08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion Discuss the 2008 - 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbocharged. On sale since the second quarter of 2008.

stage 2 guys are screwed

Old Jun 9, 2008 | 08:54 PM
  #51  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Originally Posted by UmeNNis
You do realize that the LS1 is ~345bhp right? ...And I already said that my SRT-4 dynoed at 305 to the wheels. Do you have any idea of what the hell you are talking about? The SRT-4 also weighs a bit less as well.

Remind me again of why it's not possible?
your post was worded to make it seem as though the cobalt beat the vette. I know what im talking about with the lsx motor pretty well. Your post just could have been worded better. No hard feelings
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 08:59 PM
  #52  
Darkmanx's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-04-07
Posts: 5,190
Likes: 2
From: FL.. FT LAUDERDALE/MAIMI
yAWN boring.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 09:00 PM
  #53  
UmeNNis's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-15-07
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, VA
Originally Posted by lsjwannabe
your post was worded to make it seem as though the cobalt beat the vette. I know what im talking about with the lsx motor pretty well. Your post just could have been worded better. No hard feelings
I see. Well, I guess it could have been worded a bit better, but it was implied and meant that the SRT can beat a stock LS1. The whole point was to say that on the same dyno, my SS/SC with intake/exhaust puts down 229 to the wheels.

I see now why you would have thought the corvette wasn't racing
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 09:06 PM
  #54  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Originally Posted by UmeNNis
I see. Well, I guess it could have been worded a bit better, but it was implied and meant that the SRT can beat a stock LS1. The whole point was to say that on the same dyno, my SS/SC with intake/exhaust puts down 229 to the wheels.

I see now why you would have thought the corvette wasn't racing
yeah, no doubt. I would of thought you would of done better honestly than that, maybe he was modded though.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 09:09 PM
  #55  
Mss26's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 02-17-08
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
From: Stuttgart
what about the GTO?


.......no just kidding....
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 09:32 PM
  #56  
red2001ss's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-31-08
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: Elyria, OH
Well with LSx motors in question, I have some info. LS1 motors whether it's in a Vette, F-Body, or GTO, 350hp 365tq, now that is for 2001 and up, 97-00 LS1's were 345hp and I think the tq was the same. The F-Body #'s were underrated (see a GM trend here) at 305HP 98-00 Z28/TA's and Formys and 310HP for 01-02 Z28/TA/Formy, while SS's and WS6's were 320HP 98-00, 325HP 01-02. I've seen stock Vette's F-Bodys and 04 GTO's all Dyno within 10hp of each other. LS1 is a LS1 is a LS1(quoted from LS1tech.com) LS2 Vettes and GTOs tend to Dyno anywhere from about 335 to 360 stock. But a 300Whp SRT4 will beat the 300whp Vette, SRT4 does have the advantage of weight.

As far as TC vs S2 SC, only time will tell. We need a nice overall test, the Dyno, then the same driver in both cars take them to the 1/4 mile and average 3 runs a peice. That "Should" settle the question.

That's my .02 for the evening.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #57  
Doc's Avatar
Doc
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-11-05
Posts: 9,438
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, Ca
Well, I am gonna put a ss/tc on the same dyno I've been too numerous times. It's not as exact as putting on two cars the same day but it will definately be a good comparison. If I can find a stage 2 car, I'll get it on there too. I just don't know of anyone local with a plain 'stage 2' car.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #58  
Area47's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
every car is different. every dyno is different. im more apt to believe a low reading dyno vs a superomgwtfbbq dyno number.

keep in mind, this is just one car i drove. so we shall see what happens.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 10:35 PM
  #59  
Badju587's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-09-07
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Severance, CO
I have a sinking feeling the higher up you go, the more screwed S2 gets.

The PCM is supposed to try to keep that 260/260 no matter what, ya?

Good luck for us people a mile up then... if the PCM really does boost the **** outta the motors up here, S2 is gonna be in more than a few rearviews.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 01:02 AM
  #60  
jarhead's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 05-15-08
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Badju587
I have a sinking feeling the higher up you go, the more screwed S2 gets.

The PCM is supposed to try to keep that 260/260 no matter what, ya?

Good luck for us people a mile up then... if the PCM really does boost the **** outta the motors up here, S2 is gonna be in more than a few rearviews.
I have no idea how fast a stage 2 is or isnt never drove one but my ss/tc doesnt have much if any turbo lag and seems really quick at 4,500 -6000 ft here the clutch does seem really light I hope it is stronger than it feels I really dont care if a stage 2 beats it or not it has plenty of power and speed for me and climbs mtns like its on flat land.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 01:12 AM
  #61  
wannabefastss's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-10-08
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Ada, Ok
Originally Posted by BriantheLion26
Will do. I am sure it will be a while. I can at least give you my .02 on the seat of the pants feel when I drive one.

I trap 105 on hot days and almost 109 when its cold out. When the ss/tc slips some if they are not within 105-109 they won't walk me from a roll anyhow. Their torque however will definitely help off the line and the no lift shift helps too.
i guess you guys don't realize that the when you spin off the line your trap speed tends to be higher then the norm.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 01:28 AM
  #62  
06_SS_S/C's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-26-07
Posts: 4,645
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
i know i dont have driver mod 11.9 like others on here, but you dont need any driver mod to just do a pull on a freeway. i wasn't impressed.

that was just comparing what i feels like my car does compared to this one.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 09:21 AM
  #63  
firemanfrank's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-07
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by 05redline
The TC is not going to beat down S2 SC's by any means. They're on equal ground.
Stage 2 hp will be close to an SS/T, but we get killed in the torque dept.

But that might be offset a bit by the SS/SC's more aggressive final drive ratio (4.0x vs. 3.8x if I remember correctly).
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 09:46 AM
  #64  
ralliartist's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-06-05
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 2
From: Seneca, South Carolina
Originally Posted by firemanfrank
Stage 2 hp will be close to an SS/T, but we get killed in the torque dept.

But that might be offset a bit by the SS/SC's more aggressive final drive ratio (4.0x vs. 3.8x if I remember correctly).
hell, I even forgot that. same exact trannys except the ss s/c has a bit more aggressive final drive. That has a small amount to do with it.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 11:41 AM
  #65  
lsjwannabe's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 01-23-06
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 0
From: on here
Originally Posted by Area47
every car is different. every dyno is different. im more apt to believe a low reading dyno vs a superomgwtfbbq dyno number.

keep in mind, this is just one car i drove. so we shall see what happens.
yeah me to, with the 253 whp i was trapping 86 in the 1/8th
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 12:01 PM
  #66  
SSdan's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 09-17-06
Posts: 6,266
Likes: 1
From: between heaven and hell
The only advantage the Stage 2 car will have is instant boost.

The TC I drove even at 4k had to spool up a tiny bit. But when I brake boosted, the thing took off.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 12:12 PM
  #67  
boostking's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-07
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: columbus
as soon as the beta is aval. it will not be so close. stage 2 with intake and exhaust against stock ss/tc will be very close my car with a 3in 42.5s and intake and exhaust trapped 103. which is what I have heard the ss/tc can do stock.....time will tell.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #68  
sherm420's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-20-07
Posts: 2,341
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
im gettin mine on the dyno next saturday hopefully
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #69  
mrniceguy8211's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 08-15-07
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
From: Brookfield CT
I want to race one
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 08:39 PM
  #70  
fyrebryan's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-22-07
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
So here's my question.. when Hahn comes out with a tune for the cobalt ss/tc what are the stage2 folks gonna do?
they took the HHR SS from 248whp to 283whp which i'm betting with a decent drive is low 14s.

so the question is... if that fat ass HHR SS can pull 283whp, i'm betting that the cobalt ss/tc can pull that also, and its what 350-450lbs lighter? if that cant pull low 14s to high 13s i dont know what can.

I say that ss/tc (both hhr and cobalt) is an easy 300+ hp engine.

By the way:
for the record I'm a 06 ss/sc owner and absolutely love it, however I think i'm going to trade to an HHR SS because I need the extra room.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 08:41 PM
  #71  
UmeNNis's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-15-07
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
From: Woodbridge, VA
Originally Posted by fyrebryan
So here's my question.. when Hahn comes out with a tune for the cobalt ss/tc.
they took the HHR SS from 248whp to 283whp which i'm betting with a decent drive is low 14s.

so the question is... if that fat ass HHR SS can pull 283whp, i'm betting that the cobalt ss/tc can pull that also, and its what 350-450lbs lighter? if that cant pull low 14s to high 13s i dont know what can.

I say that ss/tc (both hhr and cobalt) is an easy 300+ hp engine.
I'm pretty sure the SS/TC is more than 400lbs lighter... isnt it? lol
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #72  
fyrebryan's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-22-07
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, AL
HHR SS 3280lbs
Cobalt SS/tc 2975lbs

diff: 305lbs

If i do end up getting an HHR her name is gonna be FatAss
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #73  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by chris88z24
I honestly didn't think it felt that fast. *shrugs* Maybe I drove a dud, lol.
agreed
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #74  
BriantheLion26's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-08-06
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
From: Duncannon, PA
Originally Posted by wannabefastss
i guess you guys don't realize that the when you spin off the line your trap speed tends to be higher then the norm.
I pull 2.2 60's on street tires hot shot. I don't think that is too bad. No matter what 60' I had my traps were all consistent through out that same given day.

Once I see a stock ss/tc pull a 2.2 60' and run 13.7-13.8 I will give it some more credit. I will determine how I personally think they are once I test drive one. Hopefully they get one in here soon.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 12:30 AM
  #75  
07 SS/SC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-11-07
Posts: 4,741
Likes: 0
From: Bourbonnais IL
Originally Posted by BriantheLion26
I pull 2.2 60's on street tires hot shot. I don't think that is too bad. No matter what 60' I had my traps were all consistent through out that same given day.

Once I see a stock ss/tc pull a 2.2 60' and run 13.7-13.8 I will give it some more credit. I will determine how I personally think they are once I test drive one. Hopefully they get one in here soon.
You do realize one mag has already driven the ss/tc to a 13.9 at 100+mph right? 13.8-13.7 will not be hard in a stock ss/tc.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 PM.