2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

ss/sc 300hp

Old Apr 18, 2009 | 07:55 PM
  #51  
Black SS/SC 06's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-27-07
Posts: 21,561
Likes: 4
From: Jacksonville, FL
Supporting mods FTW lol
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #52  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by Black SS/SC 06
Supporting mods FTW lol
car still goes 110 in the quarter and picks up 24-26mph on the back half, compare that to the "280whp" guys

must be pixie dust
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 07:57 PM
  #53  
Black SS/SC 06's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-27-07
Posts: 21,561
Likes: 4
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
car still goes 110 in the quarter? must be pixie dust
area is going to be pissed you stolez his pixie dust
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 07:58 PM
  #54  
BoostedYards86's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-03-07
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh PA
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
zach,



you arent running 25 degrees of timing on a 2.5 without a badass tuner and some race gas (if you could even do it then)

oh and your car doesnt make 285whp on a 2.8.

got any track times, id like to see what you are trapping off nitrous.

also, have you raced altiery54 before? i know him decently well and he claims to have put 2-3 on you last year when you claimed 280whp. funny part was that he only put down 257.
Thanks stu. I was trying to be nice, but you hit exactly what i was thinking.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 07:59 PM
  #55  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
nice? definition of this "word" please
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #56  
Black SS/SC 06's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: 08-27-07
Posts: 21,561
Likes: 4
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
nice? definition of this "word" please
Means you shave your ***** before you teabag him
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 08:02 PM
  #57  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
i lold

i would like to add, im not bragging about traps or anything like that, simply try to open some eyes as to why dynos dont mean ****.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 08:11 PM
  #58  
carbombss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-28-05
Posts: 1,726
Likes: 0
From: baltimore md
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 09:22 PM
  #59  
OntarioKev's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 11-16-07
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Stu, Mustang or Dynojet for your 250?

Kevin
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #60  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
I got into HIGH 280's with my LSJ with meth and a 2.7" pulley, with a better header I could've been very close!
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 01:16 AM
  #61  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by OntarioKev
Stu, Mustang or Dynojet for your 250?

Kevin
mustang.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 09:13 AM
  #62  
OntarioKev's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 11-16-07
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Only 250 on a mustang is a lot more impressive then only 250 on a dynojet, lol.

Kevin
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 11:06 AM
  #63  
HOT CARLS SS's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-04-07
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Hamilton, Ont.
But like he said dyno numbers don't mean ****...its the mph trap at end of the quarter that tells how the car is running. If you are running 110mph means your in the mid to high 12's in the 1/4 mile.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #64  
startingline05's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-14-07
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 1
From: Hinesville ga
Originally Posted by HOT CARLS SS
But like he said dyno numbers don't mean ****...its the mph trap at end of the quarter that tells how the car is running. If you are running 110mph means your in the mid to high 12's in the 1/4 mile.
depending on your 0 to 60 foot time
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 12:17 PM
  #65  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by startingline05
depending on your 0 to 60 foot time
330 is just as important
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #66  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by hatrickstu
330 is just as important
It's all important... the total package!
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 01:02 PM
  #67  
OntarioKev's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 11-16-07
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Dyno numbers are a decent guide, but your track numbers aren't perfect either. I can't compare my numbers at my track to someones numbers at a different track, or for that matter at the same track in different weather conditions.

Kevin
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #68  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by OntarioKev
Dyno numbers are a decent guide, but your track numbers aren't perfect either. I can't compare my numbers at my track to someones numbers at a different track, or for that matter at the same track in different weather conditions.

Kevin
yes you can. your times and DA tell the whole story.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 02:04 PM
  #69  
OntarioKev's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 11-16-07
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Standardizing from DA isn't 100% accurate, as well as varying track prep keeps you from 100% comparing between the same track on different days, not to mention different tracks, as prep changes all the time at the same track, and varies hugely from track to track.

Kevin
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 02:13 PM
  #70  
startingline05's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 11-14-07
Posts: 2,712
Likes: 1
From: Hinesville ga
Originally Posted by OntarioKev
Standardizing from DA isn't 100% accurate, as well as varying track prep keeps you from 100% comparing between the same track on different days, not to mention different tracks, as prep changes all the time at the same track, and varies hugely from track to track.

Kevin
+1 altitude, temp, what spray they use to spray the track, all makes a difference on how u run
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 02:15 PM
  #71  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by OntarioKev
Standardizing from DA isn't 100% accurate, as well as varying track prep keeps you from 100% comparing between the same track on different days, not to mention different tracks, as prep changes all the time at the same track, and varies hugely from track to track.

Kevin
just because you dont hook doesnt mean the unit of measure isnt exactly the same. you have a given repeatability error in EVERY dyno on EVERY pull. you run the same length at every 1/4 track, therefore the times are directly comparable. you just have to factor in the corrected elevation to get a more accurate comparison.

Originally Posted by startingline05
+1 altitude, temp, what spray they use to spray the track, all makes a difference on how u run
never said it doesnt effect how you run, but just because you dont hook doesnt mean its not an accurate measure, it just means you are running slower times. thats like arguing you cant compare two times if one car has dr's and one doesnt.

Last edited by hatrickstu; Apr 19, 2009 at 02:16 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 02:19 PM
  #72  
Stiner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-06-06
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Pontypool, Ontario
I love how people on this site want 300whp but they dont want a blower/turbo swap and they dont want to do anything to the engine
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #73  
hatrickstu's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-03-05
Posts: 15,395
Likes: 0
From: Ar-kan-sas
Originally Posted by Stiner
I love how people on this site want 300whp but they dont want a blower/turbo swap and they dont want to do anything to the engine
it can be done
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 05:06 PM
  #74  
1badBlueberrySC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-23-08
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Once again... I know of one on a 2.7 made 292... I was in the mid to high 280's on the stock header, 2.7 and meth!

It can be done, it has been done....
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2009 | 05:08 PM
  #75  
RedEcotecSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-13-07
Posts: 7,520
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
Once again... I know of one on a 2.7 made 292... I was in the mid to high 280's on the stock header, 2.7 and meth!

It can be done, it has been done....
then you know me.... i fail at making power
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 AM.