Is a cobalt SS 2.4 Auto good
ehhhh. It's will be within .10 seconds of one, but I think a good stick driver will beat an auto everytime. they've got five gears to run through and not as much parasitic loss through the drivetrain. But the auto will definitely be more consistent, plus I think the auto transmission can handle more power. That's just a guess based on what I've read, though. I really don't know how much the manuals can handle.
The 5 speed manual is quicker than an auto unless the person does not know how to drive. I have raced my brothers ss auto and have beaten all the time ( stock for stock). Now he has tune intake and exhuast as well as header, and I have stage two exedy clutch intake exuast and hp tune and I beat the **** out of hi auto.
However the auto is extremly good, and this is just my observation.
However the auto is extremly good, and this is just my observation.
The 2.4 auto is nice... but it's not what I would call fast (believe me, I owned one). It will take care of Civics, tCs, Tiburons, etc... but once you start going up against something with real power you realise how slow the auto really is.
A 5-speed is definately a better choice... unless you are gonna add F/I or something... b/c the auto can handle more power.
A 5-speed is definately a better choice... unless you are gonna add F/I or something... b/c the auto can handle more power.
Temperature (even a few degrees)
Humidity
Track Surface (how dirty was it, had it been cleaned recently, etc)
Driver error
Driver initiative
Driver reaction time
fuel quality (yes, the quality of the fuel from pump varies)
atmospheric pressure
air quality (change of the wind coudl mean the difference between clean air and pollution and dust)
vehicle weight
Tire quality
Tire pressure
I'm not saying that you didn't get that result. All I'm saying is that you are passing judgement on the auto transmissions based SOLELY on your result, when others have done better and driven more on par with the manuals. That's all.
Of course the manuals will be faster out of the box, but nowhere NEAR a full second faster.
Humidity
Track Surface (how dirty was it, had it been cleaned recently, etc)
Driver error
Driver initiative
Driver reaction time
fuel quality (yes, the quality of the fuel from pump varies)
atmospheric pressure
air quality (change of the wind coudl mean the difference between clean air and pollution and dust)
vehicle weight
Tire quality
Tire pressure
I'm not saying that you didn't get that result. All I'm saying is that you are passing judgement on the auto transmissions based SOLELY on your result, when others have done better and driven more on par with the manuals. That's all.
Of course the manuals will be faster out of the box, but nowhere NEAR a full second faster.
Of course the weather is not exactly the same but trust me its close.
It's not like one of the days was abnormally hot and one was really cool. We have a pretty short racing season here---and I wish there were tons of cool days--but there just not.
Big changes in atmosphereic pressure, temp and hunidity make a real differece on the time slips---but small differences make very little.
Trust me---I get all the data when I run. Then I go home and do the calculations to figure out the density altitude.
If you want my links ot play around with numbers, I will post the. Enter different data and see HOW it changes the outcome.
I don' get this part of what your saying:
Driver error---sorry but I can't **** an automatic-its only 173hp..there is no monter tire spin...it chirps and thats it.---you just plant it and go. There is no tire spin at this altitude in the automatic. Yes I started it in L and switched to I
Driver initiative--beleive me--I was gripping the steering wheel--urging the car to go faster--it did not. I have no reason to misstate my times or sabotage runs.
Driver reaction time--this has nothing to do with 1/4 mile results. I can sit there for 10 secs and run a 10 sec run. The clock does ont start until the car breaks the beam.
I am not saying a full second faster but 0.5-0.75 or so. Can we agree on that??
Like I said---I conceed that the car might be broken in and capable of a slightly faster times. But having owned the 5 speed car for 1.5 years---it had so much more pull to it. Shifting into third at 60mph the car leaps forward.
Well it all depends on the driver, stock for stock a stick should be faster due to lighter weight, less power loss in the drive train, and better gearing. However autos shift faster and more accurate then a human can. Thats why paddle shifting is making its way, quicker and easier.
And I believe you that you can chirp tires between 2nd and 3rd with the manual. The engine has plenty of power. Hell I chirped between 1st and 2nd with my auto TONIGHT. Granted I've got a shiftplus strapped on there....but it's always a pleasant surprise to chirp tires between gears in an automatic.
does anyone know for sure how much the manual tranny can hold?? has anyone even built one up enough to find out?
also my other random question is when does the next green bar come on for rep?? like 50? 100?
also my other random question is when does the next green bar come on for rep?? like 50? 100?
Last edited by Schultzay; Sep 7, 2007 at 01:24 AM.
Seriously, Monkey and Avro are right, in competent hands the manual is .5-.8 quicker.
A tranny tune will easily shave off .5 sec, however this still gives the 5spd a slight edge.
The real benefit of the auto is ease of driving in traffic, and ease of shifting for disabled people who physically have trouble shifting and/or clutching (like my wife.)
For very high power F/I applications, the auto has the edge. GM rates the auto at 325lbs output torque, which is much more than the 5spd will take.
I bought my balt as a sporty commuter car, not a racer. I have no delusions, that is all it is (without F/I.)
If you decide on the auto get a tune and a tranny cooler. That is all.
yeah if the 2.0 would have came with an auto I would have probably bought it if the extra cost wouldnt have been more than putting the turbo on a 2.4. but im happy with the turbo 2.4. sounds great and runs great with plenty of torque.
^^ive been here alot less time than some of you members and I dont at all know very much but alot of your recent questions can be answered by reading previouse threads about the sc and turbos in other threads, Just answering for someone who probally would say use the search button
^^ive been here alot less time than some of you members and I dont at all know very much but alot of your recent questions can be answered by reading previouse threads about the sc and turbos in other threads, Just answering for someone who probally would say use the search button
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TurboTechRacing
Supporting Vendor Deals & Group Purchases
11
Oct 27, 2015 07:58 AM
Highgross89
08-10 SS Turbocharged General Discussion
20
Sep 11, 2015 03:24 PM



