Called out by a 392 challenger

alerosaint · 2014-06-12 21:43:08

Lol I just want to be able to screw with people :lol:

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 9, 2014 | 02:04 PM

#326

Haven07

Senior Member

Joined: 08-31-12

Posts: 3,154

Likes: 54

From: MD

Lol I just want to be able to screw with people

Oct 9, 2014 | 10:45 PM

#327

colodude18

Senior Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: 01-12-10

Posts: 2,692

Likes: 171

From: Greater Denver Area, Colorado

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzzyruleZ

The SRT 392 has 8.66lbs per HP. My car in its current setup has 6.77lbs per HP. That should give a very good indication of what will happen lol

Mine's at 6.05

Weight really counts in 60-120 runs

Oct 9, 2014 | 11:23 PM

#328

OzzyruleZ

Senior Member

Joined: 02-13-07

Posts: 6,649

Likes: 30

From: Keystone Heights, Fl

That it does. Hell it really counts in acceleration period lol

Oct 10, 2014 | 02:26 PM

#329

alerosaint

Thread Starter

Senior Member

Joined: 08-06-08

Posts: 3,405

Likes: 7

From: Federal Way

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzzyruleZ

I think what I find most humorous is guys buy a muscle car and suddenly they are unbeatable. And then it royally pisses them off when you walk all over them. Then they start with the "well if I mod mine you won't stand a chance" thing. Hop to it I say!

LOL

I'm contemplating throwing my s550 "fish story" in here

Oct 10, 2014 | 02:31 PM

#330

OzzyruleZ

Senior Member

Joined: 02-13-07

Posts: 6,649

Likes: 30

From: Keystone Heights, Fl

You should!

Oct 10, 2014 | 02:35 PM

#331

Terminator2

Senior Member

Joined: 07-25-08

Posts: 12,450

Likes: 6

From: Florida

Quote:

Originally Posted by colodude18

Mine's at 6.05

Weight really counts in 60-120 runs

That is your fwhp to weight ratio. Your approximate crank hp (assuming 530 crank hp (10% loss) and 2900lbs) to weight is 5.47lbs/hp not bad for a little 2.0 with a medium sized turbo (I would not call a EFR 6758 big).