North East PA, NY, NJ, DE, MD, CT, RI, MA, NH, VT, and ME

Pittsburgh Crew < You

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 12:01 AM
  #14276  
averagewhiteboy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-23-05
Posts: 8,761
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Kwol, your name is very similar to Kowalski.. lol. If it was, you'd have a white Challenger though.. lol

Nice numbers regardless of your last name..
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 01:31 AM
  #14277  
ssaddiction's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-22-06
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: Elizabeth/Mckeesport, PA
hey guys justwanted to say hi havent been on here for a while and i moved to orlando im going to UTI so hows thinks goin back in the berg i cant wait to get back there i hate it here man to much city for me im a country boy haha
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 07:31 AM
  #14278  
SK360's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-18-07
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 0
From: Center Township (Pittsburgh), PA
ASA Performance has a mustang dyno...

and +1 on not letting Ed touch my pedal bike.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:08 AM
  #14279  
Dead Zen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-19-06
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 1
From: Beaver, PA (outside Pittsburgh)
Originally Posted by csementuh
LAWL...

OK I have the dumbest question alive... I am gonna buy a mechanical boost gauge, an Autometer ES gauge to match my Interceptor and DB Wideband gauge...

Should I get a 20psi or 30psi gauge... I'm probably sitting at about 17.5-18psi with what I have now, but I was thinking for the future, I don't want to be maxing out the 20psi gauge... And I may get ballsy and drop to a 2.6" or soo at some point...

Would the 30psi gauge be any less accurate or anything? Any other cons such as not being able to read as easily as it is more cramped?
just get a 30


Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:46 AM
  #14280  
averagewhiteboy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-23-05
Posts: 8,761
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
^ That looks great glowing blue around the gauge..
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 08:49 AM
  #14281  
kwol18's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-05-08
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by averagewhiteboy
Kwol, your name is very similar to Kowalski.. lol. If it was, you'd have a white Challenger though.. lol

Nice numbers regardless of your last name..
Close guess. Last name is actually Kowalsky with the y not i. In Ambrige there are both spellings. And I don't have a Challenger, that I know of??
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 10:43 AM
  #14282  
Dead Zen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-19-06
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 1
From: Beaver, PA (outside Pittsburgh)
Originally Posted by averagewhiteboy
^ That looks great glowing blue around the gauge..
tis the reflection on the chrome bezel
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 12:49 PM
  #14283  
averagewhiteboy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 10-23-05
Posts: 8,761
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by kwol18
Close guess. Last name is actually Kowalsky with the y not i. In Ambrige there are both spellings. And I don't have a Challenger, that I know of??
No, no, no.. I mean for Vanishing Point.. Old car movie..? haha

Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #14284  
kwol18's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-05-08
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by averagewhiteboy
No, no, no.. I mean for Vanishing Point.. Old car movie..? haha


Never saw it. my bad
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #14285  
csementuh's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: 12-20-07
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 0
From: Jeannette, PA
Al, can you please explain the way to do the breather properly~! I tried to PM but it said you did not accept them...

https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/2-0l-lsj-performance-tech-47/valve-cover-breather-pcv-hose-removal-141840/
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #14286  
alleycat58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
x3 on ASAP, wouldn't recommend them at all.

The only thing I can see that might throw things off on the dyno is the weight of the car is WAY off. They put in 3200lbs for the weight of the car when it's likely closer to 2800. That will affect your numbers. Did he input the gear ratios and are you sure he put the right ones in?

All dyno numbers are subject to variation, but if you want a closer-to-accurate number, find another shop with a dynojet.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:04 AM
  #14287  
kwol18's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-05-08
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by alleycat58
x3 on ASAP, wouldn't recommend them at all.

The only thing I can see that might throw things off on the dyno is the weight of the car is WAY off. They put in 3200lbs for the weight of the car when it's likely closer to 2800. That will affect your numbers. Did he input the gear ratios and are you sure he put the right ones in?

All dyno numbers are subject to variation, but if you want a closer-to-accurate number, find another shop with a dynojet.


I can see the weight being off. and changing the numbers some. I wouldn't think it would change it 20hp or more, but again. I'm new to this. As far as gear ratio's. I'm not sure what he changed. Other then synch the dyno and car at 4K rmps in 4th, i dont' know. Each reading was in 4th. I"ll look at hitting a dynojet sometime in Dec for another session.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:13 AM
  #14288  
alleycat58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by kwol18
I can see the weight being off. and changing the numbers some. I wouldn't think it would change it 20hp or more, but again. I'm new to this. As far as gear ratio's. I'm not sure what he changed. Other then synch the dyno and car at 4K rmps in 4th, i dont' know. Each reading was in 4th. I"ll look at hitting a dynojet sometime in Dec for another session.
Every once in a great while there's a group that will get a dyno day together, but it's usually pretty far away from Ambridge. Although the Moon/Robinson crew goes, so it's not too bad. I've gotta start getting used to those drives too, I'm not in "middle of everything" territory anymore as of next month.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:27 AM
  #14289  
kwol18's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-05-08
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: PA
Here's a question. What gear would be the closest to 1:1 on the 2.2's. Obviously i dyno'd in 4th. If 4th is isn't close to 1:1 how would that affect the readings? up or down. Just curious. Also what gear would be the best to run in
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #14290  
SK360's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-18-07
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 0
From: Center Township (Pittsburgh), PA
Weight would have no effect on the dyno. except keeping the wheels planted on the rollers.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #14291  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by kwol18
Here's a question. What gear would be the closest to 1:1 on the 2.2's. Obviously i dyno'd in 4th. If 4th is isn't close to 1:1 how would that affect the readings? up or down. Just curious. Also what gear would be the best to run in
The gear won't affect the readings at all on a manual. Thats only an issue on an automatic trans.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #14292  
SK360's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-18-07
Posts: 2,898
Likes: 0
From: Center Township (Pittsburgh), PA
Wow is that Al I see posting in the pgh thread? lol.

Wow must be down...
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:35 AM
  #14293  
alleycat58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by SK360
Weight would have no effect on the dyno. except keeping the wheels planted on the rollers.
It does on a Mustang dyno though IIRC and that's what he dyno'd on.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #14294  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by alleycat58
It does on a Mustang dyno though IIRC and that's what he dyno'd on.
Only for tuning. Its plugged in there to load the dyno up slower and steeper for a heavier vehicle. The output numbers still stay the same though.

The only numbers you can play with are correction factors.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:40 AM
  #14295  
alleycat58's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-08-05
Posts: 18,529
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by Witt
Only for tuning. Its plugged in there to load the dyno up slower and steeper for a heavier vehicle. The output numbers still stay the same though.

The only numbers you can play with are correction factors.
Ahhhhh. I just remember the State College crew making a big deal with a shop that used to be up there majorly fudging up some numbers and getting a dissertation on how to manipulate a Mustang Dyno. Weight was in there somewhere. I just remember from what Steve said about it that Mustangs are about the easiest dyno out there to get false numbers out of.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:48 AM
  #14296  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by alleycat58
Ahhhhh. I just remember the State College crew making a big deal with a shop that used to be up there majorly fudging up some numbers and getting a dissertation on how to manipulate a Mustang Dyno. Weight was in there somewhere. I just remember from what Steve said about it that Mustangs are about the easiest dyno out there to get false numbers out of.
Mustangs will allow raw correction factors to be placed in there to take the raw power number and multiply it by a percentage. Dynojets only allow the standard correction factors such as STD, SAE, DIN, EEC and so on.

The vehicle weight is used to simulate the cars own weight in order to load it to simulate real world conditions to achieve an accurate tune. Even if the weight is changed, the force of 300whp in a 2000lb car will spin the rollers just as fast as 300whp in a 5000lb car.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:49 AM
  #14297  
PpAzZ1101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-21-06
Posts: 3,454
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Witt
The vehicle weight is used to simulate the cars own weight in order to load it to simulate real world conditions to achieve an accurate tune. Even if the weight is changed, the force of 300whp in a 2000lb car will spin the rollers just as fast as 300whp in a 5000lb car.
QFT. Learn physics people.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:51 AM
  #14298  
kwol18's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 02-05-08
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by Witt
Mustangs will allow raw correction factors to be placed in there to take the raw power number and multiply it by a percentage. Dynojets only allow the standard correction factors such as STD, SAE, DIN, EEC and so on.

The vehicle weight is used to simulate the cars own weight in order to load it to simulate real world conditions to achieve an accurate tune. Even if the weight is changed, the force of 300whp in a 2000lb car will spin the rollers just as fast as 300whp in a 5000lb car.


This make me feel much better about my numbers. So it seems if anything gave me more #'s then i'm actually pulling it's the correction factors.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #14299  
Tazmanian_Dvl's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 04-15-07
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
From: Butler, PA
Originally Posted by alleycat58
Every once in a great while there's a group that will get a dyno day together, but it's usually pretty far away from Ambridge. Although the Moon/Robinson crew goes, so it's not too bad. I've gotta start getting used to those drives too, I'm not in "middle of everything" territory anymore as of next month.
Where ya movin to?
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2008 | 10:57 AM
  #14300  
Witt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-03-06
Posts: 4,958
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by kwol18
This make me feel much better about my numbers. So it seems if anything gave me more #'s then i'm actually pulling it's the correction factors.
Something is way off on that dyno though, its probably something mechanical. There was a 2.4L turbo there that was just a touch higher than that and runs mid 13s.

Correction factors bump the numbers around to achieve a "what if" situation on an average day. Each factor uses its own conditions but they are all near 0 DA/low humidity and ~65 degrees temperature conditions. The further the weather and altitude deviates from those conditions the more of a correction will be applied.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 AM.