2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Who's putting down what....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 11:51 AM
  #26  
Tofu's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Tune only, numbers in sig. Haven't been to HRP yet....maybe this Friday.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 11:58 AM
  #27  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by revhigh18
i hit a 116 trap and a faster time than i have posted lol its not unbelieveable
On C-16.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 12:10 PM
  #28  
Mazdaboi318's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-03-08
Posts: 2,942
Likes: 1
From: Bossier City, Louisiana
i was barely traping 105 in my tuned car lol...

traction FTL!
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 12:20 PM
  #29  
Getreadytolose's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-08-08
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Terminator2
You guys trap speeds seem low. I tuned Getreadytolose and he trapped 110 in 95* Florida weather and he has a tune only. Never brought mine to the track but I estimate my car would run 12.7-13.0 at 116 mph.
Not to mention that was was my LAST run of about 12 runs... worst run being 14.0096 when I missed 3rd twice and a 2.20 60'. I averaged 13.6 @108-112. I had to be heatsoaked the entire time I was there, Its ~ 2hr drive just to the track. I did throw 100 octane in and it didnt feel any different.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 12:22 PM
  #30  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Mazdaboi318
i was barely traping 105 in my tuned car lol...

traction FTL!
Even wih no tracion off the line you should still trap higher than that. The car traps 103-104 stock most of the time.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 12:22 PM
  #31  
slowstang's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-06-08
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 1
From: east coast
Originally Posted by Terminator2
You guys trap speeds seem low. I tuned Getreadytolose and he trapped 110 in 95* Florida weather and he has a tune only. Never brought mine to the track but I estimate my car would run 12.7-13.0 at 116 mph.
The mph wasnt showing for getreadytolose runs. He said it "felt" like 110mph.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 12:29 PM
  #32  
Getreadytolose's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-08-08
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by slowstang
The mph wasnt showing for getreadytolose runs. He said it "felt" like 110mph.
RPD showed 110(give or take a mph as I am human) as I crossed if that counts.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 12:37 PM
  #33  
slowstang's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-06-08
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 1
From: east coast
The last 60ft(or 100ft?) of the track takes an average of your speed with two clocks. It's usually about 5mph slower than your actual speed.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 12:38 PM
  #34  
Tofu's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
From: Houston
So you didn't get a timeslip from any of those runs?
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #35  
Getreadytolose's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-08-08
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Florida
I have all of them, I can take some pics with the cell I suppose
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 12:46 PM
  #36  
Tofu's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-11-05
Posts: 2,533
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Oh no that's not necessary, I was just going to say your trap should be printed out on the timeslip if it wasn't displayed on the board at the track. Unless there was something else wrong with the print-outs.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 12:53 PM
  #37  
Getreadytolose's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-08-08
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Florida
The MPH wasn't on anybody's slips the entire day, it wasnt working
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #38  
Shibito's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 12,211
Likes: 11
From: Michigan
I'm hitting the track next weekend with just a tune, I'll post up times and traps after.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 01:05 PM
  #39  
07GatorSS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-27-07
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: PA.
this is sorta off topic, but not. in regards to how accurate the rpd is.. how accurate is it? lol ive put in on the hp/tqr screen and my friend and i have both seen it over 260 in tqr. not much over, maybe like 3-5 over. and im still bone stock with less than 500 on the clock. so i was curious how accurate it is
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 01:16 PM
  #40  
revhigh18's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-15-08
Posts: 2,878
Likes: 0
From: Lee's Summit MO
Originally Posted by Terminator2
On C-16.
nope
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 01:19 PM
  #41  
Getreadytolose's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-08-08
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Florida


I'll have more soon
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 01:23 PM
  #42  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by revhigh18
nope
So, you gained 3 mph magically? After how many 112 -113mph runs.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 01:24 PM
  #43  
slowstang's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-06-08
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 1
From: east coast
Originally Posted by Getreadytolose


I'll have more soon
Here's to compare a similar run of mine...i'd say in the conditons you ran that day it would have trapped 106.5-107.5

R/T - .158
60ft - 2.32
330ft - 6.02
1/8 - 8.94
MPH - 85.14
1000 - 11.40
1/4 - 13.51
MPH - 106.99
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 01:36 PM
  #44  
Getreadytolose's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-08-08
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Florida


Originally Posted by slowstang
Here's to compare a similar run of mine...i'd say in the conditons you ran that day it would have trapped 106.5-107.5

R/T - .158
60ft - 2.32
330ft - 6.02
1/8 - 8.94
MPH - 85.14
1000 - 11.40
1/4 - 13.51
MPH - 106.99
you very well may be correct, looking at similarities its hard to say otherwise... It was blistering hot, midway down the track the aits would get way better timing(from 140 ish to 100s) would advance and then its too late too improve the time

Last edited by Getreadytolose; Jul 27, 2009 at 01:36 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 10:27 PM
  #45  
Matt M's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
330whp, 375wtq, 12.1 at 114
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 10:30 PM
  #46  
Married w/children's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 04-29-09
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina yeehaww
Everyone should list their tuning source for comparison purposes. just a thought
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 11:35 PM
  #47  
Getreadytolose's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-08-08
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Matt M
330whp, 375wtq, 12.1 at 114
mods, 60ft?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 12:03 AM
  #48  
Matt M's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Getreadytolose
mods, 60ft?
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/drag-racing-52/zzp-lnf-update-new-track-times-178542/
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 12:13 AM
  #49  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
Originally Posted by CudaJoe
really? holy crap I've got a Lemon then!

Did you forget to press the turbo button?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
06MetallicBalt
Mid East
10
Jul 20, 2025 08:47 PM
Supercharged06SS
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
21
Dec 11, 2022 04:47 PM
Sl0wbaltSS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Nov 21, 2018 11:11 PM
Jesse
Stuff
0
Oct 1, 2015 05:47 PM
Tupp
Suspension
5
Sep 30, 2015 08:18 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.