2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

LNF Oil Analysis

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 10:34 AM
  #1  
umrdyldo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-06-06
Posts: 11,663
Likes: 65
From: MO
LNF Oil Analysis




I'm not sure how readable this is. I will post mileage and oil type after i get feedback. Let me know if anything looks abnormal.

CU 3
FE 53
CR 3
AL 5
PB 1
SN 0
SI 9
NA 2
K 3
Mo 59
Ni 0
Ca 3741
Mg 25
Zn 973
P 834

ST 0
OXI 61
NIT 16
SUL 54
W None
A None
PFC 4.11
V100 9.2


ST = Soot
OXI= Oxidation
Nit = Nitration
Sul = Sulfation
W = Water
A= Antifreeze
PFC = Percent Fuel Content
V100= Viscosity @100C
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 10:37 AM
  #2  
JPizzle's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-28-06
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 2
From: Tampa, fl
I'm sooo confused.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 10:43 AM
  #3  
01Z2806TBSS's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-03-09
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Have you posted your results on www.bobistheoilguy.com ? If not I would post them over there and you will get a lot of great feed back from their forum members.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 10:59 AM
  #4  
redstarpa69's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-12-08
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: NEPA & Jacksonville FL
Originally Posted by 01Z2806TBSS
Have you posted your results on www.bobistheoilguy.com ? If not I would post them over there and you will get a lot of great feed back from their forum members.
That site is great "bobistheoilguy.com", got great info on different oils to use..
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 11:15 AM
  #5  
umrdyldo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-06-06
Posts: 11,663
Likes: 65
From: MO
I actually registered over there. Just waiting on Approval.

As for the test I used Amsoil 5W30. Oil had 8k miles on it. I changed the filter twice during that 8k miles.

As for the analysis, I believe all numbers are within spec or well below them. Which is great news. I am trying to narrow down the Viscosity, but I believe it finished somewhere in the region of a high SAE 20 and low SAE 30

Iron might be a little high

So really the only thing i was worried about was viscosity and it looks like I changed it at the right time. My mileage has went up.

I am very happy with the results and I am starting to Amsoil might be worth it.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 02:12 PM
  #6  
redstarpa69's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-12-08
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: NEPA & Jacksonville FL
Originally Posted by umrdyldo
I actually registered over there. Just waiting on Approval.

As for the test I used Amsoil 5W30. Oil had 8k miles on it. I changed the filter twice during that 8k miles.

As for the analysis, I believe all numbers are within spec or well below them. Which is great news. I am trying to narrow down the Viscosity, but I believe it finished somewhere in the region of a high SAE 20 and low SAE 30

Iron might be a little high

So really the only thing i was worried about was viscosity and it looks like I changed it at the right time. My mileage has went up.

I am very happy with the results and I am starting to Amsoil might be worth it.
I thought I read some where, Amsoil was in the top ten for perforance based oils. I use royal purple top five, but my old professor thinks highly of it.. for its properties compared to natural to sync based oils..
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 02:45 PM
  #7  
iboost's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: 12-22-08
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1
From: Rochester, New York
:Towely's voice from South Park:

"I don't know what the hells goin on..."
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2010 | 02:58 PM
  #8  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by umrdyldo
I actually registered over there. Just waiting on Approval.

As for the test I used Amsoil 5W30. Oil had 8k miles on it. I changed the filter twice during that 8k miles.

As for the analysis, I believe all numbers are within spec or well below them. Which is great news. I am trying to narrow down the Viscosity, but I believe it finished somewhere in the region of a high SAE 20 and low SAE 30

Iron might be a little high

So really the only thing i was worried about was viscosity and it looks like I changed it at the right time. My mileage has went up.

I am very happy with the results and I am starting to Amsoil might be worth it.
Iron does look a tad high for an engine fully broken in.. I've seen #s around 5-30 in other OAs. The fuel content was 4%? That seems a bit high for sure. I know these DI engines can cause excess fuel to wash into to combustion chamber.

Check this OA from Bobs site:

This is Turbo car using Amsoil. The Iron was around 30. The Fuel should be UNDER 2% as shown on the chart.This OA shows LESS than .5%!

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums...22#Post1984822

Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 10:05 AM
  #9  
Prestige_Worldwide's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 01-26-11
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Manassas, VA
I was thinking about switching over to Amsoil next oil change, do you think it's worth the extra $$?
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 12:22 PM
  #10  
IsItFast?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-21-08
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: Creedmoor, nc
Originally Posted by redstarpa69
I use royal purple top five, but my old professor thinks highly of it.. for its properties compared to natural to sync based oils..
Not to inflame another oil war, but Royal Purple is actually not the greatest of oils. Probably better than some of the cheap ones out there, but definately not the best oil, and certanly not worth what they charge. Read up on it sometime at bobistheoilguy.com or just do a google search. The last report I read found Royal purple had the highest amount of wear in the testbed.

Originally Posted by Prestige_Worldwide
I was thinking about switching over to Amsoil next oil change, do you think it's worth the extra $$?
I wouldnt use anything else in my f250 diesel. 300,000k miles and still running strong.
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 12:27 PM
  #11  
Dart_SI's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-15-09
Posts: 7,170
Likes: 2
From: kansas
maybe ill be switching to amsoil. that chart looks good.
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 01:05 PM
  #12  
Iam Broke's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 3,356
Likes: 1
From: Dark side of the Moon
Here's mine from 45k miles. I'm due to get another one in a few thousand. Fuel was less than 0.5%.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
UOA 9-10 .pdf (15.0 KB, 111 views)
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 01:10 PM
  #13  
Chevycobaltss3's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-24-08
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 1
From: Vine Grove Kentucky
Yeah im switching to amsoil. Ive already got the oil and ect just waiting for my miles to be like "CHANGE ME"
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 03:19 PM
  #14  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by umrdyldo



I'm not sure how readable this is. I will post mileage and oil type after i get feedback. Let me know if anything looks abnormal.

CU 3
FE 53
CR 3
AL 5
PB 1
SN 0
SI 9
NA 2
K 3
Mo 59
Ni 0
Ca 3741
Mg 25
Zn 973
P 834

ST 0
OXI 61
NIT 16
SUL 54
W None
A None
PFC 4.11
V100 9.2


ST = Soot
OXI= Oxidation
Nit = Nitration
Sul = Sulfation
W = Water
A= Antifreeze
PFC = Percent Fuel Content
V100= Viscosity @100C
FE looks a little high and FUEL looks definitely off at 4%...should be less than 1/2 that.
I'm using Pennzoil Ultra 5/30.

Last edited by ronn; May 12, 2011 at 04:32 PM.
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 03:28 PM
  #15  
Prestige_Worldwide's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 01-26-11
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Manassas, VA
Do you guys that use Amsoil switch the filter between changes at all?
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 03:49 PM
  #16  
umrdyldo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-06-06
Posts: 11,663
Likes: 65
From: MO
I'm not using amsoil anymore, but I do filter at 3k and oil at 6k
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 06:28 PM
  #17  
meldog21's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 03-21-10
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: CA
OMG!! I figured I was the only person here that regularly sends in my oil for analysis. You mean there is more than one other person on this forum that actually gets scientific test data and relies on it to make informed decisions on what to do with their car, say it isn't so. I thought all Cobalt owners just went by what "some guy" said, its louder so it must be faster, or butt dyno stories. If things keep going like this the next thing to happen will be meaningful before and after dyno charts that show actual improvement or losses when certain products are used or compared.

There might be some hope for the members of this forum, but I doubt it. We'll have to wait and see. I'll keep my fingers crossed and hope for the best while I continue to wade through countless pages of pointless and useless garbage posts.

Thanks to any and all that provide quality information on the forum.

Dog
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 10:25 PM
  #18  
themacguy's Avatar
Platinum Member
 
Joined: 05-24-10
Posts: 453
Likes: 5
From: Canada's Capital
Mobil 1 for the LNF.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taintedred07
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
32
May 28, 2022 03:47 AM
Zharrington_2010LNF
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
21
Feb 8, 2016 01:43 PM
Jesse
Parts
15
Oct 13, 2015 09:32 PM
Trav3480
Problems/Service/Maintenance
0
Oct 1, 2015 08:17 PM
patooyee
Wanted - What to buy - All categories
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:07 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM.