meth and E85
The Renewable Fuels Foundation states in its Changes in Gasoline IV manual, "There is no requirement to post octane on an E85 dispenser. If a retailer chooses to post octane, they should be aware that the often cited 105 octane is incorrect. This number was derived by using ethanol’s blending octane value in gasoline. This is not the proper way to calculate the octane of E85. Ethanol’s true octane value should be used to calculate E85’s octane value. This results in an octane range of 94-96 (R+M)/2. These calculations have been confirmed by actual octane engine tests."
i will stick with methanol since i already have my kit. i dont disagree that e85 is superior, i just dont agree that it gives higher octane ratings.
if your source is correct then i calculate with the equation (135+122)/2=128.5
i will stick with methanol since i already have my kit. i dont disagree that e85 is superior, i just dont agree that it gives higher octane ratings.
if your source is correct then i calculate with the equation (135+122)/2=128.5
Last edited by Redefined1; Jul 12, 2010 at 03:06 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
The Renewable Fuels Foundation states in its Changes in Gasoline IV manual, "There is no requirement to post octane on an E85 dispenser. If a retailer chooses to post octane, they should be aware that the often cited 105 octane is incorrect. This number was derived by using ethanol’s blending octane value in gasoline. This is not the proper way to calculate the octane of E85. Ethanol’s true octane value should be used to calculate E85’s octane value. This results in an octane range of 94-96 (R+M)/2. These calculations have been confirmed by actual octane engine tests."
i will stick with methanol since i already have my kit. i dont disagree that e85 is superior, i just dont agree that it gives higher octane ratings.
if your source is correct then i calculate with the equation (135+122)/2=128.5
i will stick with methanol since i already have my kit. i dont disagree that e85 is superior, i just dont agree that it gives higher octane ratings.
if your source is correct then i calculate with the equation (135+122)/2=128.5
EDIT:
I see what your doing now. Your doing the same thing as I was......look at methanol not methane.
wow this was 4 pages of grade A lolz
meth would be considered a something like a substitute for race fuel, it shouldn't be considered a substitute for e85, they're completely different animals
meth would be considered a something like a substitute for race fuel, it shouldn't be considered a substitute for e85, they're completely different animals
Last edited by selfinfliction; Jul 12, 2010 at 08:04 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
redfined....do us a favor and stfu.
E85>meth as far as power goes. they are both ~105 MOTOR octane, not research. research is higher and has many veriables. it is not accurate. motor octane is the actual AKI of gasoline. and methanol AND E85 are right around 105. idk where the **** you're getting this 150-160 bullshit but think about it this way. if methanol really were 160 octane but still less than $5/gal.....why the hell are people even bothering with 110, 112, 116, c16, q16, etc....instead of just going straight to methanol.
the reason that E85 is better is because that makes 100% of your fuel ~105mor. with methanol injection. it makes only a few % of your fuel ~105 mor. and the other 95% is still 91-93 pump gas. also E85 flows ~30% more fuel than pump gas
e85.
i was running a 2.8", 60's, 3" intake, full 3"catless header back, ottp h/e, and a 90/10 meth/water mix @10gph. and i made 273whp/250wtrq. if i were to eliminate the meth injection and retune on E85 and a proper fuel system i would be 300+whp/260-70+wtrq
(r+m)/2 is NOT actual MOR. it is an average. thats why majority of race fuels are listed as MOR because it is an actual number, not a calculated one.
i restate, again, for common ******* sense's sake. if methanol's octane rating was 150+ yet still $4/gal, then why the hell are people even bothering to use 110, 112, 116, c16, q16, etc at prices higher than $4/gal. oh yeah thats right. CAUSE METHANOLS OCTANE RATING IS ~105, THE SAME GOES FOR E85. E85 MAKES MORE POWER BECAUSE IT FLOWS 30% MORE THAN PUMP GAS AND IS 100% OF YOUR FUEL MIXTURE. METHANOL MAKES LESS POWER WITH THE SAME OCTANE RATING BECAUSE IT IT ONLY A SMALL FRACTION OF YOUR FUEL MIXTURE.
E85>meth as far as power goes. they are both ~105 MOTOR octane, not research. research is higher and has many veriables. it is not accurate. motor octane is the actual AKI of gasoline. and methanol AND E85 are right around 105. idk where the **** you're getting this 150-160 bullshit but think about it this way. if methanol really were 160 octane but still less than $5/gal.....why the hell are people even bothering with 110, 112, 116, c16, q16, etc....instead of just going straight to methanol.
the reason that E85 is better is because that makes 100% of your fuel ~105mor. with methanol injection. it makes only a few % of your fuel ~105 mor. and the other 95% is still 91-93 pump gas. also E85 flows ~30% more fuel than pump gas
The Renewable Fuels Foundation states in its Changes in Gasoline IV manual, "There is no requirement to post octane on an E85 dispenser. If a retailer chooses to post octane, they should be aware that the often cited 105 octane is incorrect. This number was derived by using ethanols blending octane value in gasoline. This is not the proper way to calculate the octane of E85. Ethanols true octane value should be used to calculate E85s octane value. This results in an octane range of 94-96 (R+M)/2. These calculations have been confirmed by actual octane engine tests."
i will stick with methanol since i already have my kit. i dont disagree that e85 is superior, i just dont agree that it gives higher octane ratings. HAHAHAHAH contradicting much???
if your source is correct then i calculate with the equation (135+122)/2=128.5
i will stick with methanol since i already have my kit. i dont disagree that e85 is superior, i just dont agree that it gives higher octane ratings. HAHAHAHAH contradicting much???
if your source is correct then i calculate with the equation (135+122)/2=128.5
i restate, again, for common ******* sense's sake. if methanol's octane rating was 150+ yet still $4/gal, then why the hell are people even bothering to use 110, 112, 116, c16, q16, etc at prices higher than $4/gal. oh yeah thats right. CAUSE METHANOLS OCTANE RATING IS ~105, THE SAME GOES FOR E85. E85 MAKES MORE POWER BECAUSE IT FLOWS 30% MORE THAN PUMP GAS AND IS 100% OF YOUR FUEL MIXTURE. METHANOL MAKES LESS POWER WITH THE SAME OCTANE RATING BECAUSE IT IT ONLY A SMALL FRACTION OF YOUR FUEL MIXTURE.
Last edited by EXsoccer1921; Jul 12, 2010 at 10:45 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
redfined....do us a favor and stfu.
E85>meth as far as power goes. they are both ~105 MOTOR octane, not research. research is higher and has many veriables. it is not accurate. motor octane is the actual AKI of gasoline. and methanol AND E85 are right around 105. idk where the **** you're getting this 150-160 bullshit but think about it this way. if methanol really were 160 octane but still less than $5/gal.....why the hell are people even bothering with 110, 112, 116, c16, q16, etc....instead of just going straight to methanol.
the reason that E85 is better is because that makes 100% of your fuel ~105mor. with methanol injection. it makes only a few % of your fuel ~105 mor. and the other 95% is still 91-93 pump gas. also E85 flows ~30% more fuel than pump gas
e85.
i was running a 2.8", 60's, 3" intake, full 3"catless header back, ottp h/e, and a 90/10 meth/water mix @10gph. and i made 273whp/250wtrq. if i were to eliminate the meth injection and retune on E85 and a proper fuel system i would be 300+whp/260-70+wtrq
(r+m)/2 is NOT actual MOR. it is an average. thats why majority of race fuels are listed as MOR because it is an actual number, not a calculated one.
i restate, again, for common ******* sense's sake. if methanol's octane rating was 150+ yet still $4/gal, then why the hell are people even bothering to use 110, 112, 116, c16, q16, etc at prices higher than $4/gal. oh yeah thats right. CAUSE METHANOLS OCTANE RATING IS ~105, THE SAME GOES FOR E85. E85 MAKES MORE POWER BECAUSE IT FLOWS 30% MORE THAN PUMP GAS AND IS 100% OF YOUR FUEL MIXTURE. METHANOL MAKES LESS POWER WITH THE SAME OCTANE RATING BECAUSE IT IT ONLY A SMALL FRACTION OF YOUR FUEL MIXTURE.
E85>meth as far as power goes. they are both ~105 MOTOR octane, not research. research is higher and has many veriables. it is not accurate. motor octane is the actual AKI of gasoline. and methanol AND E85 are right around 105. idk where the **** you're getting this 150-160 bullshit but think about it this way. if methanol really were 160 octane but still less than $5/gal.....why the hell are people even bothering with 110, 112, 116, c16, q16, etc....instead of just going straight to methanol.
the reason that E85 is better is because that makes 100% of your fuel ~105mor. with methanol injection. it makes only a few % of your fuel ~105 mor. and the other 95% is still 91-93 pump gas. also E85 flows ~30% more fuel than pump gas
e85.
i was running a 2.8", 60's, 3" intake, full 3"catless header back, ottp h/e, and a 90/10 meth/water mix @10gph. and i made 273whp/250wtrq. if i were to eliminate the meth injection and retune on E85 and a proper fuel system i would be 300+whp/260-70+wtrq
(r+m)/2 is NOT actual MOR. it is an average. thats why majority of race fuels are listed as MOR because it is an actual number, not a calculated one.
i restate, again, for common ******* sense's sake. if methanol's octane rating was 150+ yet still $4/gal, then why the hell are people even bothering to use 110, 112, 116, c16, q16, etc at prices higher than $4/gal. oh yeah thats right. CAUSE METHANOLS OCTANE RATING IS ~105, THE SAME GOES FOR E85. E85 MAKES MORE POWER BECAUSE IT FLOWS 30% MORE THAN PUMP GAS AND IS 100% OF YOUR FUEL MIXTURE. METHANOL MAKES LESS POWER WITH THE SAME OCTANE RATING BECAUSE IT IT ONLY A SMALL FRACTION OF YOUR FUEL MIXTURE.
Its not the 30% more fuel that cools the motor, Methanol can Make the same amount of power if you are running it as your main fuel, not worth it though really, $40 on 5 gl of 110 puts down the similiar power as e85
fail post. all i argued is what had higher octane. answer = methanol. mathmatically proven. i didnt disagree that e85 is worse then meth. read up on my posts. so plz stop acting like your someone coming in with a bunch of bs i never said. (r+m)/2 gets you the answer to your AKI of methanol. also just because methanol has higher octane doesnt make it better then e85. there are other variables.
i'm talking strickly methanol INJECTION vs E85. as E85 does not erode rubber/silicone gaskets and does not require a whole new fuel system design.
as far as the OP and the point of this thread goes. NO, NO mix of methanol injection will equal the power/cooling levels of an E85 setup.
and the reason behind this is;
i was running a 2.8", 60's, 3" intake, full 3"catless header back, ottp h/e, and a 90/10 meth/water mix @10gph. and i made 273whp/250wtrq. if i were to eliminate the meth injection and retune on E85 and a proper fuel system i would be ~300whp/260-70+wtrq
/thread.
Last edited by EXsoccer1921; Jul 12, 2010 at 11:09 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Its not possible to run a Meth Mixture that has the equivalent octane rating of E85.
You would need to run straight Methanol and almost no fuel. Once you add water and gas you just lost to E85.
You would need to run straight Methanol and almost no fuel. Once you add water and gas you just lost to E85.
stop it. seriously.
you can run max usable timing on meth and a stock blower. or e85 and a stock blower. then step up to my world. 2.6 on a tvs. 91 octane with meth WILL NOT sustain max usable timing. e85 can though. the rating is 105 octane. end of discussion.
110 octane and meth in my world can sustain the cylinder pressures.
tyr this one for fun. set your actual afr to 13.6, crank the timing to 36 degree's, and cram 27psi down it's neck and see what your precious meth and pump gas mixture does to the motor. hi. you just torched it. not on e85 though. at least not on mine when i fucked something up in the map. lost power. about 20whp. but did NOT knock. you have to figure out how far you want to go in power.
you can run max usable timing on meth and a stock blower. or e85 and a stock blower. then step up to my world. 2.6 on a tvs. 91 octane with meth WILL NOT sustain max usable timing. e85 can though. the rating is 105 octane. end of discussion.
110 octane and meth in my world can sustain the cylinder pressures.
tyr this one for fun. set your actual afr to 13.6, crank the timing to 36 degree's, and cram 27psi down it's neck and see what your precious meth and pump gas mixture does to the motor. hi. you just torched it. not on e85 though. at least not on mine when i fucked something up in the map. lost power. about 20whp. but did NOT knock. you have to figure out how far you want to go in power.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




