I just got dynod by zzp
I just got dynod by zzp
I had zzp do a pull with just my gm stg 2 and CAI. I got 239.6whp. Then I had them install the zzp mid-length header/dp combo and their tune and got 246.7whp. What do you guys think?
Joined: 08-27-07
Posts: 21,561
Likes: 4
From: Jacksonville, FL
wish my parents would pay for me to get parts
wait that is why i have a job and work on my own car and spent way too much buying tool
wait that is why i have a job and work on my own car and spent way too much buying tool
Last edited by chris06ss; Feb 12, 2009 at 12:53 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Sounds like an honest dyno OP. The header/DP made a good difference on my car
We've been going over the results for some time and will continue to work on it as time allows. We all expected more and I was discussing with Matt and Ryan. The strange thing was losing power when we tried dropping the OEM catback.
Ryan said pre-install #'s averaged about 237? I think? with 239 being the top run and he's guessing a real world 8-9WHP gain from adding the header/DP. We expected more. The car has a 3.1" pulley and we had bits of KR here and there. nothing bad, just 1 or 2 deg but enough to where dropping pulley size would probably be an issue. Dropping the stock catback did not allow for more timing either.
Matt is thinking winter gas is playing a factor. I'm wondering if is the 2.75" injen intake or the throttle body holding the car back a bit. Truth is we aren't certain. The stage 2 flash runs the car a little lean in lower rpms which increases power slightly but also causes KR to come in earlier, probably due to heat build up from being leaner. I wasn't there during the dyno testing so I don't know if any PCM work was done but mrchyzy16 could prob answer that.
Next we'll be doing some work and monitoring vacuum in the inlet and it's affect on performance, etc. I'm nearly finished with my HE tech article and I think you guys will find it enlightening or if nothing else interesting.
Ryan said pre-install #'s averaged about 237? I think? with 239 being the top run and he's guessing a real world 8-9WHP gain from adding the header/DP. We expected more. The car has a 3.1" pulley and we had bits of KR here and there. nothing bad, just 1 or 2 deg but enough to where dropping pulley size would probably be an issue. Dropping the stock catback did not allow for more timing either.
Matt is thinking winter gas is playing a factor. I'm wondering if is the 2.75" injen intake or the throttle body holding the car back a bit. Truth is we aren't certain. The stage 2 flash runs the car a little lean in lower rpms which increases power slightly but also causes KR to come in earlier, probably due to heat build up from being leaner. I wasn't there during the dyno testing so I don't know if any PCM work was done but mrchyzy16 could prob answer that.
Next we'll be doing some work and monitoring vacuum in the inlet and it's affect on performance, etc. I'm nearly finished with my HE tech article and I think you guys will find it enlightening or if nothing else interesting.
very nice. When I dynoed (results in sig) I had 42# stg II injectors. I odn't know if that's what the problem was, or if the tune needs work, but as you can see I was running a 2.9 that made the injectors go past IDC.
As we speak I have a 2.8, wideband, and dual gauge pod on the way. I have the 60's in my basement and I installed the h/e the other day. I'm also hoping to be around 270 with a proper tune now that I got the injectors right.
Good luck man and props.
As we speak I have a 2.8, wideband, and dual gauge pod on the way. I have the 60's in my basement and I installed the h/e the other day. I'm also hoping to be around 270 with a proper tune now that I got the injectors right.
Good luck man and props.
the Stage 2 & intake numbers are nice. but i'm a little dissappointed in the final numbers. i was thinking with a header/dp combo alone you'd gain around 10whp. but you only gained 7.1whp with a header/dp combo AND a ZZP tune...... that's odd.
anywho.... what were the torque numbers?
anywho.... what were the torque numbers?
Ya matt had to do the pcm tuning because without it, I was getting a shitload of kr with the gm stage tune. Ya I was hoping to break 250 but all in all, the whole car feels better. Like their is no more "bogging while shifting", it shifts real smooth.
It was like $600 with the parts , install, tuning, and dyno pulls.
It was like $600 with the parts , install, tuning, and dyno pulls.
Last edited by mrchyzy16; Feb 12, 2009 at 12:35 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
the same as with 42#s
what sizes/options were included? im assuming 1.75" primaries, but what about the DP?
We've been going over the results for some time and will continue to work on it as time allows. We all expected more and I was discussing with Matt and Ryan. The strange thing was losing power when we tried dropping the OEM catback.
Ryan said pre-install #'s averaged about 237? I think? with 239 being the top run and he's guessing a real world 8-9WHP gain from adding the header/DP. We expected more. The car has a 3.1" pulley and we had bits of KR here and there. nothing bad, just 1 or 2 deg but enough to where dropping pulley size would probably be an issue. Dropping the stock catback did not allow for more timing either.
Matt is thinking winter gas is playing a factor. I'm wondering if is the 2.75" injen intake or the throttle body holding the car back a bit. Truth is we aren't certain. The stage 2 flash runs the car a little lean in lower rpms which increases power slightly but also causes KR to come in earlier, probably due to heat build up from being leaner. I wasn't there during the dyno testing so I don't know if any PCM work was done but mrchyzy16 could prob answer that.
Next we'll be doing some work and monitoring vacuum in the inlet and it's affect on performance, etc. I'm nearly finished with my HE tech article and I think you guys will find it enlightening or if nothing else interesting.
Ryan said pre-install #'s averaged about 237? I think? with 239 being the top run and he's guessing a real world 8-9WHP gain from adding the header/DP. We expected more. The car has a 3.1" pulley and we had bits of KR here and there. nothing bad, just 1 or 2 deg but enough to where dropping pulley size would probably be an issue. Dropping the stock catback did not allow for more timing either.
Matt is thinking winter gas is playing a factor. I'm wondering if is the 2.75" injen intake or the throttle body holding the car back a bit. Truth is we aren't certain. The stage 2 flash runs the car a little lean in lower rpms which increases power slightly but also causes KR to come in earlier, probably due to heat build up from being leaner. I wasn't there during the dyno testing so I don't know if any PCM work was done but mrchyzy16 could prob answer that.
Next we'll be doing some work and monitoring vacuum in the inlet and it's affect on performance, etc. I'm nearly finished with my HE tech article and I think you guys will find it enlightening or if nothing else interesting.
[QUOTE=bernandovelasquez;3456901]
Yes you would need a tune. There are 106565483 threads about it.
I'm also curious as to what the DP size was.
I'm also curious as to what the DP size was.



