2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

200whp 2.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 11:22 PM
  #101  
yellowltcoupe22's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 12-21-07
Posts: 3,741
Likes: 0
From: lucedale, ms
lol toms car wont even start right now.. he's makin bout 0whp at this time cuz somethin went wrong doin the cam install and it wont start back up.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 12:46 AM
  #102  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by yellowltcoupe22
lol toms car wont even start right now.. he's makin bout 0whp at this time cuz somethin went wrong doin the cam install and it wont start back up.
righto...bent valves..but when they are replaced im going to shave the head and start back up with higher compression

Originally Posted by 06ion2coup
Sooooo you got tuned the other day.... you said youd have the dyno... im guessing its def not 200whp like you thought
i wasnt expecting 200 with these mods...but i was saying it is possible based on what i will be showing when this set is done

Last edited by NWAE Cobalt; Mar 20, 2009 at 12:46 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 11:51 PM
  #103  
notrice's Avatar
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-07-07
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: b-wick GA
Originally Posted by _UnLiMiTeD_
are a nuts? a 1999-2004 v6 mustang is a 16 second car. High 15's if its a manual with a good driver. Basic bolton 2.2 cobalt should be able to take it. And a STOCK 2.4 would beat them
Word, i beat my friends v-sux with my car the day i got it. By a long shot too.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 07:53 AM
  #104  
massivematt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-15-06
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Foristell, MO
like i said.. 200hp easily
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 11:24 AM
  #105  
bikeboyben14's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-12-07
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: owensboro ky
matt did you loose a lot of low end torque whne you instaled your cams
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 12:16 PM
  #106  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by massivematt
like i said.. 200hp easily
We know what you said but youve got nothing to back it...
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 01:24 PM
  #107  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Maven
We know what you said but youve got nothing to back it...
didnt you know maven? you dont need proof or logic these days. havent you been paying attention?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2009 | 02:46 PM
  #108  
massivematt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 09-15-06
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Foristell, MO
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by bikeboyben14
matt did you loose a lot of low end torque whne you instaled your cams
Just a little bit. The mid and high torque makes up for the lost low end. As long as you have it tuned perfectly, you shouldnt have much lag in the low end. You can expect some loss in low end torque because of the characteristics of stage 2 cams. If your experiencing sluggish takeoffs, have vince advance your timing a little bit more. Im running 23-24 degrees i believe. Also are you running 91 or 93 octane?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Barkleyj605
2.4L LE5 Performance Tech
4
Oct 24, 2015 12:07 AM
Tupp
Suspension
5
Sep 30, 2015 08:18 PM
Dylan Johnson
Suspension
9
Sep 30, 2015 08:57 AM
InfraRedline
Drag Racing
35
Sep 29, 2015 02:09 PM
GBRunner24
Featured Car Showcase
3
Sep 26, 2015 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 AM.