SS/na ..had a run in with a V6 Mustang97-00
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 01-30-07
Posts: 7,835
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia, Pa
SS/na ..had a run in with a V6 Mustang97-00
Im not sure how fast they r but i here that some ss/na can beat it...he was riding my ass i was doing 60 on a 40..till i got to a red light. Light turn green and i went and got to the... outer lane and i floor it ...he was behind me for little bit and i got up to 77mph on a 40mph had to let of because there was a car in fron t of me as he passed me going at 80-90+ mph w/a kid on the Passenger seat.The kid look back at me like they had won or somehting..I f there wasnt aa car in front of me ..i knew i would had beat him ..but i didnt want to go pass 80..b/c i there r alot of cops around my way.
what do you guys think...i should had beat him right??
what do you guys think...i should had beat him right??
New Member
Joined: 01-18-07
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
V6 mustangs aren't that quick. a guy that i work with has an '06 V6 stang with the "pony package" which is cams and a tune, an intake and his muffler removed (sounds like ass). i raced him the other day when we got off work cuz he was always talkin **** about my '07 2.4 SS. we had gone about 3/4 of a mile on the hignway when we quit and he had pulled about two feet of his hood in front of me in that time; not really that impressive for a mustang. my SS is bone stock. he was pretty pissed off and made a lot of excuses the next day before he just admitted that my 2.4 had done pretty damn good.
Senior Member
Joined: 11-30-06
Posts: 3,505
Likes: 0
From: West Memphis, AR
Stock for stock, A 2.4l SS will be faster. I don't care what Ford fanboi gets on here next spouting numbers says about it. A stock SS/NA will be faster than a V6 mustang from that model.
Keep in mind though that you are dealing with an almost decade old car. vs. your brand new one. Some wear and tear has to be factored in.
Also those mustangs have about ten million aftermarket parts for them. They are easy and cheap to mod. Be careful about which ones you pick a fight with.
What I want to see is more 06' ss/na vs 06' Mustang v6 races. Magazine racers give it to the Ford, but I've heard different.
Keep in mind though that you are dealing with an almost decade old car. vs. your brand new one. Some wear and tear has to be factored in.
Also those mustangs have about ten million aftermarket parts for them. They are easy and cheap to mod. Be careful about which ones you pick a fight with.
What I want to see is more 06' ss/na vs 06' Mustang v6 races. Magazine racers give it to the Ford, but I've heard different.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: 01-30-07
Posts: 7,835
Likes: 1
From: Philadelphia, Pa
Stock for stock, A 2.4l SS will be faster. I don't care what Ford fanboi gets on here next spouting numbers says about it. A stock SS/NA will be faster than a V6 mustang from that model.
Keep in mind though that you are dealing with an almost decade old car. vs. your brand new one. Some wear and tear has to be factored in.
Also those mustangs have about ten million aftermarket parts for them. They are easy and cheap to mod. Be careful about which ones you pick a fight with.
What I want to see is more 06' ss/na vs 06' Mustang v6 races. Magazine racers give it to the Ford, but I've heard different.
Keep in mind though that you are dealing with an almost decade old car. vs. your brand new one. Some wear and tear has to be factored in.
Also those mustangs have about ten million aftermarket parts for them. They are easy and cheap to mod. Be careful about which ones you pick a fight with.
What I want to see is more 06' ss/na vs 06' Mustang v6 races. Magazine racers give it to the Ford, but I've heard different.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sl0wbaltSS
2.0L LNF Performance Tech
18
Nov 21, 2018 11:11 PM