Tvs 1900 lsj build
02-03-2012, 05:00 PM
#302
So would if it were ran that way, would it draw in unmetered air?
with a open air filter it will draw unmetered air in it needs to be sealed
Should I instead just cap the intake and run the pcv line to that moroso can with the breather and just let it vent. Similar to a breather on the oil cap, just without the mess?
with a open air filter it will draw unmetered air in it needs to be sealed
Should I instead just cap the intake and run the pcv line to that moroso can with the breather and just let it vent. Similar to a breather on the oil cap, just without the mess?
if you use a atmosphere breather in the system it will
So under a vacuum with the breather it won't draw in air thru the breather and into the intake?
yes it will
I understand how it wouldn't under wot due to it being positively pressurized. All the vapors, exhaust gases would just go out the breather.
I'm just going to get that nice baffled moroso billet oil/seperator...
yes it will
I understand how it wouldn't under wot due to it being positively pressurized. All the vapors, exhaust gases would just go out the breather.
I'm just going to get that nice baffled moroso billet oil/seperator...
02-04-2012, 04:15 PM
#307
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 04-06-06
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not yet. Vortech is trying to get me to buy there AWD dyno for 50k lol Its brand new never ever used lol I guess they paid 100k for it. I might get a engine dyno first then the chassis dyno a bit later.
Maybe
I know my new ported head will take what the 2300 can give.
Maybe
I know my new ported head will take what the 2300 can give.
Last edited by euthanasia; 02-04-2012 at 04:16 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
02-04-2012, 04:16 PM
#308
All depends
Plugged some numbers in
If we can have a 4.5" pulley made for the TVS 1900.
Depending on how well the head/cam combo flow, it should only rob 30-35 hp and stay above 70% isentropic efficiency. Everything else will follow suit..
The funny part is it will **** out cfm wise what the TVS 1320 does on a 2.5-2.7 pulley depending on the rpm.
I need to see how it pans out with the 1900 PSI wise vs RPM. If it ends up being to small, I'll purchase a 2300.
Plugged some numbers in
If we can have a 4.5" pulley made for the TVS 1900.
Depending on how well the head/cam combo flow, it should only rob 30-35 hp and stay above 70% isentropic efficiency. Everything else will follow suit..
The funny part is it will **** out cfm wise what the TVS 1320 does on a 2.5-2.7 pulley depending on the rpm.
I need to see how it pans out with the 1900 PSI wise vs RPM. If it ends up being to small, I'll purchase a 2300.
Last edited by 100% METH; 02-04-2012 at 04:36 PM.
02-04-2012, 04:43 PM
#309
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: 04-06-06
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 1,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All depends
Plugged some numbers in
If we can have a 4.5" pulley made for the TVS 1900.
Depending on how well the head/cam combo flow, it should only rob 30-35 hp and stay above 70% isentropic efficiency. Everything else will follow suit..
The funny part is it will **** out cfm wise what the TVS 1320 does on a 2.5-2.7 pulley depending on the rpm.
I need to see how it pans out with the 1900 PSI wise vs RPM. If it ends up being to small, I'll purchase a 2300.
Plugged some numbers in
If we can have a 4.5" pulley made for the TVS 1900.
Depending on how well the head/cam combo flow, it should only rob 30-35 hp and stay above 70% isentropic efficiency. Everything else will follow suit..
The funny part is it will **** out cfm wise what the TVS 1320 does on a 2.5-2.7 pulley depending on the rpm.
I need to see how it pans out with the 1900 PSI wise vs RPM. If it ends up being to small, I'll purchase a 2300.
02-04-2012, 10:41 PM
#311
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-29-06
Location: california
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Moderator
02-05-2012, 01:17 AM
#316
Senior Member
Join Date: 09-29-06
Location: california
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
02-05-2012, 02:21 AM
#318
The in gear modifier in under fueling in hptuners
its based on a multiple of 0-2.0. Stock is set to 1.0 so it just multiples by 1 and lets the other modifiers do what you set them too.
So I'm assuming if you set the in gear modifier to 2.0. It will multiply what ever you set fuel to cut off @ by 2. And since our ecm limits to 8192... 8192 x 2 = 16,384 rpm...
Ah forgot to mention the in gear modifier in hptuners is based on coolant temperatures. You can control redline based on your coolant... kinda handy feature
its based on a multiple of 0-2.0. Stock is set to 1.0 so it just multiples by 1 and lets the other modifiers do what you set them too.
So I'm assuming if you set the in gear modifier to 2.0. It will multiply what ever you set fuel to cut off @ by 2. And since our ecm limits to 8192... 8192 x 2 = 16,384 rpm...
Ah forgot to mention the in gear modifier in hptuners is based on coolant temperatures. You can control redline based on your coolant... kinda handy feature
