2.2 ls vs 01 prelude both autos.
Senior Member
Joined: 09-05-07
Posts: 10,662
Likes: 0
From: Sasebo Japan
no my next comment would be i could give 2 ***** i own neither car....and so close to 10k post
5 more post
damn post ******. anyway i've killed accords, civics, a cavy, neon, grand ams, v6 grand prix, scion tc and a sentra ser spec-v a coupla times and all races were motor for motor. the 2.2 is a respectable engine however because it comes as a base package there will always be haters.
i see cars every damn day that willl own every car on this forum.
i find the lambo victory hard to swallow. i just don't see even with a mediocre driver at the wheel.
i see cars every damn day that willl own every car on this forum.
i find the lambo victory hard to swallow. i just don't see even with a mediocre driver at the wheel.
Senior Member
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
From: .
I'm into the 13's and my car isn't fast or able to pull times to brag about.
A stock RSX-S isn't going to beat SS/SC stock for stock.
Who cares about the money issue if you spent thousands more on a LS than an old hatch..who cares.A cars a car and you could have went with that or similar instead.
Yes, both cars are slow stock (The SI hatch and the LS) but he did infact get rid of his weak point..the engine.I guess the good think about Cobalts is that you can just get an engine full of potential by just ordering an SS.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 08-23-08
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
From: strawberry plains, tn
You can't claim 14's being N/A.It wouldn't have happened without the nitrous.
I'm into the 13's and my car isn't fast or able to pull times to brag about.
A stock RSX-S isn't going to beat SS/SC stock for stock.
Who cares about the money issue if you spent thousands more on a LS than an old hatch..who cares.A cars a car and you could have went with that or similar instead.
Yes, both cars are slow stock (The SI hatch and the LS) but he did infact get rid of his weak point..the engine.I guess the good think about Cobalts is that you can just get an engine full of potential by just ordering an SS.
I'm into the 13's and my car isn't fast or able to pull times to brag about.
A stock RSX-S isn't going to beat SS/SC stock for stock.
Who cares about the money issue if you spent thousands more on a LS than an old hatch..who cares.A cars a car and you could have went with that or similar instead.
Yes, both cars are slow stock (The SI hatch and the LS) but he did infact get rid of his weak point..the engine.I guess the good think about Cobalts is that you can just get an engine full of potential by just ordering an SS.
i don't see how the 2.2 doesn't have as much potential as a 2.0... but whatever...
Senior Member
Joined: 11-16-05
Posts: 11,137
Likes: 1
From: Central NY
Senior Member
Joined: 04-20-08
Posts: 6,780
Likes: 0
From: .
Haha, apparently Hahn did when they destroked to a 2.0 on there 600hp L61 build.Considering they also had the 2.2 and 2.4 as an option I'm sure GM used the 2.0 for a reason on the "performance" trim. Honestly I don't care either way and I'm not going to argue with you like a teen girl.Infact I'm not even going to check this thread again, say what you want.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: 08-23-08
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
From: strawberry plains, tn
Haha, apparently Hahn did when they destroked to a 2.0 on there 600hp L61 build.Considering they also had the 2.2 and 2.4 as an option I'm sure GM used the 2.0 for a reason on the "performance" trim. Honestly I don't care either way and I'm not going to argue with you like a teen girl.Infact I'm not even going to check this thread again, say what you want.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post