why do these read differently
why do these read differently
mpg calculator....
i keep getting different results depending on which site i use... wtf..?
car holds
13 gal - 49 litres
my milage in town
280 miles - 450 kms
my milage on the highway
422 miles - 680 kms
This is what ive gotten/get todate
some calculators say i get:
21.5 mpg city
32.5 mpg highway
and others say:
27 mpg city
39 mpg highway
which one do i believe? i didnt think my milage was that good to 27mpg city, but the info i type in says that.
wtf?
i keep getting different results depending on which site i use... wtf..?
car holds
13 gal - 49 litres
my milage in town
280 miles - 450 kms
my milage on the highway
422 miles - 680 kms
This is what ive gotten/get todate
some calculators say i get:
21.5 mpg city
32.5 mpg highway
and others say:
27 mpg city
39 mpg highway
which one do i believe? i didnt think my milage was that good to 27mpg city, but the info i type in says that.
wtf?
this site reads differently
MPG Calculator Calculate Fuel Consumption / Efficiency in Miles per Gallon
than this one
Miles Per Gallon Calculator, for Canadian Vehicles
i did a whole bunch, and they are back and forth... lol wtf
MPG Calculator Calculate Fuel Consumption / Efficiency in Miles per Gallon
than this one
Miles Per Gallon Calculator, for Canadian Vehicles
i did a whole bunch, and they are back and forth... lol wtf
ill be suprised in this little car if im actually getting 27 mpg town, becuase im pretty rough on it... I have a led foot, always have. I mean i dont let things break and cause problems i love this car. but shes had a pretty rough 30k kms lol
Why not just divide.
280/13=~21.5
422/13=~32.5
Also I doubt you have purposely ran the vehicle to complete empty just for testing purposes.
The only reason I can think is that the second site has their conversion wrong somewhere because I know that simple math is correct.
280/13=~21.5
422/13=~32.5
Also I doubt you have purposely ran the vehicle to complete empty just for testing purposes.
The only reason I can think is that the second site has their conversion wrong somewhere because I know that simple math is correct.
I just wanted to see what that converted into MPG.
AND IM GETTING DIFFERENT ASNWERS FROM DIFFERENT SOURCES. how is this even possible?
Joined: 05-18-11
Posts: 39,564
Likes: 87
From: West Chicago, IL
well lets look at this logically. you are not getting 27mpg city.
like me and the other guy said, simply divide.
provided ALL the miles on one tank were city and all from another tank were highway anyway otherwise your answer will be somewhere inbetween
you are probably getting 21-32 like the bottom result
like me and the other guy said, simply divide.
provided ALL the miles on one tank were city and all from another tank were highway anyway otherwise your answer will be somewhere inbetween
you are probably getting 21-32 like the bottom result
the 680 was the best ive done, thunder bay to winnipeg. never had to stop for fuel.
And 95% of that 450 kms will be city only.
and my numbers are normal for these cars? the 21/32
2.2 l61 NA
And 95% of that 450 kms will be city only.
and my numbers are normal for these cars? the 21/32
2.2 l61 NA
The site giving you higher MPG values is using Imperial Gallons, while the other is using US Gallons.
One US Gallon equals about 0.8 Imperial Gallons.
If you take your 27 city MPG and multiply it by 0.8, you get 21.6 city MPG.
If you take your 39 highway MPG and multiply it by 0.8, you get 31.2 MPG.
One US Gallon equals about 0.8 Imperial Gallons.
If you take your 27 city MPG and multiply it by 0.8, you get 21.6 city MPG.
If you take your 39 highway MPG and multiply it by 0.8, you get 31.2 MPG.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




