brfs vs return style
If you are not prepared to get into it with me, then don't talk about our products. It's as simple as that. If you know that you can drop the idle pressure down just the same with the zzp setup, then why did you say that you can't get the car to idle as good? I'd like to hear your reasoning behind that statement.
But in vacuum the fuel pressure would be the base pressure set.
Return systems have a little more in the tuning then a referenced non return. Ifrs and ect, offsets will be dependant on the flow you have as the basic flow .. some usually do 42-45.. its dependant on the car and Injectors. Basically larger injectors like the less psi for a idle and ect.. the higher psi tens to cause a lil issue with high impedance..
I believe so. I raised the base pressure on mine to try to squeeze some more out of the 79# injectors I was running at the time on E85. It gave me a little more room, but sadly, not quite enough. So now I have the ID1000's.
Yah I will need to run larger than 80's when I go to 30psi... At 18 psi I am at about 75% I think and at 23 psi I am at around 89% I think.
My only thread was when I went twincharge I think, I scrapped that later on, and just went straight turbo.. Never looked back. My turbo was pushing I think 42-44lb/min at 23 psi.
Ok you were talking base pressure tuning not a difference in return vs non return tuning on a reference system?
Ok you were talking base pressure tuning not a difference in return vs non return tuning on a reference system?
FWIW, the factory setup is a return system. It just returns sooner. A lot of people refer to it as non-return, but that is obviously not correct.
Zzps fuel referenced systems are prob the best user friendly systems and good quality compared to most . most I have tuned were there kits. And I have done others and to install zzp is by far easier.
ok, I just misunderstood what you were saying too.
I believe not, gotta get your own and hook it up to the schrader valve.
I believe not, gotta get your own and hook it up to the schrader valve.
Last edited by SCcobaltSS; Feb 29, 2012 at 05:25 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I recommend running either return or returnless... But as it sits I'm doing a tvs fully built cammed ect lsj 1000cc with a referenced fuel system non return and full e85. And running a 12.3 afr and his idcs up top are 83-85%... So if your gonna run 80s and e, I recommend somthing higher in flow so you don't go static.
From my observations of this debate over the past fews years I have come to the following conclusions.
1. ZZP used to say that return style systems are useless but now offer them as an option on their site. They even offer the same Regulator as OTTP. Actually, right now, the site does not allow you buy the kit without a Fuel Lab regulator...
2. ZZP BRFPS (without the return setup) is good if you need just a little bit more fuel. Most people who need a lot more fuel and try to adjust the FP ending up breaking the adjustment screw/regulator. When they post for help with they end up getting scolded by ZZP for doing something they were not supposed to do. But ZZP always comes through to help them out. But first they make you look like an idiot! lol
3. I have not heard of anyone running a OTTP return style system ever complain about not having enough fuel. They can get it when they need it and not have to worry about breaking something in the kit.
4. Not to name drop but the person who made the most power with a TVS and E85 (and didn't blow his engine) was running the system from OTTP.
5. ZZP has gotten good results with their BRPFS buy turning up the FP when needed. IIRC, the first LSJ 2.3L stroker engine they built was running a M62, 60#, E85 and their BRFPS with the FP turned up to ~70psi. The made like 360whp with that setup. Their 2.4L LSJ stoker made over 400whp on the same setup but with 80# injectors.
6. As a "Return after the fuel rail option" Both kits are priced the same.
If I misspoke somewhere, please feel free to correct me.
What do you mean by "Higher in flow"? Injectors or a different fuel system?
From my observations of this debate over the past fews years I have come to the following conclusions.
1. ZZP used to say that return style systems are useless but now offer them as an option on their site. They even offer the same Regulator as OTTP. Actually, right now, the site does not allow you buy the kit without a Fuel Lab regulator...
2. ZZP BRFPS (without the return setup) is good if you need just a little bit more fuel. Most people who need a lot more fuel and try to adjust the FP ending up breaking the adjustment screw/regulator. When they post for help with they end up getting scolded by ZZP for doing something they were not supposed to do. But ZZP always comes through to help them out. But first they make you look like an idiot! lol
3. I have not heard of anyone running a OTTP return style system ever complain about not having enough fuel. They can get it when they need it and not have to worry about breaking something in the kit.
4. Not to name drop but the person who made the most power with a TVS and E85 (and didn't blow his engine) was running the system from OTTP.
5. ZZP has gotten good results with their BRPFS buy turning up the FP when needed. IIRC, the first LSJ 2.3L stroker engine they built was running a M62, 60#, E85 and their BRFPS with the FP turned up to ~70psi. The made like 360whp with that setup. Their 2.4L LSJ stoker made over 400whp on the same setup but with 80# injectors.
6. As a "Return after the fuel rail option" Both kits are priced the same.
If I misspoke somewhere, please feel free to correct me.
From my observations of this debate over the past fews years I have come to the following conclusions.
1. ZZP used to say that return style systems are useless but now offer them as an option on their site. They even offer the same Regulator as OTTP. Actually, right now, the site does not allow you buy the kit without a Fuel Lab regulator...
2. ZZP BRFPS (without the return setup) is good if you need just a little bit more fuel. Most people who need a lot more fuel and try to adjust the FP ending up breaking the adjustment screw/regulator. When they post for help with they end up getting scolded by ZZP for doing something they were not supposed to do. But ZZP always comes through to help them out. But first they make you look like an idiot! lol
3. I have not heard of anyone running a OTTP return style system ever complain about not having enough fuel. They can get it when they need it and not have to worry about breaking something in the kit.
4. Not to name drop but the person who made the most power with a TVS and E85 (and didn't blow his engine) was running the system from OTTP.
5. ZZP has gotten good results with their BRPFS buy turning up the FP when needed. IIRC, the first LSJ 2.3L stroker engine they built was running a M62, 60#, E85 and their BRFPS with the FP turned up to ~70psi. The made like 360whp with that setup. Their 2.4L LSJ stoker made over 400whp on the same setup but with 80# injectors.
6. As a "Return after the fuel rail option" Both kits are priced the same.
If I misspoke somewhere, please feel free to correct me.
1. We still sell the same type of kit that we always have. We still recommend the more simple kit for 99% of modders. We never said full length return kits are "useless." We stated that most people will not gain anything from them vs. our kit. We offer the full length return setup for custom race applications. If OTT is using the same regulator that we do, then they switched to that regulator after we started using them.
2. I have no idea where any of that is coming from.
3. Our kit does not add any kind of restriction to your fuel system, so that didn't make much sense.
4. We make hundreds more horsepower than that with our kit, so obviously the fuel regulator is not a factor.
5. See #4.
6. That could be correct.


