An upgrade even for the tvs guys :) Twinscrew
I will withhold judgment (and my TVS) until some dyno testing is done on our cars.
The 1.0L is not worth my time if its only good for 300whp. I'm breaking 300whp on the TVS with the stock pulley, no cooling mods, and a half-assed exhaust. So I doubt I'm pushing the TVS out of its efficiency range
Still alot of room to improve with the 3.15" pulley. Better flowing exhaust and some cooling, should put me further into the 300's. Then I can still drop pulley sizes and not be pushing the blower too hard.
However, 1.47L twin screw = *squirt*
The 1.0L is not worth my time if its only good for 300whp. I'm breaking 300whp on the TVS with the stock pulley, no cooling mods, and a half-assed exhaust. So I doubt I'm pushing the TVS out of its efficiency range
Still alot of room to improve with the 3.15" pulley. Better flowing exhaust and some cooling, should put me further into the 300's. Then I can still drop pulley sizes and not be pushing the blower too hard. However, 1.47L twin screw = *squirt*
I just want to point out to 383_Stroker post. There are different gens of blowers and rotor designs.
The stocker i believe is a 5th gen eaton rotor design and the tvs would be there 6th gen blower design. Remember how everyone ranted and raved about the new rotor design and how its so much better. Even for the same size blower.
Lysholm use a 2nd gen rotor. and that's the old stuff
I will post up the compressor map soon with the tvs overlay. Gains are huge...
The stocker i believe is a 5th gen eaton rotor design and the tvs would be there 6th gen blower design. Remember how everyone ranted and raved about the new rotor design and how its so much better. Even for the same size blower.
Lysholm use a 2nd gen rotor. and that's the old stuff
I will post up the compressor map soon with the tvs overlay. Gains are huge...
dude i want! i just keep getting more and more excited...but obviously need numbers and everything else to prove this is a huge upgrade for those of us that still have the m62
i just keep getting more and more excited...but obviously need numbers and everything else to prove this is a huge upgrade for those of us that still have the m62
Senior Member
Joined: 03-12-07
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 1
From: Columbus, Ohio
Good Read on TVS versus Twin Screw superchargers. Its explained on a pretty elementary level too..
TVS vs. Twin-screw.
Also, let me state.. I am a HARD CORE fan of twin screw superchargers.. they didn't didn't make one when i bought the TVS =)
TVS vs. Twin-screw.
Also, let me state.. I am a HARD CORE fan of twin screw superchargers.. they didn't didn't make one when i bought the TVS =)
if you follow this link, make sure you read the whole thread, as the only accurate graph comparison is not made until the last post.
A little more info, assuming its the correct model:
http://boostecus.com/images/stories/...2012.10.09.pdf
www.sprintex.com.au/files/Blower_Calculator.xls
devilsown, any chance you could get us a compressor map from sprintex to compare against the M62?
http://boostecus.com/images/stories/...2012.10.09.pdf
www.sprintex.com.au/files/Blower_Calculator.xls
devilsown, any chance you could get us a compressor map from sprintex to compare against the M62?
Last edited by Pyros777; Oct 19, 2010 at 04:48 PM.
Isn't that the unspoken law of ss.net anyway? Surprised you even felt the need to mention it. lol
I probably wont give up my TVS, but learning about other options never hurt anybody, except maybe vendors who overestimate their target audience..
I sincerely hope thats not the case here.
I probably wont give up my TVS, but learning about other options never hurt anybody, except maybe vendors who overestimate their target audience..
I sincerely hope thats not the case here.
