I still know why they didn't install a remote mount turbo so the engine bay wasn't so crowded. Remote mount turbo back by the exhaust would have been smarter.

I'm still diggin it though.

 

I was told they aren't as powerfull as a turbo closer to the motor?

 

The GM stage 3 is 280 the MOPAR stage 3 is 355

 

Now what kinda work would be needed for the ecotec to handle that kinda power?

 

(tipping my hat to Mopar)

 

the turbo would lag for a week and under the car the turbo would be exposed to all the elements and would not have long life

 

isnt that 355 with race fuel?

 

MOPAR reccmonds that you use 100 octane but u can run on HOM withwater/alc injection some people have even used sunoco 94 and octane booster

 

Yep. TWIN-Charging ROCKS!!!

 

dude i cant even imagine the top end power of such a beast

 

not to mention the traction issues at the low end

 

Whatever, I said by to that the day I got a tuner car.

 

Did anyone else notice there's no belt on that engine? I bet they just mocked it up for the show, and it's not drivable yet... Still, a good sign of things to come...

BTW... im new... considering a Cobalt SSsc, a move up from my 2000 Prelude SH

 

No joke, I actually drooled......

 

Id have to say man, go take one for a test drive. It all depends on how u think it feels.... but welcome none the less

 

is that twin superchargers??

 

hmm the belt is gone but here is another thought ... imagine hitting a bump on the road with that filter so close WAM BAM SNAP

 

turbo charger super charger

 

oh, i see, niiiiiceeee!!!

 

Thank you... I think i will, Right.... NOW...

 

There is a belt there if you look close. The pulleys are shiny and the belt isn't. plus pulleys are set in where the belts go not out.

 

There's a belt on here?

 

I don't see one...

 

i don't see 1?? huh

 

^^^Nope