The Official Dyno Thread
ross you're funny
props for being original and doing something no one had done yet. but damn boy you still have lots more you can get out of that setup. even on the 3.1"
props for being original and doing something no one had done yet. but damn boy you still have lots more you can get out of that setup. even on the 3.1"
Last edited by EXsoccer1921; Jun 8, 2010 at 12:28 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
292 puts you 2nd on the Stock Blower list Tyler. Pretty soon you will be making more power then the old timers did 4 years ago but you will be able to prove it! lol
damnit don't do it.... cause then I have to go e85 and put the smash down again lol (j/p).
Still sitting pretty on the top of the M62 list. I need a challenge again, so I guess go for it, and since I'm back on the stock blower for now I can play too.
Still sitting pretty on the top of the M62 list. I need a challenge again, so I guess go for it, and since I'm back on the stock blower for now I can play too.
Mods:
80# injectors
2.9 pulley
ZZP Midlength Header/Dp combo 1 ž primaries 3 to 2.5 dp gutted cat
Stock catback with a cut out
OTTP HE
Airbox Mod
Stock M62
E85
ebristol spot on tune


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJGvpXMmAOc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iKIEWn7inU
80# injectors
2.9 pulley
ZZP Midlength Header/Dp combo 1 ž primaries 3 to 2.5 dp gutted cat
Stock catback with a cut out
OTTP HE
Airbox Mod
Stock M62
E85
ebristol spot on tune


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJGvpXMmAOc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1iKIEWn7inU
Because your dyno has all kinds of information on it, and I don't want to post it incorrectly.
LSJ and its up to you if you want to give me 292 or 291. The dyno shop gave me 292 for the competition that day but like I said its up to you. They made the mistake of putting 2.4L and they spelled my last name incorrectly.
E85 I consider race gas and can't really count it against a pump gas car..... but I'll join the corn fed fun.
you made 263/215. not something to brag about with a 2.4 TVS. i did 273/250 on .4L less displacement, and the factory, smaller, less efficient blower.
like i said, props for doing something different, and granted you did gain about 100whp and idk how much torque. but it still needs a lot of work.
like i said, props for doing something different, and granted you did gain about 100whp and idk how much torque. but it still needs a lot of work.
you made 263/215. not something to brag about with a 2.4 TVS. i did 273/250 on .4L less displacement, and the factory, smaller, less efficient blower.
like i said, props for doing something different, and granted you did gain about 100whp and idk how much torque. but it still needs a lot of work.
like i said, props for doing something different, and granted you did gain about 100whp and idk how much torque. but it still needs a lot of work.
first of all, stop talking to JBP. they aren't gonna help you any. and i too was on a 3" exhaust, all the way back...
however the tvs will love the ported head, rods, and pistons. do you have a methanol injection setup yet?
however the tvs will love the ported head, rods, and pistons. do you have a methanol injection setup yet?
why are they not gonna help me? no meth my friend who keeps it on hand is moving away and all i have seen is problems with it
Ported cam should add at least the 11 hp..
with meth injection you'll be able to go lower than that 3.1 pulley. you can hit 300/250 with the tvs on your car. but you need to go about it the correct way.
Actually, you'd be 3rd. And I'm still debating on whether or not to put you up there. You're kind of a **** stick. I don't think anyone has forgotten that glorious thread of yours.
He's already used all his chances up.
He's already used all his chances up.
Last edited by ralliartist; Jun 9, 2010 at 02:54 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost



