An upgrade even for the tvs guys :) Twinscrew
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
I'm not sayin you should or shouldnt, but dont bash it man until further testing is performed. Its good to see that people still want to offer upgraded blowers for us SS/SC guys ya kno?
Member
Joined: 07-13-09
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton
^I wish I had your blower lol
I understand wanting to offer us more SC options but it says that the setup is good for cars in the 300hp range. I can't see anyone spending that much on the blower (alone) to make less power than a TVS for the same price
I understand wanting to offer us more SC options but it says that the setup is good for cars in the 300hp range. I can't see anyone spending that much on the blower (alone) to make less power than a TVS for the same price
Joined: 12-30-07
Posts: 14,079
Likes: 197
From: NEPA
P.S. The H62 is a wonderful blower. To bad they didnt make more of them, or put them into production.
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
Joined: 05-18-07
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Its night and day more efficient than the stocker. Even way more efficient than a tvs.
Takes less hp to drive. Makes less heat.
And who said the only option was going to be the stock size
We will also have a larger unit for the higher hp people. just don't want everyone to feel like bigger is always better. there are guys running 1.3l tvs but will run faster with the 1 L twin screw. Just because of the effincty and the mid range the extra hp it takes to dive the unit.
I think most people will be shocked how much extra hp some people will make going from a m62 with a 2.7 pulley to a 1L (57 ci) twinscrew with the same size pulley. Remember the iat will be dramatically lower most peoples pully sizes is limited to compressor heat than the raw x psi.
Then iof course the max effort guys people looking into turbo swaps etc are more than likely going to want the 1.46L version.
Takes less hp to drive. Makes less heat.
And who said the only option was going to be the stock size
We will also have a larger unit for the higher hp people. just don't want everyone to feel like bigger is always better. there are guys running 1.3l tvs but will run faster with the 1 L twin screw. Just because of the effincty and the mid range the extra hp it takes to dive the unit.
I think most people will be shocked how much extra hp some people will make going from a m62 with a 2.7 pulley to a 1L (57 ci) twinscrew with the same size pulley. Remember the iat will be dramatically lower most peoples pully sizes is limited to compressor heat than the raw x psi.
Then iof course the max effort guys people looking into turbo swaps etc are more than likely going to want the 1.46L version.
Its night and day more efficient than the stocker. Even way more efficient than a tvs.
Takes less hp to drive. Makes less heat.
And who said the only option was going to be the stock size
We will also have a larger unit for the higher hp people. just don't want everyone to feel like bigger is always better. there are guys running 1.3l tvs but will run faster with the 1 L twin screw. Just because of the effincty and the mid range the extra hp it takes to dive the unit.
I think most people will be shocked how much extra hp some people will make going from a m62 with a 2.7 pulley to a 1L (57 ci) twinscrew with the same size pulley. Remember the iat will be dramatically lower most peoples pully sizes is limited to compressor heat than the raw x psi.
Then iof course the max effort guys people looking into turbo swaps etc are more than likely going to want the 1.46L version.
Takes less hp to drive. Makes less heat.
And who said the only option was going to be the stock size
We will also have a larger unit for the higher hp people. just don't want everyone to feel like bigger is always better. there are guys running 1.3l tvs but will run faster with the 1 L twin screw. Just because of the effincty and the mid range the extra hp it takes to dive the unit.
I think most people will be shocked how much extra hp some people will make going from a m62 with a 2.7 pulley to a 1L (57 ci) twinscrew with the same size pulley. Remember the iat will be dramatically lower most peoples pully sizes is limited to compressor heat than the raw x psi.
Then iof course the max effort guys people looking into turbo swaps etc are more than likely going to want the 1.46L version.
All of the comparisons i've seen.. a twin screw really shines over 14psi compared to a roots or tvs type..
However, I'd like to see real world results showing the 1L making more power than a 1.3 tvs.. seems like a stretch..
However, I'd like to see real world results showing the 1L making more power than a 1.3 tvs.. seems like a stretch..
I too would like to see a comparison, but I have heard the volumetric eff for a twin screw far surpasses a roots style blower in high boost applications
