Just lowered the car on CM's springs
Fe3. Tires are 245/45/17. Only rubbed when I turned. So I guess the front.
Stock struts and shocks. 91k miles
Stock struts and shocks. 91k miles
Last edited by chevygirl2006; Oct 29, 2012 at 02:05 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I know bump stops have nothing to do with ride height, I just see a lot of "too cut or not" thread so I preemptively posted what I did on my install.
Also, on the stock 18's, I do get some fender liner rub under heard turns, no big deal though. The tire will take what it wants and the rest can stay lol.
Also, on the stock 18's, I do get some fender liner rub under heard turns, no big deal though. The tire will take what it wants and the rest can stay lol.
yeah that's what I'm saying! I think the front end is perfect, but I'm not really crazy about the rake it has.
Oh and even with 245/35's I've never had any issues with rubbing
Oh and even with 245/35's I've never had any issues with rubbing
Mine look relatively similar, maybe a touch lower. I think we all wish they were a bit lower but honestly, any spring that is lower will upset handling and ride quality. At least we maintain stock on both accounts while getting some drop. The bind on some springs like sportlines is hilarious, there is hardly any suspension travel at all.
Last edited by nobody2u; Oct 29, 2012 at 06:06 PM.
NOT cutting them could decrease ride quality. Some spring manufacturers recommend you cut them (H&R for example on some cars)... All cutting does is prevent bottoming out so soon since your total travel is decreased.
I experienced similar "stock feel" on my RX-8 after lowering it on H&Rs, but apparently according to people on this site they're crappy springs. I thought they were great, but then again, I'm not Wangspeed or one of these guys that track their cars and push them to their very limits, so they might have worked better for me because of that.
Putting the rear springs upside down won't make the car sit higher. Mine were originally put in upside down. I flipped then and it's the exact same ride height. It just rides better now
I was always told to not cut bump stops from multiple people on here
I was always told to not cut bump stops from multiple people on here
Last edited by chevygirl2006; Oct 29, 2012 at 09:28 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Sounds contradicting, man... If it's ANY spring, CM is included, right?
Then how is it maintained stock?
I experienced similar "stock feel" on my RX-8 after lowering it on H&Rs, but apparently according to people on this site they're crappy springs. I thought they were great, but then again, I'm not Wangspeed or one of these guys that track their cars and push them to their very limits, so they might have worked better for me because of that.
I experienced similar "stock feel" on my RX-8 after lowering it on H&Rs, but apparently according to people on this site they're crappy springs. I thought they were great, but then again, I'm not Wangspeed or one of these guys that track their cars and push them to their very limits, so they might have worked better for me because of that.
Pedders vs CM are the following: Pedders perform better and ride better. CM are cheaper, lower and behave close to stock.
It isn't contradicting because they aren't that low. If you want to nit pick I could have said MOST. Many lowering springs have terrible rates in order to cope with going so low, they also bind like crazy. CM springs keep similar stock spring rates and don't have that crazy bind. So you are able to find ones out there that are lower, but that low comes at a price.
Pedders vs CM are the following: Pedders perform better and ride better. CM are cheaper, lower and behave close to stock.
Pedders vs CM are the following: Pedders perform better and ride better. CM are cheaper, lower and behave close to stock.
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: 04-06-10
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 0
From: 6000ft on a Mountain in Colorado!
It isn't contradicting because they aren't that low. If you want to nit pick I could have said MOST. Many lowering springs have terrible rates in order to cope with going so low, they also bind like crazy. CM springs keep similar stock spring rates and don't have that crazy bind. So you are able to find ones out there that are lower, but that low comes at a price.
Pedders vs CM are the following: Pedders perform better and ride better. CM are cheaper, lower and behave close to stock.
Pedders vs CM are the following: Pedders perform better and ride better. CM are cheaper, lower and behave close to stock.
Eibachs were rough and I hated it! When they were working on the highway in my city, they had what looked like a 2" incline of new pavement and hitting it at 60 MPH felt like I needed to get new shocks and check every aspect of my car. I'm sure it sounded worse than it actually was, but I hated it.
CM Springs had better ride than Eibach for sure, but I had forgot what stock feels like so I couldn't reference it now or then.
The only reason why I left CM springs was because I heard how nice the ride was with Pedders and said WTF I'll give it a go. Sure enough, it was night and day compared to CM Springs. I can't imagine what it'd feel like if I went Eibachs to Pedders.
I love my pedders, they're not nearly as low as CM springs, but the ride makes up for that for me. The back end almost looks stock, but the front is lower. If you look at my sig it'll show my pedders and here's a video of my CM Springs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKbqlElybx4
Once I replace the strut I think it will be alright. Manufacturers claim that the suspension needs to be replaced every 75-100K. My car has almost 95,000Km on it. I've read of people using a 245 tire and getting away with it. I don't see why mine is giving me a problem. Mine only does it when I have people sitting in the back seat.


