2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

its bad... really bad...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2010 | 09:03 PM
  #51  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by Gettinausernamesucks
Bill
you beat me to it. That thing has been detonating like a MO!!!!!!!!!. Better find out why or your new pistons won't last long. I'll be suprised if the ring lands on the stockers arent broken when you take them out. Adding timing advance below 2000 breaks them to.




The scoring is caused by either a broken second land, piston crown overheating from preignition causing it to overexpand and drag the cylinder wall on the exhaust side or ring end butt on the top ring from the same effect.

Judging by the position of the damage, it's the pistion coming apart between the second and third rings. I'll probably get to pull them tomorrow and find out for sure.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2010 | 09:31 PM
  #52  
sponge14's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-14-09
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
From: Anna, TX
Originally Posted by Gettinausernamesucks
Doesn't matter how hard its driven. At 24 PSI the turbo is running at 90 to 100% rated impeller speed. Anything beyond that just invites compressor surge and soaring charge air temps. Just slapping one of these go for broke cals into an LNF is just creating a grenade. I don't know Vince but he's doing his customers a great disservice because I know he knows that much boost is a ticking timebomb in an LNF with stock piston ring end gaps and a stock intercooler. Not to mention setting the turbo up for an untimely failure.
FWIW, Vince has said time and time again to his customers to NOT run that tune with stock Turbo, clutch, etc. If someone wants it after he tells them not to, who is he to not give the customer what they want? When I was getting him to re-tune my car I asked about it and the first thing he warned me about was grenading my motor since I am mostly stock. It was only meant to be a proof of concept on his HHR, but when he told people about it and they wanted it, he gave it to them.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2010 | 10:03 PM
  #53  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by sponge14
FWIW, Vince has said time and time again to his customers to NOT run that tune with stock Turbo, clutch, etc. If someone wants it after he tells them not to, who is he to not give the customer what they want? When I was getting him to re-tune my car I asked about it and the first thing he warned me about was grenading my motor since I am mostly stock. It was only meant to be a proof of concept on his HHR, but when he told people about it and they wanted it, he gave it to them.
This car was fairly well modded. Mods can't save the car from too much boost.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2010 | 11:07 PM
  #54  
Gettinausernamesucks's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-07-08
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Sorry guys. I just get a little frusturated when I see folks thrash a perfectly good motor when it could have been avoided. That said if they did it out of their own HP greed and decided to be lazy thats their own fault. If they did it because somone sold them on something that was pie in the sky shame on them. If vince is discouraging people from this then good on him.

Let me say this one time again. Anything over 24/25 LBS on the stock turbo and intercooler will grenade the motor. Its not a matter of if its when.

If you want to go more than that then you need to step up. Add a bigger turbo, bigger intercooler, and adjust the piston clearances and ring gaps.

OK
off the soapbox now.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 01:54 AM
  #55  
Stamina's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-09-09
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 5
From: Tejas
Originally Posted by Gettinausernamesucks
Bill
you beat me to it. That thing has been detonating like a MO!!!!!!!!!. Better find out why or your new pistons won't last long. I'll be suprised if the ring lands on the stockers arent broken when you take them out. Adding timing advance below 2000 breaks them to.

The scoring is caused by either a broken second land, piston crown overheating from preignition causing it to overexpand and drag the cylinder wall on the exhaust side or ring end butt on the top ring from the same effect.
Originally Posted by Gettinausernamesucks
Doesn't matter how hard its driven. At 24 PSI the turbo is running at 90 to 100% rated impeller speed. Anything beyond that just invites compressor surge and soaring charge air temps. Just slapping one of these go for broke cals into an LNF is just creating a grenade. I don't know Vince but he's doing his customers a great disservice because I know he knows that much boost is a ticking timebomb in an LNF with stock piston ring end gaps and a stock intercooler. Not to mention setting the turbo up for an untimely failure.

AF ratio being 11 or 12 ain't gonna fix charge air temps that are probably 250 to 300 degrees or ring end gaps that are to tight for that level of crown temp.

Think about this for a minute. ZZP is making what 425/450 on 24 lbs from a proper setup. Whats the difference why won't a stocker make that. AIRFLOW! Their working the head. SO what do you think 30 pounds in a stock head is doing. Thats right backing up in the ports. And what happens when the air backs up? It gets hotter than a MO!
Originally Posted by Gettinausernamesucks
Sorry guys. I just get a little frusturated when I see folks thrash a perfectly good motor when it could have been avoided. That said if they did it out of their own HP greed and decided to be lazy thats their own fault. If they did it because somone sold them on something that was pie in the sky shame on them. If vince is discouraging people from this then good on him.

Let me say this one time again. Anything over 24/25 LBS on the stock turbo and intercooler will grenade the motor. Its not a matter of if its when.

If you want to go more than that then you need to step up. Add a bigger turbo, bigger intercooler, and adjust the piston clearances and ring gaps.

OK
off the soapbox now.
Thanks a bunch for your input! This is actually very helpful to me as well as a few others locally that are interested in turbo swaps and engine builds.

I've been wondering what the proper ring end gap increase should be when going for more power for a while now...
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 03:02 AM
  #56  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
This car was not on stock intercooler, BTW.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 04:24 AM
  #57  
jimbos'ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-09-05
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
From: Killeen,TX
Originally Posted by Boosted_Cobalt09
::facepalm:: doing cyro on the crank isnt a bad idea since its good to more hp then i think anyone will be pushing out of this car anytime soon. honestly why waste money for an 18% strength increase on the rods. you already are going to have all this stuff out of the car. do it right. i understand he doesnt wanna spend money but honestly you pay to play. and from experiance with my camaro i know first hand. forced induction is not a cheap ball game but from what i read is going on with his treadstone stuff.... 5085 6262 and some other turbo.......hes going to need rods or his engine will be apart yet again. sorry if i sound like a complete dick but im calling it as i see it. this isnt soemthing that should be cheaped out on because he took a gamble in the first place.

i have a set of k1 rods that i picked up. nice piece. spend the extra few hundred and get rods that will last.
cryo FTW! i have overbored sleeves on my block and its been cryoed, crazy thing is its holding up to 23 psi on a 60 trim with no problems when onther guys with stock bores are splitting sleeves. just my .02
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 01:17 PM
  #58  
sponge14's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-14-09
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
From: Anna, TX
Originally Posted by ItalianJoe1
This car was fairly well modded. Mods can't save the car from too much boost.
Understood, and I didn't want to sound like I was talking about this guy's car, I just wanted to address what the other guy was saying about pushing a dangerous product on people....
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 03:07 PM
  #59  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
lesson today is simple. get a better tune. or e85.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 03:24 PM
  #60  
Matt M's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Think about this for a minute. ZZP is making what 425/450 on 24 lbs from a proper setup. Whats the difference why won't a stocker make that. AIRFLOW! Their working the head. SO what do you think 30 pounds in a stock head is doing. Thats right backing up in the ports. And what happens when the air backs up? It gets hotter than a MO!
I don't know where that was quoted from, but we are running a stock head on my car. The main difference is the turbo. The stock turbo quickly loses efficiency at anything over 30lbs/min. The S252et works well up to 45lbs/min by comparison.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 03:49 PM
  #61  
mkriebs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-12-09
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by Area47
lesson today is simple. get a better tune. or e85.
And E85 in the LNF can only be a dream atm.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 04:40 PM
  #62  
steven6870's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-06-08
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
From: NC
So the basic consensus is that the excess boost is the culprit, not neccessarily the tune itself. Techincally speaking if HPT could boost 30+ this could happen to a HPT car as well. I havent heard anything negative about the normal 22 PSI Trifecta tune. I imagine the driver of this car pretty much beat it pretty bad, considering the numerous vids, and "kill" list. So, with that being said, alot of boost + alot of WOT = ****?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 04:42 PM
  #63  
mkriebs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-12-09
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
It HAS happened to HPT cars, but to much more frequency on Trifecta cars. I think, most of the people running high boost on HPT, know how to log the car, and know how to diagnose the car to maintain a level of safety.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 07:47 PM
  #64  
Area47's Avatar
Rent me! per hour
 
Joined: 03-22-07
Posts: 24,161
Likes: 20
From: Still fixing others mistakes.
Originally Posted by steven6870
So the basic consensus is that the excess boost is the culprit, not neccessarily the tune itself. Techincally speaking if HPT could boost 30+ this could happen to a HPT car as well. I havent heard anything negative about the normal 22 PSI Trifecta tune. I imagine the driver of this car pretty much beat it pretty bad, considering the numerous vids, and "kill" list. So, with that being said, alot of boost + alot of WOT = ****?
gms1 + hpt = 30psi.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 07:52 PM
  #65  
mkriebs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-12-09
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by Area47
gms1 + hpt = 30psi.
Or the pill lol.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 07:52 PM
  #66  
Boosted_Cobalt09's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 02-19-09
Posts: 3,818
Likes: 0
From: Carol Stream
Originally Posted by jimbos'ss
cryo FTW! i have overbored sleeves on my block and its been cryoed, crazy thing is its holding up to 23 psi on a 60 trim with no problems when onther guys with stock bores are splitting sleeves. just my .02
theres nothing wrong with cyro.....just saying for the turbos he wants to throw at his car(percision 6262 which is good to 650) hes going to need rods. plus you can get the k1 rods for 435 from btf which are good to 800hp. might aswell just spend the extra couple hundred and not have to worry about where your rods are going to bend. but if hes not going to throw mass hp at the car then i think cyro is just fine.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #67  
mkriebs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-12-09
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
I am going to cryotreat my cranium for added strength.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2010 | 08:07 PM
  #68  
Edubs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-06
Posts: 4,976
Likes: 2
From: West Coast, FL
I had this same problem...

Reply
Old Apr 5, 2010 | 03:44 AM
  #69  
SSlobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-22-09
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 7
From: Kathmandu
Originally Posted by Edubs
I had this same problem...

Weak cranium?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2010 | 12:23 PM
  #70  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
#4 was... destroyed.


Reply
Old Apr 5, 2010 | 12:28 PM
  #71  
BLAZIN07SS's Avatar
I'm too JDM for you
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 06-05-07
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
damn! nice way to blow it up! LOL
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2010 | 12:29 PM
  #72  
twzted's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-02-06
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
From: Auburn Hills, MI
Well done,

I guess if your going to do it, do it right lol
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2010 | 12:31 PM
  #73  
ItalianJoe1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 11-01-05
Posts: 12,462
Likes: 61
From: Miami, FL
Top ring was still overlapped at the end. Piston fell out of the block when I took the cap off the rod (block was upside down at the time).

It also pushed some metal through the oil system. Main bearings are gouged pretty good. Crank looks fine though.

Last edited by ItalianJoe1; Apr 5, 2010 at 12:31 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2010 | 12:52 PM
  #74  
mkriebs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-12-09
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
I don't see the problem...


Lol, jk. At least the crank is good, that coulda got expensive.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2010 | 12:57 PM
  #75  
BradSi's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-24-07
Posts: 7,789
Likes: 0
From: Cincy
bravo.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 AM.