2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

200whp N/A?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 06:52 PM
  #276  
blucavvy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-05-10
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: illinois
^^^^full mod list please
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 06:56 PM
  #277  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
just power making stuff / related:
k&n filter
ebay CAI
2.4tb
2.4intake mani
lsj injectors
stg 2 comp cam
78lb valve springs
shaved cyl head .020"
ngk laser iridium IX plugs
OTTP longtube 4-1 header (1.75" primaries)
OTTP catless DP (3")
Clear image 3" exhaust w/ magnaflow resonator and "muffler"
lightweight alt pulley
running on amsoil signiture series 0w30 oil
runs on 92 octane shell vpower
7500rpm redline

Road tuned by Vince



To come over winter putting me well in the low-mid 200's will be full port and polish cyl head and a dyno tune by vince

Last edited by NWAE Cobalt; Dec 7, 2010 at 07:29 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 07:01 PM
  #278  
Dart_SI's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-15-09
Posts: 7,170
Likes: 2
From: kansas
Originally Posted by 08ShowbaltLS
dart, what is this mod you are talking about for the f22? my brother has a 08 s2000 cr and would prob be interested
this should be up and running quite well by now since its been in testing since last year. heres a link to the site.

http://designcraftfab.com/latest-new...conversion-kit


We have been testing out a new iVTEC conversion kit for the Honda S2000, based off the CWest / BC Time Attack car, and the results have been successful!

In the mid-range, the car gained 128.8 lb-ft of torque and 98.2 horsepower. We're now wrapping everything up so be on the lookout for a kit in the near future!
price is set for about 2,750 right now. but its not available till march 2010 from what the site says, so thats probably not the final price.

Last edited by Dart_SI; Dec 7, 2010 at 07:08 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 07:07 PM
  #279  
2.2balt's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-21-09
Posts: 355
Likes: 1
From: Ottawa
Over 200whp N/A 2.2? That is pure awesome. You sir, are my hero.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 07:08 PM
  #280  
Dart_SI's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-15-09
Posts: 7,170
Likes: 2
From: kansas
throw some honda cams onto a 2.2 and make it work somehow. youl see over 200whp.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 07:18 PM
  #281  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Dart_SI
throw a K20 head onto a 2.2 and make it work somehow. youl see over 200whp.
fixxed


Originally Posted by NWAE Cobalt
just power making stuff / related:
k&n filter
ebay CAI
2.4tb
2.4intake mani
lsj injectors
shaved cyl head .020"
ngk laser iridium IX plugs
OTTP longtube 4-1 header (1.75" primaries)
OTTP catless DP (3")
Clear image 3" exhaust w/ magnaflow resonator and "muffler"
lightweight alt pulley
running on amsoil signiture series 0w30 oil
runs on 92 octane shell vpower

Road tuned by Vince



To come over winter putting me well in the low-mid 200's will be full port and polish cyl head and a dyno tune by vince
with those mods, i dont think you're over 180whp. I thought you had more done? like cams or something? Im not counting happy dynos. If the baseline when stock was anything outside of 120-130whp, its a happy dyno
Originally Posted by soundjunky
I could see about driving my GA to his neck of the woods... and if he can keep up, I'd believe it.

If he's taken it to the track (and can actually do decent passes) you can estimate it...

I don't know why Zoomer would say this - I mean if he is in any way a vendor wouldn't the ideal position be that of supporting people and giving suggestions on how to pull it off?

Ok, I'll restate what think you would have to do to pull it off, and it can be summed up in three points;

compression + gas + flow

Here's an updated list of what I bleieve would be needed to pull it off;
  • If you don't have a nicely ported L61 head, then swap in an LSJ head (the better flowing the easier this power level will be to make)
  • 10:1 compression ~ but 11:1 would be even better. stock is 10.0:1, so higher is needed. 11.5:1 i'd say, or maybe 13.0:1 if you can get meth
  • I don't have a clue what any ecotec injectors are rated at, but (iirc) if you get ones with something rated around 40lbs, you should have room to spare w/o maxing out the injectors
  • Ported LE5 intake ~ or custom one suited to match, or flow better than the cylinder head
  • A shorty header & high flow exhaust (long tube header would be even better though) long tube is needed IMO
  • Stage III or better cams
  • Custom tune

done.

neutral balance shafts wouldn't hurt either... would free up the engine to spin better...
shaft delete and cams with a 8krpm profile would be needed.
this is all assuming 2.2 displacement
my comments in bold
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 07:29 PM
  #282  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
oh ya, stg 2 cams and 78 lb valves springs should be added to the list...my bad

talked to the dyno owner on the way home, he is going to give me a call the next opening he has and I will get 3 runs in.

Last edited by NWAE Cobalt; Dec 7, 2010 at 07:29 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 07:32 PM
  #283  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
ive always dynoed on the same dyno and this one showed 155 with intake, header back exhaust and a tune (which is about right) showed 145 before the tune
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 07:45 PM
  #284  
blucavvy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-05-10
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: illinois
i don't think you'll break 200.

my bet is you'll need a ported head just to get close to 200, follow that up with an exhaust megaphone after that long tube and you might get where you want to be.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 07:50 PM
  #285  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
we shall see soon enough, but i think you all will be surprised lol

and btw, just because your all being such pesimists....who is paying for my dyno if i hit 200

Last edited by NWAE Cobalt; Dec 7, 2010 at 07:50 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 07:52 PM
  #286  
dandaman15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-10
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: West Allis, WI
I wonder how well a velocity stack would work on these cars. They are proven to add 3-5whp on hondas all day. These cars use MAF sensors though so you need to tune for it but I think you could see some more power with that added on too.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 08:00 PM
  #287  
blucavvy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-05-10
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: illinois
velocity stack on the end of the intake would probly help yes.

you have basic intake and exhaust mods and off the shelf cam's. your'e not going to see 50+ whp with that.

as i said, maybe with more extensive exhaust work, and some head work you might be staring down the 200's. but as it sit's currently, no way.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 08:04 PM
  #288  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by blucavvy
velocity stack on the end of the intake would probly help yes.

you have basic intake and exhaust mods and off the shelf cam's. your'e not going to see 50+ whp with that.

as i said, maybe with more extensive exhaust work, and some head work you might be staring down the 200's. but as it sit's currently, no way.
your funny. basic exhaust stuff? its about as not basic as it gets and without going to ITB setups you cant do much more for the intake side either.
Im also running slightly higher compression due to the shaved head and "off the shelf cam"...umm...it was designed the way it is for a reason...and cams reaaaaaaally arent an "off the shelf" item...if they were alot more people would have them.
Ive already shown around a 50whp improvement over stock, and that was a ways back with a bad AFR. they guy that owns the dyno and a race team commented last time that every point of AFR running rich is equal to approx 10whp....and i was 2+ points rich last time....


you guys are all funny with your "u cant do it"...we know for a fact it will be higher then 180, id say min 190 but more then likely above 200whp
and if you sooooooo sure...put some money on it then smarty
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 08:28 PM
  #289  
Dart_SI's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-15-09
Posts: 7,170
Likes: 2
From: kansas
with all those mods youl make less whp than a civic with an intake

id consider a 200whp 2.2 cobalt a sleeper tho. and fun to drive. what it really needs is better gearing like the newer civic si's have. thats why they are so quick for a n/a 4 banger.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #290  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
but at least i will still have tq
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 08:32 PM
  #291  
Dart_SI's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-15-09
Posts: 7,170
Likes: 2
From: kansas
Originally Posted by NWAE Cobalt
but at least i will still have tq
torque doesnt seem to apply to hondas. lol. theres a guy making 230whp and like 160 or so tq and he traps 106mph in the 1/4 because of his gearing.

no weight reduction. its an 06+ civic si.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 08:34 PM
  #292  
blucavvy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-05-10
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: illinois
meh. i'm not sure y your'e getting butthurt over it all buddy.

oh, btw, cam's are an "off the shelf item" if they're mass produced and not custom made for a specific build. i wish you nothing but the best, i have roughly the same hope's for my car. i just know i'll need more than cams, intake and exhaust mods.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 08:39 PM
  #293  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by blucavvy
meh. i'm not sure y your'e getting butthurt over it all buddy.

oh, btw, cam's are an "off the shelf item" if they're mass produced and not custom made for a specific build. i wish you nothing but the best, i have roughly the same hope's for my car. i just know i'll need more than cams, intake and exhaust mods.
when youve spent the time and money on the car, go out and drive it, hang with the cars you do, and get the comments you do on the car, and then people online treat it like its jut another car that has **** for nothing done...then youll understand
and thank you, i agree its mass produced, but its mass produced because the specs they use for it works...once i do a FULL motor build ill get a custom set, but the cost to very little that i would gain isnt worth it esp since the car isnt 100% done yet.
as for the power, it is either there or within single digits of it...i garuntee it. I hope you the best of luck with your build too.

Originally Posted by Dart_SI
torque doesnt seem to apply to hondas. lol. theres a guy making 230whp and like 160 or so tq and he traps 106mph in the 1/4 because of his gearing.

no weight reduction. its an 06+ civic si.
ya, our gearing kinda sucks...may have to change that someday :P

Last edited by NWAE Cobalt; Dec 7, 2010 at 08:39 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 08:44 PM
  #294  
blucavvy's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 12-05-10
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Originally Posted by NWAE Cobalt
when youve spent the time and money on the car, go out and drive it, hang with the cars you do, and get the comments you do on the car, and then people online treat it like its jut another car that has **** for nothing done...then youll understand
and thank you, i agree its mass produced, but its mass produced because the specs they use for it works...once i do a FULL motor build ill get a custom set, but the cost to very little that i would gain isnt worth it esp since the car isnt 100% done yet.
as for the power, it is either there or within single digits of it...i garuntee it. I hope you the best of luck with your build too.


ya, our gearing kinda sucks...may have to change that someday :P
i have buddy, i have. and as for people on the interwebz saying what they will. who care's? it's your car, if you enjoy it that's all that matters. you think it's easy driving an automatic cavalier sedan that's 7 years old? i was simply stating my opinion that i don't believe you'll hit 200 with your current mod's. that doesn't mean it's not going to happen. simply that i personally will believe it when i see it.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2010 | 09:52 PM
  #295  
HunterKiller89's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-20-06
Posts: 11,183
Likes: 4
From: Los Angeles
with cams now ill say 185-190whp. What are you revving to?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 10:39 AM
  #296  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by HunterKiller89
with cams now ill say 185-190whp. What are you revving to?
7500 is redline
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 11:18 AM
  #297  
soundjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 05-26-09
Posts: 13,656
Likes: 47
From: Calgary, Alberta
wow Tom, not feeling the love here now are you?

I think that hte first part of blue cavy's post is key here;
... as for people on the interwebz saying what they will. who care's? it's your car, if you enjoy it that's all that matters. ...
Also, if people are going to be so doubtful, and it's an expense you'ld like to avoid, I'd say don't bother dynoing, because there will always be doubters.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 12:33 PM
  #298  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by soundjunky
wow Tom, not feeling the love here now are you?

I think that hte first part of blue cavy's post is key here;


Also, if people are going to be so doubtful, and it's an expense you'ld like to avoid, I'd say don't bother dynoing, because there will always be doubters.
no, def no love for the tomtom and cambalt

and ya, I enjoy the car, there is a reason that despite all the nay sayers I keep building it :P
even the dyno op said i was kinda crazy (not that i wouldnt see my numbers...just crazy for doing it haha). he pointed out the downfalls of a high reving HP N/A and the cost. I told him why I was doing it and he shrugged and said :to each his own: lol (he owns a drift team and a full shop lol...he is all about teh turboz)

and ya...the dyno is more of a baseline to see what kind of numbers a full ported and polished head and tune will give me
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 05:05 PM
  #299  
Dart_SI's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 11-15-09
Posts: 7,170
Likes: 2
From: kansas
crank that thing to at LEAST 9000 rmp redline. otherwise your going to fall short. n/a 4 bangers make all their power up top. you just need to make sure you upgrade the valves, springs, and retainers to handle that. if a n/a 1.6L honda can get 200whp, im pretty sure a 2.2 ecotec could.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2010 | 05:22 PM
  #300  
NWAE Cobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-27-07
Posts: 17,332
Likes: 1
From: Puyallup, WA
Originally Posted by Dart_SI
crank that thing to at LEAST 9000 rmp redline. otherwise your going to fall short. n/a 4 bangers make all their power up top. you just need to make sure you upgrade the valves, springs, and retainers to handle that. if a n/a 1.6L honda can get 200whp, im pretty sure a 2.2 ecotec could.
****, by the time im done im lookin for 300 (but thats a fuuuuullllllllll engine build...and really wont be much of street drivable haha).

I plan on building the block to handle 9k rpm, custom cam, all upgraded valve train, lsj head swap, balance shaft removal, stroked, bored, high compression, etc...for right now i just need something to get me by
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:33 PM.