2.0L LSJ Performance Tech 205hp Supercharged SS tuner version. 200 lb-ft of torque.

Twin Charged! ! !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2005, 03:03 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Chevypowered's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-05-05
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The pulley where the supercharger goes directly down. And you can see it on the pulley. Without a belt you could see the shiney part of the pulley where the belt would be.
Old 11-03-2005, 03:18 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
Alex47's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-03-05
Location: new jerzy
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there is a belt
Old 11-03-2005, 03:19 PM
  #53  
Senior Member
 
undrgrndcobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-28-05
Location: Southeast, TX
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok had to stare and the pic for 5 minutes but i found it
Old 11-03-2005, 03:26 PM
  #54  
Senior Member
 
97cavie24ls's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-14-05
Location: phoenix , az
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jymontoya
Did anyone else notice there's no belt on that engine? I bet they just mocked it up for the show, and it's not drivable yet... Still, a good sign of things to come...

BTW... im new... considering a Cobalt SSsc, a move up from my 2000 Prelude SH

it has the belt on it

ive seen it


ill take a better pic when i get over there today
Old 11-03-2005, 03:27 PM
  #55  
Senior Member
 
Chevypowered's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-05-05
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 2,303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I WIN
Old 11-03-2005, 03:29 PM
  #56  
Senior Member
 
VaMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-07-05
Location: US
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't this priced somewhere near $8000 and $10,000? What the hell is the point in it? For that much you could bullet proof your internals and do a twin screw. Plus SS/SC owners wouldn't have to change their decals...
Old 11-03-2005, 03:32 PM
  #57  
The Stig
 
MarcS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-05
Location: New York
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is no way some pipe, a manifold, and something like a t3 turbo, will cost $8k.
Old 11-03-2005, 03:36 PM
  #58  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Co27SSKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-05
Location: NJ
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I say we call in Lingenfelter and get a TT on the LSJ. Or some LPE Magic...
Old 11-03-2005, 03:36 PM
  #59  
Senior Member
 
VaMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-07-05
Location: US
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was a thread over the summer where the company that was doing this said that they estimate that it would be at least over $8,000 total.
Old 11-03-2005, 03:39 PM
  #60  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Co27SSKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-20-05
Location: NJ
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VaMP
There was a thread over the summer where the company that was doing this said that they estimate that it would be at least over $8,000 total.
WWWAAAAAAATTTTTT THATS NUTS! how i'd bet theres only like 5-6 ppl on her willing to spend that much... (me being 1) but its not worth it!@
Old 11-03-2005, 03:43 PM
  #61  
The Stig
 
MarcS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-05
Location: New York
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That was Gravana, they abandoned that project as far as I know.

They reported having to move around components in the engine compartment.

What you see in this thread is a simplified turbo system that feeds the blower. I get the feeling that Gravana was full of it.
Old 11-03-2005, 03:50 PM
  #62  
Senior Member
 
VaMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-07-05
Location: US
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's a lot more to twin charging then just adding a turbo system guys. That's what costs a lot of money. I think a modified M62 setup or a M90 or twin screw swap would be more realistic.
Old 11-03-2005, 03:51 PM
  #63  
Senior Member
 
2006ArrivalBlueSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-24-05
Location: GTA, Ontario
Posts: 1,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MarcS
That was Gravana, they abandoned that project as far as I know.

They reported having to move around components in the engine compartment.

What you see in this thread is a simplified turbo system that feeds the blower. I get the feeling that Gravana was full of it.
They probably had a falling out with GM and used the project as an excuse to abandon their relationship.
Old 11-03-2005, 03:54 PM
  #64  
Senior Member
 
OniMirage's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-14-05
Location: Phx, AZ
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2006ArrivalBlueSS
They probably had a falling out with GM and used the project as an excuse to abandon their relationship.
that makes sense
Old 11-03-2005, 04:11 PM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
VaMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-07-05
Location: US
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2006ArrivalBlueSS
They probably had a falling out with GM and used the project as an excuse to abandon their relationship.
Or realized the money pit in which they were creating. If the actual demand for a product is lower then the cost to design and manufacture, why bother.
Old 11-03-2005, 04:26 PM
  #66  
Junior Member
 
Ghalterman_usmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-05-05
Location: Al Anbar, Iraq
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VaMP
Or realized the money pit in which they were creating. If the actual demand for a product is lower then the cost to design and manufacture, why bother.
makes sense!!
Old 11-03-2005, 04:28 PM
  #67  
p7x
Senior Member
 
p7x's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-15-05
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alex47
355hp>280hp
GO SRT-4
1) Stage III from sema is only 264.
2) 355 ...only on race fuel. Actaully 310.
3) If thats your thinking stage III is 340 with NOS.
4) Twincharging (guessing) should easily be over 300.

Just a few points.
Old 11-03-2005, 04:32 PM
  #68  
Member
 
dimeo09's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-08-05
Location: NY
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by p7x
1) Stage III from sema is only 264.
2) 355 ...only on race fuel. Actaully 310.
3) If thats your thinking stage III is 340 with NOS.
4) Twincharging (guessing) should easily be over 300.

Just a few points.
srt4 starts with like 30 etc hp to start.....
Old 11-03-2005, 04:33 PM
  #69  
The Stig
 
MarcS's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-11-05
Location: New York
Posts: 6,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by dimeo09
srt4 starts with like 30 etc hp to start.....

They are not comparing the cars in their stock form.
Old 11-03-2005, 04:37 PM
  #70  
Senior Member
 
Dman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-20-04
Location: USaaayyyy
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sweet...i like, now i want numbers....i want numbers BAD
Old 11-03-2005, 04:46 PM
  #71  
Senior Member
 
Alex47's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-03-05
Location: new jerzy
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VaMP
Wasn't this priced somewhere near $8000 and $10,000? What the hell is the point in it? For that much you could bullet proof your internals and do a twin screw. Plus SS/SC owners wouldn't have to change their decals...
There is a company that is twincharging the mini cooper S and it is like $6000 installed. They dynoed it at 250HP to the wheels with a stock exhaust on a 1.6 and tiny intercooler.
Old 11-03-2005, 05:22 PM
  #72  
Member
 
UtOhCop's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-12-05
Location:
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Total waste of money. With the money spent you could do forged pistons/rods and a TS.
Old 11-03-2005, 05:26 PM
  #73  
Senior Member
 
VaMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-07-05
Location: US
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Alex47
There is a company that is twincharging the mini cooper S and it is like $6000 installed. They dynoed it at 250HP to the wheels with a stock exhaust on a 1.6 and tiny intercooler.
Okay add more piping, more installtion fees, and more expensive computer tuning equipment.
Old 11-03-2005, 05:29 PM
  #74  
Senior Member
 
Alex47's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-03-05
Location: new jerzy
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VaMP
Okay add more piping, more installtion fees, and more expensive computer tuning equipment.
Mini is a BMW based company so that would be more expensive. Not the chevy
the only extra pricing would be of there was a front mount intercooler.
Old 11-03-2005, 05:34 PM
  #75  
p7x
Senior Member
 
p7x's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-15-05
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 5,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dont forget when ppl are the first to do something they're probably gonna charge alot and from what i have been reading this setup isnt as complicated as other setups so i guess we'll just have to wait and see.


Quick Reply: Twin Charged! ! !



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 AM.