do you know if it was a 6 or 8 mustang?

 

it had a V8

 

good job on that , my wife and i have a 65 mustang 289 its pretty quick but i think i can still beat it, new technology makes a difference

 

The 2.4L SS is probably faster then 75% (I am taking a guess here) of the "muscle cars"--reason being is they had multiple engines available and only the real high hp ones were quick by todays standards.

Of course I am talking stock, with no mods.

 

well this mustang didn't sound stock

 

yeah i saw a tv show do a test with a road runner muscle car or something fast like that against a minivan i think honda, and the minivan won by a few seconds in the road course

 

yeah but muscle cars are made to go fast and straight

 

well in that days standards they were made for handling as well