2.2L L61 Performance Tech 16 valve 145 hp EcoTec with 155 lb-ft of torque

need opinions please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 04:26 PM
  #1  
LS_RIDA28's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-19-08
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: lc new mexico
need opinions please

i need opinions not critisim so with that said


which would be better cost wise, maintance wise, and easiest wise? a speed mafia procharger kit or the garrett alpha turbo kit???
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #2  
XM15's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-16-06
Posts: 6,298
Likes: 0
From: CT
IMO turbo> centrifugal supercharger on a 4 cylinder.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #3  
blackjack hotrods's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 03-27-08
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, Arizona
I would stay away from any belt-driven power adders since they use hp to make hp. Go turbo. Not much difference in price that I can see from their respective websites.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #4  
07cobaltss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 11-06-06
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
From: Fort Wayne, Indiana
daily driven?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #5  
LS_RIDA28's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-19-08
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: lc new mexico
yes as a daily driver and weekend cruiser
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 06:32 PM
  #6  
tru2nrtt777's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-08-08
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville/Linden, NC/Myrtle Beach, SC
Turbo.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2008 | 07:29 PM
  #7  
Halfcent's Avatar
I'm old school
 
Joined: 02-16-05
Posts: 6,905
Likes: 3
From: Nashville
No contest. Turbo.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 03:23 AM
  #8  
jperris's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-16-07
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
i'd say turbo is the better way to go. keep in mind, garrett's 'turbo alpha kit' includes an ecm reflash, but it won't work if your car is an '07 (different ecm). so you'll want to buy their 'turbo gt tuner kit' (difference is $500 cheaper, no ecm tune) and then tune with LS2edit, or whatever else is available at that time.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 03:53 AM
  #9  
BigTizzle903's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-07
Posts: 3,186
Likes: 0
From: Middletown, NY
turbo
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 07:02 PM
  #10  
avenger09123's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-07
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Hold on now....everyones jumping to turbo....lets lay out the options
Turbo gives you great controlled driveability. It really doesn't remove horsepower and adds a good amount. However it also means your going to be needing coolant lines to the bearings (means tapping your oil pan more than likely) and your going to need an intercool installed. It also means your going to be getting boost, be it 2psi or 20psi no matter where you go, depending on what you've set your controller at.

Prochargers give you all the air flow based on RPM's of the crank. Your adding mass to the crank (indirectly) and having it spin the fan. It's a great thing if your a higher end guy, means the farther you crank it the more PSI you get out of the procharger. Means your going to have a little bit of boost of for the day to day driving with no need to tap anything, and no belts, no exhast, but also means your going to have to go ***** to the wall if you want serious boost.

Centrifugal superchargers seem to be up in the air, while they take away horsepower, they also give it. Once again, this system is based off RPM's and how fast your belt is spinning. I'd personally go with the roots style blower that comes in the kit from gmdirect...considering the tuning for that is readily available from GM, it'd be a day install and a couple of hours to upload the tune (gm style suggest a telegraph input lol)

I'd go with the turbo if you don't mind the extra quipment that comes with it, and the tapping of your oil pan. Tons of power with a time lag

I'd go procharger if its your daily driver and you only want your power on the higher end of the cars rpm range with zero lag

I'd go supercharger if you want to go tuneable daily driveable power with that initial lose 25hp gain 75hp tradeoff you do
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2008 | 11:30 PM
  #11  
jperris's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-16-07
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Tacoma, WA
Originally Posted by avenger09123
..... your going to be getting boost, be it 2psi or 20psi no matter where you go, depending on what you've set your controller at.
if you stay out of the throttle with a turbo, you don't make boost. max boost is much easier to control with a turbo system. usually with a supercharger system, changing max boost involves changing pulleys. yes, you need to plumb oil and coolant lines for the turbo, but on these motors, it's not really a big deal. we could argue all day about what's better, but really comes down to personal preference. drive some sc cars, drive some turbo cars (cobalts if you can), and decide what you like better, also ask owners of f/i balts what they like and dislike about their own setups. i love turbocharged cars, but don't mind a supercharger. if i had the option, i'd do turbo.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2008 | 02:57 AM
  #12  
LS_RIDA28's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-19-08
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: lc new mexico
this is all good advise but let me ask another question do prochargers make a blow off sound? and how loud is it?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2008 | 07:33 PM
  #13  
Sloco Productions's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 07-30-07
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: Grand Forks,ND
prochargers need power to make power....hence they work well in V8/V6 cars....Turbos just need exhaust...and out of boost turboed motors are effiecient as hell

turbo blowoff and procharger blowoff...are about the same in sound

Last edited by Sloco Productions; Apr 20, 2008 at 07:33 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 01:25 AM
  #14  
LS_RIDA28's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-19-08
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: lc new mexico
ok cool thanks, oh and which is easier to maintain?? i've heard diffrent horror stories from both
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 01:29 AM
  #15  
Coolbalt SS's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: 03-30-07
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: tucson, az
lol chevy tech slapped on a centri blower and it works ****** awesome IMHO.

its easily puttin out over 300whp and with these cars, idk how much more you want in a DD
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 01:47 AM
  #16  
LS_RIDA28's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-19-08
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: lc new mexico
really as in chevy tech who did the 2.0 procharger or another guy??
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2008 | 02:05 AM
  #17  
Smitty1017's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-07-07
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
I dont know ANYONE who put a turbo or supercharger on their 2.2 and "easily" made 300hp. Maybe with an engine rebuild and a stronger tranny...but then you wont be able to stop worth a crap, so there goes another 1200+ for a big brake kit, then youre probly gonna bust you axles... almost everyone here would agree that the highest safe #s for a 2.2 is around 250, I would stay 225 or less to be safe, if it were me.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 04:35 PM
  #18  
LS_RIDA28's Avatar
Thread Starter
New Member
 
Joined: 02-19-08
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: lc new mexico
ok i was looking at speed mafia's prochargers and they have one for the 2.0L cobalt ss and one for a 2.2L ion which one would work?? are they the same??
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 02:55 PM
  #19  
Tracks07's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 05-19-08
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
prochargers quality is lacking and you may want to keep some extra head gaskets and main seals handy. I worked there and all of the pony powered guys not to mention bowtie guys were always having issues with leaks or driveability issues. I would say if you are going to do it...start by building the engine on motor power adders as per the GM ecotec performance recipe book....that way you will have better luck than just bolting on a power adder.....or you can go turbo but keep your boost levels down unless you want to break something......who knows maybe GM and Eaton have a 2.2 roots charger kit in the works......good luck
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tupp
Suspension
5
Sep 30, 2015 08:18 PM
importkiller
Problems/Service/Maintenance
11
Sep 30, 2015 07:18 PM
dasoftest
General Cobalt
82
Sep 29, 2015 02:14 PM
reybalt
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
2
Sep 22, 2015 06:35 PM
Haily229
Suspension
16
Sep 17, 2015 07:18 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.