2nd time at the track in my TC
but mph is an indicator of hp, and not of driving experience, right,
et would be an indicator of lack of traction/driving exp, or both.
great times,
I was just saying hahn's car without a dp or IC upgrade was moving a bit faster at the 1/8 mile, and not on stock tires either.
but none the less, some good top end, especially for the 2nd time out racing!
et would be an indicator of lack of traction/driving exp, or both.
great times,
I was just saying hahn's car without a dp or IC upgrade was moving a bit faster at the 1/8 mile, and not on stock tires either.
but none the less, some good top end, especially for the 2nd time out racing!
but mph is an indicator of hp, and not of driving experience, right,
et would be an indicator of lack of traction/driving exp, or both.
great times,
I was just saying hahn's car without a dp or IC upgrade was moving a bit faster at the 1/8 mile, and not on stock tires either.
et would be an indicator of lack of traction/driving exp, or both.
great times,
I was just saying hahn's car without a dp or IC upgrade was moving a bit faster at the 1/8 mile, and not on stock tires either.
Gosh!
You people don't read do ya... Says what lane in his post...
GEEEZ nobody reads or can't read his post, how sad, LOL!!!! Says what LANE and MODDS..... Damn!!!
Reaction times have NOTHING to do with your 60' or quarter mile at all..... He needs DR's..... I was there....A cold track at night ='s bad grip.... the AM sun (930-11 am) would warm the track surface enough to cut his 13.5 to a 13 or 12.9 alone.... It's also, LIKE HE SAID... his second time at the track and he's learning to understand the car\powerband more......
I'm waiting for someone with a TC to use the 4500 rpm launch dump<<< from a tune with drs or slicks w\grip, I'll bet 1.8 60's..... on a WARM TRACK....
DP and IC will give maybe 17-19 whp, enough to see nearly 109mph... We were spinning our tires nearly through the 1/8th.. I've the same bolt-on mods without CAI and mtr mts, I was squealing tires in all of second and most of third..... Track was just too cold!!!! A warm track in warmer temps 55-65*..... would make a huge difference.. I ran a 13.6 at 107mph in 100 degree air at 10 pm at a track alt of 1200 ft ( Firebird in Phx) and a DA of 4400' due to humidity in the 60% range and dew points in the mid 50 degree range.
GEEEZ nobody reads or can't read his post, how sad, LOL!!!! Says what LANE and MODDS..... Damn!!!
I'm waiting for someone with a TC to use the 4500 rpm launch dump<<< from a tune with drs or slicks w\grip, I'll bet 1.8 60's..... on a WARM TRACK....
DP and IC will give maybe 17-19 whp, enough to see nearly 109mph... We were spinning our tires nearly through the 1/8th.. I've the same bolt-on mods without CAI and mtr mts, I was squealing tires in all of second and most of third..... Track was just too cold!!!! A warm track in warmer temps 55-65*..... would make a huge difference.. I ran a 13.6 at 107mph in 100 degree air at 10 pm at a track alt of 1200 ft ( Firebird in Phx) and a DA of 4400' due to humidity in the 60% range and dew points in the mid 50 degree range.
Last edited by SportredSS; Nov 27, 2008 at 12:38 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
i havent raced alot but a front wheel line lock that has a button that has to be held down to enable, so when released it shuts off and goes to normal brake sounds like it would be helpfull for us to spool the turbo without doing a tripple pedal.
does that sound good or am i just a stupid tard?
does that sound good or am i just a stupid tard?
i havent raced alot but a front wheel line lock that has a button that has to be held down to enable, so when released it shuts off and goes to normal brake sounds like it would be helpfull for us to spool the turbo without doing a tripple pedal.
does that sound good or am i just a stupid tard?
does that sound good or am i just a stupid tard?
Seeing these traps and dyno numbers always makes me want to take a road trip down to the infamous psykostevo, haha.
To the OP, don't worry about this run, really. Next time you're out, I bet you'll cut 2.2's in the 60'. You'll do better each time. If you don't, I'll hold your family hostage and not even Harrison Ford will be able to save them. ;p
To the OP, don't worry about this run, really. Next time you're out, I bet you'll cut 2.2's in the 60'. You'll do better each time. If you don't, I'll hold your family hostage and not even Harrison Ford will be able to save them. ;p
Seeing these traps and dyno numbers always makes me want to take a road trip down to the infamous psykostevo, haha.
To the OP, don't worry about this run, really. Next time you're out, I bet you'll cut 2.2's in the 60'. You'll do better each time. If you don't, I'll hold your family hostage and not even Harrison Ford will be able to save them. ;p
To the OP, don't worry about this run, really. Next time you're out, I bet you'll cut 2.2's in the 60'. You'll do better each time. If you don't, I'll hold your family hostage and not even Harrison Ford will be able to save them. ;p
what do you mean? what are you running. Two similarly setup cars will almost always have a close trap speed, but just beceause a car traps one speed doesnt mean it can't trap significantly more at the same power level.
and ppl who do 14's have the same trap shouldnt theres be higher or mine be lower
well no offense but your 60' is horrid. generally more spinning off the line will lead to a higher trap speed, but a lower E.T. but i like i said this isn't always the case. If you spin enough or at the right times, or if you are geared a certain way, spinning may not effect the trap speed or even make it lower. In your case it probably kept it about what it would ahve been with like....a 2.0-2.1 60'. it might actually be higher with one of those 60's depending on how you drove.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sl0wbaltSS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Nov 21, 2018 11:11 PM
roth
Problems/Service/Maintenance
2
Sep 26, 2015 12:16 PM



