The Official Dyno Thread
Which TQ curve is flatter?
Run 6 from this Graph? OR

Run 6 from this Graph?

The correction Factor is different but they are the same run. Just different chart scaling.
I already through this with Xavier in the past...
Yeah correction will change the way the graph look. but bOTh your graphs are shakey. mine looks the same just at different angles. heres tenn i think this is a run from earlier that day tenn i think this is what u wanted to see . i used a different correction
i think EB is misinterpreting what i said. i know about correction factors and whatnot. i was just commenting on the flat torque curve, which flat-ness would not change on correction factor. actual numbers displayed might change, but the curve itself would not.
yeah but whats the correction factor?? i would hate to drive your car if that is corrected and smoothed. hahah
seems like the tune could use some work too. constructive critizism mind you. but with a 2.8/60s and 91 i was putting down 273/250
seems like the tune could use some work too. constructive critizism mind you. but with a 2.8/60s and 91 i was putting down 273/250
Last edited by EXsoccer1921; Mar 5, 2010 at 05:22 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

I would say the tune looks pretty good to me.
why didn't he post that one? 
i guess i over looked that he is on the stock header and catback as well. not so bad now
i guess i over looked that he is on the stock header and catback as well. not so bad now
Last edited by EXsoccer1921; Mar 5, 2010 at 05:34 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I know. Its nice to have a good base dyno to see my gains from the exhaust. Dual pass is coming up with opt b. We will see what my temps are after that and maybe a new h/e. Im thinking of swaping turbo soon. Its amazing what e85 does!





