Turbo 2.4 up and running but not great...video inside
I'm learning about them just as much as anyone, I just benefit from the fact that I have redline dan (djt81185) and a few others (WSFrazier, PpAzZ1101, etc) as drinking buddies as they are tuning geniouses. 
Edit: My opinion on putting the MAF after the turbo (blow through) may be one way to get around having to upgrade to a larger MAF, but will detract from the sensor's precision. all imo tho.
Edit: My opinion on putting the MAF after the turbo (blow through) may be one way to get around having to upgrade to a larger MAF, but will detract from the sensor's precision. all imo tho.
I did surprise myself though... I had a few ideas yesterday while watching the charts on the dyno. My ideas were all mentioned in the information I found while searching online today. Just too bad that none of them applied in this case.
I really think we just need to get a wideband on this car and take it out ourselves. I'm pretty confident we'd be able to iron this out on our own.
Also, I agree on the MAF sensor placement. Pull-through should allow for more accurate readings on this setup. Too much turbulence in the charge piping... especially with these smaller pipes with a lot of bends. I think the longest straight piece in the entire setup is where the MAF sensor is now.... and the recirc entry is pretty far up the pipe from the sensor. It's pretty much ideal placement IMO.
I agree with this X100. The car is going to need more than just a dyno tune to smooth PE. Since its a daily driver in a county where OBD2 emissions are a must, every sensor should be decently recalibrated.
Last edited by GTP; Apr 5, 2007 at 05:17 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Just call me. Only one who calls me is Dano X2. Don;t blame you guys though who wants to hangout with a DAD.
I'm learning about them just as much as anyone, I just benefit from the fact that I have redline dan (djt81185) and a few others (WSFrazier, PpAzZ1101, etc) as drinking buddies as they are tuning geniouses. 
Edit: My opinion on putting the MAF after the turbo (blow through) may be one way to get around having to upgrade to a larger MAF, but will detract from the sensor's precision. all imo tho.
Edit: My opinion on putting the MAF after the turbo (blow through) may be one way to get around having to upgrade to a larger MAF, but will detract from the sensor's precision. all imo tho.
The Alpine set-up that will be going on my 2.4 Auto next week will use the SMT-6 for tuning. Obviously I'll report back on tuning issues with it. What we come up with there can be directly applied to your situation, just programming a different processor.
Agree on the MAF, which was why I was asking.
The Alpine set-up that will be going on my 2.4 Auto next week will use the SMT-6 for tuning. Obviously I'll report back on tuning issues with it. What we come up with there can be directly applied to your situation, just programming a different processor.
The Alpine set-up that will be going on my 2.4 Auto next week will use the SMT-6 for tuning. Obviously I'll report back on tuning issues with it. What we come up with there can be directly applied to your situation, just programming a different processor.
I'd also worry about sealing a MAF in the pressure tube - while it is relatively easy to seal it to the tube, the MAF itself isn't designed to hold pressure and I'd wonder where it would spring a leak (I can just see it blow the connector off like a champagne cork!). Also, does the MAF also act as the inlet temp sensor (ambient air temp sensor)? If so, then ambient temp going into the engine would actually be more accurate with the MAF in the boost tube. But it might not be worth the other hassles just to get this precision.
im a dad but then again that makes me not be able to hang as much lol
Last edited by celicacobalt; Apr 5, 2007 at 06:17 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
that sounds awesome but im at work till 10pm tonight i actually wont have a day off till wed of next week, but if garrett,pcmforless,asaperformance and you guys figure out the issue before then , that would be a call off day i guess.
im a dad but then again that makes me not be able to hang as much lol
im a dad but then again that makes me not be able to hang as much lol
Aw come on... you know I meant you too. I just mentioned Dan and Al cause that's all that Al mentioned in his post. You teach me a lot about the hardware and the setup as well as the tuning.
Its ok...I was just yankin yer chain. i am MIA most of the time I know. I've had a tough year, I hope everyone excuses me. (BIG CYBER HUG)
Dan runs back and looks at his blow thru maf and whispers:
"its ok baby he didnt mean it...you'll work just as intended evil laugh"
Haha... it's ok. Your turbo has to actually spool in order to produce any pressure in your charge pipe.
The 2.2/2.4L Cobalts use slightly different plugs, and last time I was looking there were no heat variations available. That's probably why the shop said that.
Last edited by zomghax; Apr 6, 2007 at 11:18 AM.


