2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

200whp N/A?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 25, 2010 | 01:35 PM
  #226  
joshc.'s Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 12-05-09
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by all_motor_mike
dude ur sig is awesome, wheres that clip from lmao.

yeah its for the 02-05 j-bodies. it should be a close fit for the cobalts. as soon as i can find a mock up car for them ill be build one as well.


mike
fixed can't forget the original LS Sports. Also they will fit any J-body with an ecotec swap from 95-05.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2010 | 04:28 PM
  #227  
all_motor_mike's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-21-08
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by joshc.
fixed can't forget the original LS Sports. Also they will fit any J-body with an ecotec swap from 95-05.

woops....... i wasnt sure if its was 02 or 03 all remember is when i first saw the cars in the lot over in germany on base, i though it was late 02 but must have been early 02, thanks for the other info though sir.


mike
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 12:33 PM
  #228  
elecblue06's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 03-19-07
Posts: 14,901
Likes: 1
From: newburgh,ny
Originally Posted by all_motor_mike
i like to be conservative and not get ahead of my self u know. elecblue, u hit me up on jbody?


mike
nah i'm not on Jbody.. i just sent an email to you a few weeks back
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #229  
all_motor_mike's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-21-08
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by elecblue06
nah i'm not on Jbody.. i just sent an email to you a few weeks back

did i respond?


mike
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 02:24 AM
  #230  
redcobalt07's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-06-09
Posts: 5,950
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
so how much power do you think an 06 with say GMPP intake and exhaust, lsj header and dp, 2.4 manifold, lsj throttle body, stage 1 comp cams, and upgraded injectors would make with a tune
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 02:30 AM
  #231  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
175.

on a good day...with the right elevation...maybe...MAYYYYBE

but id say youll probly see 160

Last edited by NWAE Cobalt; Nov 27, 2010 at 02:30 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 04:13 AM
  #232  
redcobalt07's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-06-09
Posts: 5,950
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
Originally Posted by NWAE Cobalt
175.

on a good day...with the right elevation...maybe...MAYYYYBE

but id say youll probly see 160
are you serious? i made 168 with stock injectors and a 2.4 TB, you think that with cams, lsj throttle body, and larger injectors you'd only get 7 more hp? obviously a tune is on both cars but still only 175??
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 04:33 AM
  #233  
Mr.N00bLaR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 05-30-07
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
From: WNY
Originally Posted by redcobalt07
are you serious? i made 168 with stock injectors and a 2.4 TB, you think that with cams, lsj throttle body, and larger injectors you'd only get 7 more hp? obviously a tune is on both cars but still only 175??
That's what I would consider ridiculously high.., the dyno thread has some 2.2s as low as 11x,12x with mods. Good for you I 'spose
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 04:43 AM
  #234  
redcobalt07's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-06-09
Posts: 5,950
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
wow thats just ridiculous
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 08:25 AM
  #235  
huckernage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-08
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: quebec city
Originally Posted by redcobalt07
so how much power do you think an 06 with say GMPP intake and exhaust, lsj header and dp, 2.4 manifold, lsj throttle body, stage 1 comp cams, and upgraded injectors would make with a tune
larger injector wont give you any poney.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 02:32 PM
  #236  
redcobalt07's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-06-09
Posts: 5,950
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
well no but they will help with the extra air from having an LSJ throttle body, 175 just seems so low even with cams
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #237  
all_motor_mike's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 08-21-08
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by redcobalt07
well no but they will help with the extra air from having an LSJ throttle body, 175 just seems so low even with cams


no not really, ur not gonna need bigger injectors just because u have a larger throttle body.


mike
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 02:58 PM
  #238  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by redcobalt07
are you serious? i made 168 with stock injectors and a 2.4 TB, you think that with cams, lsj throttle body, and larger injectors you'd only get 7 more hp? obviously a tune is on both cars but still only 175??
your 168 is a happy dyno. i'd say youre at 155whp with what you got. maybe 160
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 03:30 PM
  #239  
Mr.N00bLaR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: 05-30-07
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 0
From: WNY
Originally Posted by redcobalt07
well no but they will help with the extra air from having an LSJ throttle body, 175 just seems so low even with cams
Now that I think about it... theres someone with full bolts on, tune, stg 1 cams that didnt make as much power to the wheels as you did nearly stock. Cant remember the name though, yellow car?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 04:51 PM
  #240  
huckernage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-29-08
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
From: quebec city
Originally Posted by redcobalt07
well no but they will help with the extra air from having an LSJ throttle body, 175 just seems so low even with cams
you ll need larger injector only in boost application

i m cammed stg2 my injector are not maxed out. and i would like use lsj TB and it was not a option to me to run larger injector.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 05:03 PM
  #241  
redcobalt07's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-06-09
Posts: 5,950
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
well i made 168 on a dyno pack

Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 08:50 PM
  #242  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by Mr.N00bLaR
Now that I think about it... theres someone with full bolts on, tune, stg 1 cams that didnt make as much power to the wheels as you did nearly stock. Cant remember the name though, yellow car?
copson


I have full bolts ons and stg2 cams, with a bad afr i made 180whp...but thats also with a shaved cyl head and FULLLLL bolt ons in optimal conditions (the area i live in makes for happy cars )
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 08:51 PM
  #243  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by redcobalt07
well i made 168 on a dyno pack
isnt a dyno pack with the wheels off? ya...doesnt count for **** in comparison to a wheel dyno
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 08:54 PM
  #244  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
what year is your car also?
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2010 | 08:59 PM
  #245  
redcobalt07's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-06-09
Posts: 5,950
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
aw tom thats mean lol, its a 2007
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 01:15 AM
  #246  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by redcobalt07
aw tom thats mean lol, its a 2007
ya..mean but true

Really, any dyno numbers are irrelivant to a car run on a diff dyno. Dynos are really designed to test a car to see if its optimal power and check to see if tuning and parts up the power...using the same dyno you get those results...but due to variables between dynos, locations, hell...even days and time of year it gets to be kinda biased. For instance..the area I dyno in has great air, it is kept nice and cold, dense air and is at relativly at sea level... Also, tire size can have an effect (kind of like a different final drive ratio). SO when you start to think about it, although its a great tool, and we like to compare numbers....comparing them is kind of useless unless everyone dynos on the same dyno same day....



and blah blah blah hahahahaha
That doestn stop me from bragging about my numbers and making people jealous though
and just wait till spring time, when the car has a ported and polished head and a new dyno tune
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 01:21 AM
  #247  
redcobalt07's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-06-09
Posts: 5,950
Likes: 0
From: Harrisburg, PA
yeah but i've long since upgraded so oh well,
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 02:02 PM
  #248  
Matt M's Avatar
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
I didn't read the whole thread, so maybe this has been mentioned already, but one of the problems with a 200whp 2.2 is that it will need to be revved to 10k+ RPMs to achieve this peak power number.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #249  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Matt M
I didn't read the whole thread, so maybe this has been mentioned already, but one of the problems with a 200whp 2.2 is that it will need to be revved to 10k+ RPMs to achieve this peak power number.
not quite that high. but yea, expect to see 8k
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 06:11 PM
  #250  
soundjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 05-26-09
Posts: 13,656
Likes: 47
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by Matt M
I didn't read the whole thread, so maybe this has been mentioned already, but one of the problems with a 200whp 2.2 is that it will need to be revved to 10k+ RPMs to achieve this peak power number.
I call B.S.


but seriously, come on.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 PM.