The Official Dyno Thread

Closed Thread Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 7, 2009 | 01:18 AM

#76

EXsoccer1921

Senior Member

Platinum Member

iTrader: (14)

Joined: 05-04-08

Posts: 36,934

Likes: 2

From: The 405

booo. i got knocked outa the top 10

Dec 7, 2009 | 01:34 AM

#77

InfraRedline

Senior Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: 08-22-08

Posts: 7,177

Likes: 6

From: Alpharetta, GA

Maybe not ex! Look at #9s mods...closely

Dec 7, 2009 | 02:11 AM

#78

EXsoccer1921

Senior Member

Platinum Member

iTrader: (14)

Joined: 05-04-08

Posts: 36,934

Likes: 2

From: The 405

Quote:

9. ajm5036 274whp, 242wtq Verifed DynoJet TVS, I, H, DP, E, 60s, HE, T Graph

hahaha. thanks for the heads up. *calls ralli* fix it betch! lol

man i wanna get on a hub dyno. i/h/e/t did 280/270!?!?

i can't wait to drop to a 2.6 and reveal this trick i've had up my sleeve for a while

Dec 7, 2009 | 02:22 AM

#79

ajm5036

Senior Member

Joined: 09-03-08

Posts: 790

Likes: 0

From: Delaware

Quote:

Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921

Uh yeah you guys put me in the wrong section.... When I read the last couple of post I was like wtf?

Dec 7, 2009 | 11:27 AM

#80

ebristol

Senior Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: 04-15-07

Posts: 5,457

Likes: 3

From: WI

Quote:

Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921

I am thinking about re-installing the M62 and going with a 2.6" pulley just to see what I can do. I made 285/265 on a 2.7...

Dec 7, 2009 | 12:34 PM

#81

InfraRedline

Senior Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: 08-22-08

Posts: 7,177

Likes: 6

From: Alpharetta, GA

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebristol

I am thinking about re-installing the M62 and going with a 2.6" pulley just to see what I can do. I made 285/265 on a 2.7...

Now I haz that exact 2.7! Yay!

Dec 7, 2009 | 12:46 PM

#82

ebristol

Senior Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: 04-15-07

Posts: 5,457

Likes: 3

From: WI

Quote:

Originally Posted by InfraRedline

Now I haz that exact 2.7! Yay!

Get that car on the rollers!

Dec 7, 2009 | 01:20 PM

#83

06blackg85ss

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: 04-22-06

Posts: 15,211

Likes: 20

From: New York

nice to see I'm still on top of the stock blower cars after 3 years lol.
too bad I didn't get a high boost dyno on my car 438 was on a hair over 18psi

Dec 7, 2009 | 01:49 PM

#84

ralliartist

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: 10-06-05

Posts: 10,944

Likes: 2

From: Seneca, South Carolina

updated and fixed, sorry for the confusion.

I've had a few compliments on the new layout, how is everyone liking the dyno thread now?

Dec 7, 2009 | 02:26 PM

#85

ebristol

Senior Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: 04-15-07

Posts: 5,457

Likes: 3

From: WI

Quote:

Originally Posted by 06blackg85ss

nice to see I'm still on top of the stock blower cars after 3 years lol.
too bad I didn't get a high boost dyno on my car 438 was on a hair over 18psi

That was not with that H62 you had, was it?

I am going to go after it. Once the E85 summer blend comes back the M62 is going back on with 2.6"!

Dec 7, 2009 | 02:59 PM

#86

EXsoccer1921

Senior Member

Platinum Member

iTrader: (14)

Joined: 05-04-08

Posts: 36,934

Likes: 2

From: The 405

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebristol

I am thinking about re-installing the M62 and going with a 2.6" pulley just to see what I can do. I made 285/265 on a 2.7...

thats also on e-85, wich is about the same motor octane rating as methanol(~105). i'm using 91 octane which has a motor octane rating of ~85/86

Last edited by EXsoccer1921; Dec 7, 2009 at 04:12 PM.

Dec 7, 2009 | 04:04 PM

#87

InfraRedline

Senior Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: 08-22-08

Posts: 7,177

Likes: 6

From: Alpharetta, GA

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebristol

Get that car on the rollers!

I wish there was an accurate dyno here! The one we have i would probably read about 350whp on, which is about 10whp too high! Haha kidding, but B18 swapped hondas put down like 190whp on it...yea

The closest accurate dyno is like 5 hours away

Dec 7, 2009 | 10:45 PM

#88

Area47

Rent me! per hour

Joined: 03-22-07

Posts: 24,161

Likes: 20

From: Still fixing others mistakes.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hiltu

Yes ZZP owns this list and yes they are SAE. Never had a complaint. Just some of you other guys running their numbers up by STD correction factors. So my argument is considered bitching when in layman's terms im trying to compare apples to apples. So unless you have something valid to add, GET BENT

my 360+ whp car still runs.

Dec 8, 2009 | 06:21 AM

#89

06blackg85ss

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: 04-22-06

Posts: 15,211

Likes: 20

From: New York

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebristol

That was not with that H62 you had, was it?

I am going to go after it. Once the E85 summer blend comes back the M62 is going back on with 2.6"!

nah that was the other 06black he had the high helix 62.
mine was on a m62 mildy ported inside, basically just smoothed out.

Dec 8, 2009 | 12:27 PM

#90

chevysssc

Senior Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: 02-12-07

Posts: 2,511

Likes: 0

From: new jersey

subd

Dec 31, 2009 | 03:54 PM

#91

ebristol

Senior Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: 04-15-07

Posts: 5,457

Likes: 3

From: WI

Bumpity

Dec 31, 2009 | 04:04 PM

#92

shadowfaxss

Senior Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: 12-14-06

Posts: 1,646

Likes: 1

From: PA

should have subd to this some time ago......layout is great

Jan 11, 2010 | 03:57 PM

#93

EXsoccer1921

Senior Member

Platinum Member

iTrader: (14)

Joined: 05-04-08

Posts: 36,934

Likes: 2

From: The 405

POSTING THIS FOR UNIJABNX2000 he posted it in the old thread

posting this for shroogis

Quote:

Originally Posted by shroogis

ott stage 2, 19* timing, 93 octane, zzp heat exchanger

this shops dyno reads 10% lower than other mustangs, it's known as the "heartbreaker"

we only took it to 6500, 06black said the power would fall off after that.

Last edited by EXsoccer1921; Jan 11, 2010 at 03:57 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost

Jan 18, 2010 | 06:32 AM

#94

ralliartist

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: 10-06-05

Posts: 10,944

Likes: 2

From: Seneca, South Carolina

just saw this, will update when I get home. I can't see the pics here at work.

Jan 21, 2010 | 06:24 AM

#95

unijabnx2000

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: 12-19-08

Posts: 770

Likes: 0

From: East NC

Thanks man didnt see this thread

Last edited by unijabnx2000; Jan 21, 2010 at 06:24 AM. Reason: cant spell

Jan 21, 2010 | 07:05 AM

#96

ralliartist

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: 10-06-05

Posts: 10,944

Likes: 2

From: Seneca, South Carolina

Quote:

Originally Posted by unijabnx2000

Thanks man didnt see this thread

I've tried to get it stickied. Oh well.

Jan 26, 2010 | 10:30 AM

#97

wantedSS/TC

Senior Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: 02-25-09

Posts: 11,759

Likes: 0

From: Aston, PA

Quote:

Originally Posted by ralliartist

we take the best numbers from all 3 pulls.

hmmmm, them two Dynocom's are the highest power for ss/tc's. coincidence?

more like dynoqueens. see this thread: same car, same day, dynocom, dynojet and mustang dyno:
http://www.my350z.com/forum/vq35hr/4...s-dynojet.html

Again, calibration, load factor, etc. all have variances, but dynacoms seem to be the most liberal in number outputs.

Jan 26, 2010 | 11:49 AM

#98

09BlueBaltSS

Senior Member

Joined: 05-13-09

Posts: 2,951

Likes: 0

From: Davie, Fl

I know that All Jap's dyno reads high. I really dont think im making more than 320whp/360wtq. When the shop up the road has a dyno day again Ill have to run the car again. They got a dynojet I beleive. That will probly be the last time I dyno until I get a new clutch.

Jan 26, 2010 | 12:01 PM

#99

BYT*SS*TURBO

Former Vendor

iTrader: (6)

Joined: 05-01-09

Posts: 5,973

Likes: 0

From: NEPA/North NJ

^We're planning on heading to a Dynocom ourselves to see if all this inflated number hype we read online is true or just online BS. I still have the tune file from our last trip, Ill load that up and run it to be fair