Bnr k04-gt28
I have no problem making and holding 100% WGDC on either OS. Im running a GMS1 OS now with stock MAP values to just compare notes, I haven't noticed anything that matters yet tho.
The DAL limiting to 255 in that one table worries me but it doesn't seem to have any problem disregarding that table too. So who knows lol.
The DAL limiting to 255 in that one table worries me but it doesn't seem to have any problem disregarding that table too. So who knows lol.
I have no problem making and holding 100% WGDC on either OS. Im running a GMS1 OS now with stock MAP values to just compare notes, I haven't noticed anything that matters yet tho.
The DAL limiting to 255 in that one table worries me but it doesn't seem to have any problem disregarding that table too. So who knows lol.
The DAL limiting to 255 in that one table worries me but it doesn't seem to have any problem disregarding that table too. So who knows lol.
[IMG]
Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG] I have the desired DC set to 100% the whole time it just will not see it as for the airload limits I have his car set at 275% DAL but it does not ever go above 255% DAL.
Weird my car and Drew"s both hit only ~80% in the midrange when I max the DC tables out to 100%. But with the same WG settings in that regular 09 file it holds 100% flat the whole time.
< image snip...>
I have the desired DC set to 100% the whole time it just will not see it as for the airload limits I have his car set at 275% DAL but it does not ever go above 255% DAL.
< image snip...>
I have the desired DC set to 100% the whole time it just will not see it as for the airload limits I have his car set at 275% DAL but it does not ever go above 255% DAL.
I've been playing with the Frankenstein '08 file this weekend on mine, but had some weird throttle body CEL's once. Forgot the codes though. My stock '08 read entire with the 3 bar MAPs.
The Desired Boost axis are different in the Proportional Max table between the Stock & GMPP files. 17.x in the stock, 23.x for the GMPP so you are getting into the higher column sooner raising the max, no?
I've been playing with the Frankenstein '08 file this weekend on mine, but had some weird throttle body CEL's once. Forgot the codes though. My stock '08 read entire with the 3 bar MAPs.
I've been playing with the Frankenstein '08 file this weekend on mine, but had some weird throttle body CEL's once. Forgot the codes though. My stock '08 read entire with the 3 bar MAPs.
Mine is fine as long as I leave the prop gain and all the axis settings alone. If I mess with the prop gain too much my car cuts out in 1st gear at WOT. It pulls spark and cut the injectors. Only first gear though 2nd, 3rd, 4th WOT is normal no issues at all. Not sure why my best guess is some sort of torque management.
It's not boosted. It won't cheat the correction factor as well as a turbo car.
Your stock turbo LNF also made 240 whp on your dyno. Your mustang dyno reads higher than any other mustang dyno I have ever seen before. Stock LNFs make 210-220 whp on Mustang dynos normally. Many cars I have tuned have reached their fueling limits on the stock turbo on E-47 at 24 psi and lower whp and wtrq numbers than your shop car on E-74. Hmm I wonder why? The torque limit on E-47 is about 425 wrtq and on E-74 it is about 10% lower or ~382 wrtq.
I also find it interesting how you post corrected hp numbers, but then throw out blanket statement power numbers for the fuel system. If the uncorrected hp limit remains a constant based on fuel system limitations, wouldn't the correction factor cause it to become a wide range of power levels based on when and where you dyno? That is something that most people don't think about.
Last edited by Matt M; May 10, 2011 at 12:19 AM.
can the urinating contest stop in here. Its much easier to make really good dyno numbers when you have unlimited access to a dyno. I also dyno'd my car stock on a dyno jet. Also this is a dyno sheet from when I did the superchips tune a long time ago. Also I don't think I am near a 125 trap, but a 120+ trap isnt out of the question, I trapped 114.7 with stock turbo and less mods in FL.
250/259 on a dyno jet at sea level.

250/259 on a dyno jet at sea level.
Say what you want, but you are wrong. I picked up 40whp when I went to a dynojet dyno day. We fully doucumented it. I also trapped 119mph on 26" slicks immediately after putting down 356 on our dyno. Are you saying that this car that just put down 393 will be trapping 125? Sorry, Term, you may have some experience tuning LNFs, but you are not going to get in here and talk **** about our dyno numbers. We back them up time and time again.
I also find it interesting how you post corrected hp numbers, but then throw out blanket statement power numbers for the fuel system. If the uncorrected hp limit remains a constant based on fuel system limitations, wouldn't the correction factor cause it to become a wide range of power levels based on when and where you dyno? That is something that most people don't think about.
I also find it interesting how you post corrected hp numbers, but then throw out blanket statement power numbers for the fuel system. If the uncorrected hp limit remains a constant based on fuel system limitations, wouldn't the correction factor cause it to become a wide range of power levels based on when and where you dyno? That is something that most people don't think about.
Say what you want, but you are wrong. I picked up 40whp when I went to a dynojet dyno day. We fully doucumented it. I also trapped 119mph on 26" slicks immediately after putting down 356 on our dyno. Are you saying that this car that just put down 393 will be trapping 125? Sorry, Term, you may have some experience tuning LNFs, but you are not going to get in here and talk **** about our dyno numbers. We back them up time and time again.
I also find it interesting how you post corrected hp numbers, but then throw out blanket statement power numbers for the fuel system. If the uncorrected hp limit remains a constant based on fuel system limitations, wouldn't the correction factor cause it to become a wide range of power levels based on when and where you dyno? That is something that most people don't think about.
I also find it interesting how you post corrected hp numbers, but then throw out blanket statement power numbers for the fuel system. If the uncorrected hp limit remains a constant based on fuel system limitations, wouldn't the correction factor cause it to become a wide range of power levels based on when and where you dyno? That is something that most people don't think about.


