16psi + C16 + 150shot + 22* timing = Z06 Killer :-)
10-29-2008, 06:12 PM
#780
Rent me! per hour
Join Date: 03-22-07
Location: Still fixing others mistakes.
Posts: 24,185
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes
on
14 Posts
so, let me get this right. street dddrreeeaaammmmzzzzzzzzz is calling out cars thats are clearly going to push his **** in with his "fast" sky at a whopping 103 trap speed, which btw is weak. now you can't even back this supposed badass irl that you took apart for no reason? admit defeat sunshine.
just sayin.
just sayin.
10-29-2008, 07:08 PM
#782
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-23-06
Location: Mo-town, WV
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And to go back a few pages, here's your proof that the car still exists since you were skeptical:
so, let me get this right. street dddrreeeaaammmmzzzzzzzzz is calling out cars thats are clearly going to push his **** in with his "fast" sky at a whopping 103 trap speed, which btw is weak. now you can't even back this supposed badass irl that you took apart for no reason? admit defeat sunshine.
just sayin.
just sayin.
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/advanced-performance-modifications-130/turbo-progress-finally-underway-gutted-engine-bay-pics-inside-125990/
But after putting all the math together and realing a 500hp FWD car is like being the smrtest retard, I went and bought a Sky Redline to beef up instead. Now the IRL was going back to complete stock for summer time DD duty, but threads like these are going to make me throw the mods (lowering springs included lol) back on to hush all the nay-sayers.
And I'm not sure where you got a 103mph trap speed as weak. That's good for high 12s with a 1.8 60' time on a warmer day. For example: Good old 06lackg86ss up there does a paltry 12.84 @ 114 in the 1/4. I could do that same 12.84 @ 103. So we tie each other at the end of the track. Doesn't look like his car is any quicker than mine at that point.
Last edited by StreetDreamz; 10-29-2008 at 07:10 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
10-29-2008, 07:14 PM
#783
Senior Member
Yup. Still waiting to hear your mods. Can't be that fast if you had to buy an automatic.
And to go back a few pages, here's your proof that the car still exists since you were skeptical:
I took the IRL apart to make a massive turbo build, if you remember this thread:
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=125990
But after putting all the math together and realing a 500hp FWD car is like being the smrtest retard, I went and bought a Sky Redline to beef up instead. Now the IRL was going back to complete stock for summer time DD duty, but threads like these are going to make me throw the mods (lowering springs included lol) back on to hush all the nay-sayers.
And I'm not sure where you got a 103mph trap speed as weak. That's good for high 12s with a 1.8 60' time on a warmer day. For example: Good old 06lackg86ss up there does a paltry 12.84 @ 114 in the 1/4. I could do that same 12.84 @ 103. So we tie each other at the end of the track. Doesn't look like his car is any quicker than mine at that point.
And to go back a few pages, here's your proof that the car still exists since you were skeptical:
I took the IRL apart to make a massive turbo build, if you remember this thread:
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/showthread.php?t=125990
But after putting all the math together and realing a 500hp FWD car is like being the smrtest retard, I went and bought a Sky Redline to beef up instead. Now the IRL was going back to complete stock for summer time DD duty, but threads like these are going to make me throw the mods (lowering springs included lol) back on to hush all the nay-sayers.
And I'm not sure where you got a 103mph trap speed as weak. That's good for high 12s with a 1.8 60' time on a warmer day. For example: Good old 06lackg86ss up there does a paltry 12.84 @ 114 in the 1/4. I could do that same 12.84 @ 103. So we tie each other at the end of the track. Doesn't look like his car is any quicker than mine at that point.
10-29-2008, 07:28 PM
#784
Senior Member
Join Date: 11-21-06
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 06blackg85ss View Post
you do realize you guys need a lot of power to keep up with these LS2 cars, bolt on, little spray, ain't gonna do much.
I raced mezzano's LS6 Z06 , heads, cam, headers, intake, no cats, tune. 454whp and we were dead even from a roll to 145mph or so. and that was on my 430whp setup.
you do realize you guys need a lot of power to keep up with these LS2 cars, bolt on, little spray, ain't gonna do much.
I raced mezzano's LS6 Z06 , heads, cam, headers, intake, no cats, tune. 454whp and we were dead even from a roll to 145mph or so. and that was on my 430whp setup.
10-29-2008, 07:29 PM
#785
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-12-06
Location: HepCat City
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am sure you really know how weak your car is, I'll give you credit and say you can't truely be that dumb, but you have this forum to hide behind with bogus claims.
10-29-2008, 08:25 PM
#786
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-30-06
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HAHA I have an auto and I'll race ya. Tell you what I'll even give you a couple of cars from a roll or a dig.
How the hell do you figure a 103 will get you in the 12s with a 1.8 60'? Back when I first put the blower on I went 12.87 @ 109 with a 2.0 60'. I hate to break it to you its going to take more than a 1.8 to run 12s with a 103 trap.
Also do you have any timeslips or track videos of the car? All I have seen is one lame ass video of you "racing" a 4XXhp Z06.
PS: A 103 trap is weak as ****.
But after putting all the math together and realing a 500hp FWD car is like being the smrtest retard, I went and bought a Sky Redline to beef up instead. Now the IRL was going back to complete stock for summer time DD duty, but threads like these are going to make me throw the mods (lowering springs included lol) back on to hush all the nay-sayers.
And I'm not sure where you got a 103mph trap speed as weak. That's good for high 12s with a 1.8 60' time on a warmer day. For example: Good old 06lackg86ss up there does a paltry 12.84 @ 114 in the 1/4. I could do that same 12.84 @ 103. So we tie each other at the end of the track. Doesn't look like his car is any quicker than mine at that point.
And I'm not sure where you got a 103mph trap speed as weak. That's good for high 12s with a 1.8 60' time on a warmer day. For example: Good old 06lackg86ss up there does a paltry 12.84 @ 114 in the 1/4. I could do that same 12.84 @ 103. So we tie each other at the end of the track. Doesn't look like his car is any quicker than mine at that point.
Also do you have any timeslips or track videos of the car? All I have seen is one lame ass video of you "racing" a 4XXhp Z06.
PS: A 103 trap is weak as ****.
10-29-2008, 09:02 PM
#788
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-17-07
Location: right behind you.
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-29-2008, 09:20 PM
#792
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-23-06
Location: Mo-town, WV
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Didnt area try to tell you , your going to hit a brick wall with your turbo plans at about 450whp and you told him STFU you own a well known shop and you are going to build a 600 whp saturn with no engine work. and whats up with them old ass pics , if you own the car just go outside with a piece of paper with todays date and snap a pic.
10-29-2008, 09:35 PM
#794
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-23-06
Location: Mo-town, WV
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HAHA I have an auto and I'll race ya. Tell you what I'll even give you a couple of cars from a roll or a dig.
How the hell do you figure a 103 will get you in the 12s with a 1.8 60'? Back when I first put the blower on I went 12.87 @ 109 with a 2.0 60'. I hate to break it to you its going to take more than a 1.8 to run 12s with a 103 trap.
Also do you have any timeslips or track videos of the car? All I have seen is one lame ass video of you "racing" a 4XXhp Z06.
PS: A 103 trap is weak as ****.
How the hell do you figure a 103 will get you in the 12s with a 1.8 60'? Back when I first put the blower on I went 12.87 @ 109 with a 2.0 60'. I hate to break it to you its going to take more than a 1.8 to run 12s with a 103 trap.
Also do you have any timeslips or track videos of the car? All I have seen is one lame ass video of you "racing" a 4XXhp Z06.
PS: A 103 trap is weak as ****.
Also, straight off the Solstice GXP forum:
Originally Posted by LHowie
With a few mods I went a 12.38 at 109 mph last week at the track with a K&N air filter, 3" exhaust, CAT delete, manual boost controler, HP Tuner, plus water & alcohol injection, 94 Sunoco gas.
No. Thank god. I hated that about living in NY.
What's your 60' time? If you're pulling a 2.2 60' and only trapping 103 then there is no hope for even coming close to 12s for you. I bet you knock out the 1/4 in what 13.9, 14.0?
Last edited by StreetDreamz; 10-29-2008 at 09:49 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
10-29-2008, 10:32 PM
#795
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-18-07
Location: Center Township (Pittsburgh), PA
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10-29-2008, 10:54 PM
#796
Banned
Join Date: 04-23-08
Location: Jonestown
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This has to be the dumbest ******* post I have ever read by someone claiming to be a car guru.
What in the **** does that mean exactly? So because someone bought an Automatic means the car can't be that fast? WTF does that mean? Automatic cars are not fast?? Are you that ******* stupid?
Have you ever thought he bought a stock car with an Auto and put mods into it and made it faster yet kept an auto? Is it that hard to understand?
Dumbest post I have ever read in my 3 years of being associated with this site goes to StreetDreamz.
Thanks for the sig material.
10-29-2008, 10:54 PM
#797
Senior Member
Join Date: 07-30-06
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All of you need to go back and learn how to get going from a dig then and the fundamentals of drag racing. If you know ANYTHING about drag racing then you know that 1/10th in your 60' is usually worth about 1.5-2/10ths in the 1/4 mile. And yellowGT you have just proven the point yourself. You had a horrible 60' time of 2.0 and did a 12.87 @ 109. Get your 60' down to like a 1.8 and watch your car do a 12.5 @ 109 instead. High trap speeds mean you suck at launching. I have ran 14.2s before at 108mph. But that's with a 2.4 60' time. Maybe this will help you see better: A bolt on AWD EVO with a good clutch and sticky tires can do a 12.2 @ 110 in the 1/4 with a 1.5 60', when the best you can manage out of your Mustang is a 12.87 @ 109. It's only a 1mph difference, but it's nearly 7/10ths. Because the EVO has a great launch. Your s/c'ed Mustang and that bolt on EVO probably make about the same power. The difference is the EVO got going better, plain and simple.
A 103 car will NOT net an ET in the 12s. You can improve 60' times but not that much.
A 2.0 60' is not horrible its not great but its not that bad especially on a auto car.
A 1.5 60' in a Lancer aint that easy to get it takes more than bolt ons and they still trap higher than 110.
Also those were old times and I run 10.85@128.19 with a 1.69 60'.
Please don't try to school me on racing when you have no ******* clue what you are talking about. A 103 trap speed is NOT a 12 sec car plain and simple.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post