleration, benefits of a lighter wheel. Not pros and cons of lighter vs heavier.... I like my 18s for daily driving, but for auto-x or a track day, I'd want as light a wheel as possible.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 03:34 AM
  #30  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
Originally Posted by alleycat58
But this thread pertains to the performance, namely acceleration, benefits of a lighter wheel. Not pros and cons of lighter vs heavier.... I like my 18s for daily driving, but for auto-x or a track day, I'd want as light a wheel as possible.

performance is, to me, a pro and con debate. since 99% of us are using our cars for the street, i think that it's a very valid point that i made. honestly, i think even then 18 is a little large for this car. a 16-17 seems the ideal compromise (to me) between looks/tire/handling/durablity.

i just don't want to see some dumb kid toss 14 lb wheels on one of these and kill himself the first time he hits a bump and it hops off the damn ground.

does a lighter wheel mean a faster car? maybe. the same way that more power MAY mean a faster car. honestly, even with the LS' wheels a tires, the car can be fast if someone can take it to the limit in a controlled manner. any car can.

I don't race my car, hell, i don't even drive it hard. i just think that it's important that people that are not "in the know" get all sides of any mod before they whip out that checkbook.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 04:39 AM
  #31  
Nocturn's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-20-05
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Austin Tx
Its also note worthy that bigger rims may ride worse because of the lower profile tires required...which in itself are not the wheels fault...but a fault none the less.

If you think lighter wheels make a difference, try switching to a light weight crankshaft, with lightweight rods and pistons...changes the entire feel of the engine.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 04:47 AM
  #32  
zzzzzzzz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-06
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
From: chicago
[QUOTE=joeworkstoohard]performance is, to me, a pro and con debate. since 99% of us are using our cars for the street, i think that it's a very valid point that i made. honestly, i think even then 18 is a little large for this car. a 16-17 seems the ideal compromise (to me) between looks/tire/handling/durablity.

i just don't want to see some dumb kid toss 14 lb wheels on one of these and kill himself the first time he hits a bump and it hops off the damn ground.

does a lighter wheel mean a faster car? maybe. the same way that more power MAY mean a faster car. honestly, even with the LS' wheels a tires, the car can be fast if someone can take it to the limit in a controlled manner. any car can.

I don't race my car, hell, i don't even drive it hard. i just think that it's important that people that are not "in the know" get all sides of any mod before they whip out that checkbook.[/QUOTEme to. not a racer just an old fart. i have 15,s rim stock so if i upgrade to 16,s i should get a better ride right?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 08:51 AM
  #33  
synapse82's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-06-06
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, Missouri
Originally Posted by joeworkstoohard
performance is, to me, a pro and con debate. since 99% of us are using our cars for the street, i think that it's a very valid point that i made. honestly, i think even then 18 is a little large for this car. a 16-17 seems the ideal compromise (to me) between looks/tire/handling/durablity.

i just don't want to see some dumb kid toss 14 lb wheels on one of these and kill himself the first time he hits a bump and it hops off the damn ground.

does a lighter wheel mean a faster car? maybe. the same way that more power MAY mean a faster car. honestly, even with the LS' wheels a tires, the car can be fast if someone can take it to the limit in a controlled manner. any car can.

I don't race my car, hell, i don't even drive it hard. i just think that it's important that people that are not "in the know" get all sides of any mod before they whip out that checkbook.
Well i don't know about you, but my car never hit a bump and hopped of the ground when I had my galant. I do believe thats what your springs and dampers are for. To keep you planted.

You are right about getting both sides of the story before doing any mod. As for lighter wheels there are some disadvantages and one of the biggest ones is price IMO.

If you have never raced or driven your car hard, then how do you know about the effects of lighter or heavier wheels?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #34  
BLKSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-28-05
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa
Originally Posted by CoBOT
You say machine down the calipers like it is some giant chore. It is very easy and simple to grind a little bit off the calipers so that 15s clear.
Have you seen 16s on our cars? Obviously not. You cant grind that much off its just crazy.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:33 AM
  #35  
Kahless's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-05
Posts: 13,359
Likes: 5
From: TX
someone on this board has 15" wheels on his ss/sc i thought, and has DR's on. uses M&H tires i remember.

as for the lighter wheels debate im going to try some better tires than the stock conti's before i go all out with 17" 15lb wheels n tires.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:53 AM
  #36  
SUKXOST's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-06
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
From: Sumter, SC
HA HA HA Meno sure shut up quick!! LOL
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 10:59 AM
  #37  
alleycat58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by Kahless
someone on this board has 15" wheels on his ss/sc i thought, and has DR's on. uses M&H tires i remember.
15s won't fit without some sort of modification. 16s BARELY fit, 15s require spacers or grinding down the top of the calipers.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 11:39 AM
  #38  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
Originally Posted by synapse82
Well i don't know about you, but my car never hit a bump and hopped of the ground when I had my galant. I do believe thats what your springs and dampers are for. To keep you planted.

You are right about getting both sides of the story before doing any mod. As for lighter wheels there are some disadvantages and one of the biggest ones is price IMO.

If you have never raced or driven your car hard, then how do you know about the effects of lighter or heavier wheels?

i'm into E21 BMWs... and since the stock alloys on that care are approx 14lbs.... i've dealt with it. as far as hopping off the ground, it was slight exageration in the interest of making a point. but yes, price is an issue, also most lightweight wheels are simply not as strong as the stock or heavier wheels. i just don't feel that a real "Racing" wheel is a smart choice for a street car.

also, you're right about the shocks... but if someone is asking about wheels, at what point do they ask about dialing in the dampeners? just food for thought. good points you made.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 11:45 AM
  #39  
CoBOT's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 07-14-06
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: OK
Originally Posted by BLKSS
Have you seen 16s on our cars? Obviously not. You cant grind that much off its just crazy.
I've seen 16s and 15s. You can grind off that much... it isn't even a lot.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 11:57 AM
  #40  
synapse82's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 07-06-06
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, Missouri
Originally Posted by joeworkstoohard
i'm into E21 BMWs... and since the stock alloys on that care are approx 14lbs.... i've dealt with it. as far as hopping off the ground, it was slight exageration in the interest of making a point. but yes, price is an issue, also most lightweight wheels are simply not as strong as the stock or heavier wheels. i just don't feel that a real "Racing" wheel is a smart choice for a street car.

also, you're right about the shocks... but if someone is asking about wheels, at what point do they ask about dialing in the dampeners? just food for thought. good points you made.

I agree with you as well for the strength issues. I"m sure anyone willing to pay the price could find some lightweight wheels that are nearly as strong as "normal" weight wheels.

All in all I guess in answer to the actual topic at hand about less rotating mass = faster car, yes its true in a purist mathmatical form. Less rotating mass = faster for acceleration and direction change. But that's just theoretical. Make stuff light and its fast, but you give something in the process.

Good points for you as well joeworkstoohard.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 12:07 PM
  #41  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
Originally Posted by synapse82
I agree with you as well for the strength issues. I"m sure anyone willing to pay the price could find some lightweight wheels that are nearly as strong as "normal" weight wheels.

All in all I guess in answer to the actual topic at hand about less rotating mass = faster car, yes its true in a purist mathmatical form. Less rotating mass = faster for acceleration and direction change. But that's just theoretical. Make stuff light and its fast, but you give something in the process.

Good points for you as well joeworkstoohard.

oh yes, it would def be a faster car. how much faster is up for debate. i would venture to guess that you'd gain a lot more with money spent in other areas, at least on a drag strip or slolom. a good set of light AND strong wheels with needed tires for any car is at least....1500 USD (if we're talking performance gear). fifteen hundred bucks buys a lot, at LEAST a nice adjustable suspension.

to the original poster, buy whatever makes you happy, but understand 99% of wheel purchases are for looks. in the performance world, looking fast is almost as good (if not better) than being fast to most consumers.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 12:18 PM
  #42  
Kahless's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-05
Posts: 13,359
Likes: 5
From: TX

thats patathss' car, he uses saab 15" wheels and DR's. and im the 1% there. id rather have ugly wheels if itll save me 15% per wheel. but since i have a wife now she wont have "ugly" rims so i had to have a best of both worlds. she hates thin spokes
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 01:56 PM
  #43  
alleycat58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by Kahless
thats patathss' car, he uses saab 15" wheels and DR's. and im the 1% there. id rather have ugly wheels if itll save me 15% per wheel. but since i have a wife now she wont have "ugly" rims so i had to have a best of both worlds. she hates thin spokes
Yeah, I'm lucky enough to have gotten a deal on "fun" wheels and tires, I have 17lb rims (still rather heavy, but good for what's out there) with R-compounds. And I have yet to break them in .
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 04:27 PM
  #44  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
Originally Posted by alleycat58
Yeah, I'm lucky enough to have gotten a deal on "fun" wheels and tires, I have 17lb rims (still rather heavy, but good for what's out there) with R-compounds. And I have yet to break them in .
seventeen pounds is pretty lightweight if you ask me. esp if it's being used at all on public roads.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 06:16 PM
  #45  
Kahless's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-05
Posts: 13,359
Likes: 5
From: TX
i really wanted SSR competitions, but they were 400+ for 16's. they were 11lbs tho. then i saw several posts about the rims bending pretty easy and tirerack not doing anything about it
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 06:50 PM
  #46  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
Originally Posted by Kahless
i really wanted SSR competitions, but they were 400+ for 16's. they were 11lbs tho. then i saw several posts about the rims bending pretty easy and tirerack not doing anything about it
yeah, i don't think they're warranty bent rims. i wouldn't unless it was a special case.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 07:47 PM
  #47  
mrdoc442's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-17-06
Posts: 91
Likes: 2
From: Northwest
Fwiw

Originally Posted by Kemo
the vehicle is not a performance car lol.

And when i mean build up a engine, i dont mean to make it BIGGER, i mean to make it stronger.

And kudo's to you for wanting to race on a road course. It takes the most skill out of any other type of racing. Here, i'm used to seeing all these straight line runners. The only true driving skills are on a road course. Glad I finally see one person who also likes road course racing. But sorry, 250 is just not enough if you are going onto a road course. See what you can do to get it near 275-300. If it were a road course over here, 300 isn't mearly enough.

But really though, if you are going to put it onto a road course, the stock engine just wont do (even if forced air). Its just not built strong enough. Use all the GM performance engine parts (race block, cams, con rods, crankshafts) like the grand am guys do, and you'll be set. You CAN invest the 15,000 and turn the 2.0 into a 650 hp machine... but just not wise!

I just don't see the point in investing all this money into the car. its a daily driver My toy car is a 3rd gen camaro nearly pushing 500 horsepower. Thats my project car. The cobalt, just my every day ordinary car.

My reason for being here? only place that could give info on removal of the rear deck to the speaks.

"With the GM ECOtec global powerplant, we're making over 1000 horsepower, and the majority of the engine components are production parts," said Josh Peterson, GM Racing Sport Compact program manager. "It's simply amazing what can be done with this basic engine package." That being said, I seem to remember reading that the basic engine is good for 650 H/P before any serious internal parts are at risk. The 1987 Buick grand National V-6 engine, which was developed initially for Indy racing, was good for 500 H/P before any serious internal modifications needed to be done, just to give you a frame of reference. Don't sell the little ECOtec short. It is one of the most reliable engines to ever come out of GM, and with the new turbo engine, the Sky is the limit-no pun intended. "Rhys Millen's new Solstice is said to be making north of 500 H/P with the new turbocharged 2.0 L. ECOtec engine. Drag racing versions have topped 1400 H/P. So this version should not have trouble living." - Hot Rod magazine 9/2006 pg. 36. The ECOtec's and LS-2's continue to clean up in various motorsports with practically no failures. Read up on the success of the Time Attack Cobalt, and other road racing Cobalts with basically the Stage II engine. Unbelievably reliable.

I disagree with your notion that a "Cobalt is just my every day ordinary car." It might be ordinary to you, but that is because you fail to appreciate how special it truly is. My 2006 SS S/C is also a daily driver, but it is a "honkin" little scooter. I have a 1971 Olds Cutlass 442 Super Gas car. It dyno's 550+ H/P on nothing but race fuel. It is a 10.6 1/4 mile car at 5000' + altitude, and should be a 9 second car at sea level. Does not change my opinion of my Cobalt one particle. Like comparing apples and oranges.

As far as unsprung weight and rotating mass, the original drift of this thread, reducing wieght equals better performance, pure and simple. It's all about weight versus H/P. The principle is the same as it was 50 years ago, and it is not rocket science. There are two ways to go faster, increase H/P (and torque) or reduce weight.

Doc

Last edited by mrdoc442; Jul 25, 2006 at 11:41 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #48  
alleycat58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by joeworkstoohard
seventeen pounds is pretty lightweight if you ask me. esp if it's being used at all on public roads.
17lbs is PATHETIC for a "lightweight" rim. I don't consider anything over 15lbs to be TRULY "lightweight." I've run with 11lb rims before with absolutely no problems. If you have problems with lightweight rims and daily driving, you have some SERIOUS suspension issues going on. As in the car is NOT in driveable condition and should be parked IMMEDIATELY.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 10:43 PM
  #49  
joeworkstoohard's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-06
Posts: 5,577
Likes: 3
From: Gainesville, FL
Originally Posted by alleycat58
17lbs is PATHETIC for a "lightweight" rim. I don't consider anything over 15lbs to be TRULY "lightweight." I've run with 11lb rims before with absolutely no problems. If you have problems with lightweight rims and daily driving, you have some SERIOUS suspension issues going on. As in the car is NOT in driveable condition and should be parked IMMEDIATELY.

for a 17 inch, that's a pretty decent weight for everyday use. please remember that i'm talking about a daily driven car. but, driving down a highway at 75 miles an hour and hit a pot hole with an 11 pound rim and you can't tell me that it will act as nice as a 17-18 pounder
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:53 AM
  #50  
Kahless's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-10-05
Posts: 13,359
Likes: 5
From: TX
Originally Posted by mrdoc442
I have a 1971 Olds Cutlass 442 Super Gas car. It dyno's 550+ H/P on nothing but race fuel. It is a 10.6 1/4 mile car at 5000' + altitude, and should be a 9 second car at sea level.
friend??? id love an old 442. my drivers ed teacher had one but he let it rot away and eventually had it scrapped. i would have bought it from him. altho im not keen on race fuel. it has to be pump gas.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sl0wbaltSS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Nov 21, 2018 11:11 PM
OrangeCoba
Suspension
1
Oct 1, 2015 10:00 PM
importkiller
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
Sep 30, 2015 07:18 PM
nathan112i
Featured Car Showcase
41
Sep 30, 2015 07:12 PM
Josh@ottp
Supporting Vendor Deals & Group Purchases
2
Sep 5, 2015 07:46 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.