I had rather a dyno read low than high... honestly... a Mustang dyno is what I consider to be more legit numbers... to each their own

 

if you want a dyno to read low just give it a negative correction.

Also people forget, there are several different types of dynojets.

 

there are.. however the "normal" one isn't a load based.. on the whole mustangs usually read more accurate

 

Gotcha, the one I use is load based, now I see where you are coming from.

Lets not lump these into mustang dyno's and dynojets then, how about load based dyno's are more accurate. (248x)

They can even do a negative load to get est. crank hp.

 

anyone have 350$ to send me so I can get one of these tuners? lol

 

what's awesome about this tune is that this is one the 91 oct tune... i can't wait for the 93!!

 

does anyone know when they are coming out with the 93 tune

 

I've emailed the technical department and asked them if they have an ETA for the 93 tune. Hopefully I will hear soon and when I do I will post it. I wonder how much of a difference in HP & TQ between the two...I wouldn't expect all that much, but any amount is good to me.

 

not willing to read threw 20 pgs. where do you pick up the hand held for 350? thx.

 

Auto Anything has it for around 350 I beleive until June 23rd,considering the cortex myself!

 

Auto Anything has it for around 350 I beleive until June 23rd,considering the cortex myself!

 

Auto Anything has it for around 350 I beleive until June 23rd,considering the cortex myself!

 

Auto Anything has it for around 350 I beleive until June 23rd,considering the cortex myself!

 

Wow quadruple post lol

What i want to know is why the HHR SS 5sp makes so much more power than the cobalt tune? 61hp and 80 ftlbs lol.

 

^^^Same reason the HHR makes more HP on the stage kit. Intake...

 

then why do Cobalts make the same whp(actually higher) than HHRs with custom tunes?

 

Better tuners??? No clue at all.

 

Less parasitic drag loss - don't they have different clutches/trannys than we do?

 

It is 94 and HUMID today, RPD still slaps to 300 and torque was still rockin 315ish, but after a couple back to to back spurts HP was around 270 and torque was 280's. IC may be a good upgrade. Still VERY HAPPY


hey drew did you have them send you a new tune because of your intake? How did you get 2 different 91 octane maps?

 

Maybe the cobalt GM flash is slightly less, because they wanted to market an intake as well and make the same numbers as the HHR. A money marketing ploy...DAMN THOSE COMMIE BASTARDS.

 

The HHR i believe has a 93 octane map, which were waiting on. Same clutch, same F35, same FE5, different body. Their airbox design is different, i know that much

 

If the Cobalt tune made the same power as the HHR my choice would be alot easier . I hope GM underated there stage 1 numbers Errr. Hell those HHR numbers are as good as lot of custom tunes.



Are Superchips gain's to the wheels ?

 

To the wheels, ENGINE IN CAR

 

One is the old map, the other is the updated one downloaded from their site. Also the 2nd time I dyno'd I did the SC tune runs first, not after 2 stock runs.

I am going to see how this responds to slight mods now though, I just deleted my cat behind the 02 sensor (rear side.) and deleted my resonator. The car sounds mean and I drove it for 40 miles and no CEL. Torque comes on quicker and top end has increased, so I am expecting to see some gains here. Maybe 5 or 6 WHP.

 

Huh??