New camaro killed
#152
Senior Member
These are going on the car soon. I cannot wait for the extra 30 whp and 35 wtrq throught the curve I should gain. Not bad for $799 shipped and a PITA install to come.
2011-2012 Mustang 5.0L GT JBA Long Tube Headers / Off-road X-Pipe Combo Kit
#153
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-05-11
Location: DDUUVVAALLL, FL
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Damn my header/OR xpipe combo was like 1300+ but that was bought by the previous owner lmao, sounds great tho, the headers don't do much for power, maybe 4-5hp give or take, but I still think they're worth it, the xpipe is a big power Adder, with a JLT CAI, AR 1 7/8 LTs, Catless xpipe, 3" bullet exhaust and a AED tune I put down 434/405, I'd think your trq numbers would be higher
#154
Senior Member
Damn my header/OR xpipe combo was like 1300+ but that was bought by the previous owner lmao, sounds great tho, the headers don't do much for power, maybe 4-5hp give or take, but I still think they're worth it, the xpipe is a big power Adder, with a JLT CAI, AR 1 7/8 LTs, Catless xpipe, 3" bullet exhaust and a AED tune I put down 434/405, I'd think your trq numbers would be higher
On the subject of longtubes I have spent so many hours doing research and have found differing opinions just like the Boss IM.
One guy on the forums went from catless 3 inch X pipe (lethal offroad X) to a JBA catless shorty 3" X pipe with JBA longtubes and he actually gained over 20 whp and 20 wrtq from just the longtubes!!!. He made another 20 whp on top of that going from 93 to E-85 on his car. The gains seem to depend a lot on the size of the primaries. The factory exhaust ports are 1 7/8" so anything smaller than that is a waste and it depends on tuning just like all the other mods. Many will tell you that larger primaries will sacrifice low end torque but on a high compression, high HP NA car that is BS. I have seen 8-10 whp and 10-15 wrtq differences even in the low end and midrange between using a 1 3/4" and a 1 7/8" (the 1 7/8"made more power across the board).
#155
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-05-11
Location: DDUUVVAALLL, FL
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've heard te LTs doing alot but I've heard more of them not, hard for me to say because I don't know my gains.. The car pretty much had everything on it, get some base line numbers and dyno numbers after the install
#156
Senior Member
You had a buddy you raced with a 5.0 with the same basic mods as you minus LTs and he put down what ~415 whp which is about 20 whp less then you right?
#159
Senior Member
#160
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-05-11
Location: DDUUVVAALLL, FL
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah every car is different, my other buddy's 5.0 with the same tune, same Hpipe as the one that put down 415.. but also a catback(same as mine, 3" dynomax bullet) put down 421whp I believe, different dyno tho
#163
Senior Member
Well after driving around for 2 days back on my stock throttle body I can honestly say there is definitely a throttle response and low end torque difference with the BBK 90mm even on a tuned car. The car feels like it wants to stall easier when I start off around 1200-1500 RPMs with the stock TB. I need to bite the bullet and port the Boss IM to 90 mm to match the TB because the reducer spacer does cause some air turbulance at some throttle openings (the air is forced to travel a non straight path because of the reduction right behind the throttle blade). It causes a whistle (restriction) at certain throttle openings and makes the car a bit sluggish when it is at those throttle openings. I believe with the Boss 302 IM inlet ported to 90 mm from 85 mm and the BBK 90 mm throttle body it will worth at least 10-12 whp (total between the porting the Boss IM and the 90 mm TB) over stock especially with the exhaust done on the car. I am already seeing over 723 CFM which is getting real close to the max flow of the stock throttle body assuming zero restriction.
#164
Junior Member
Join Date: 07-15-09
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey guys since this turned into a 5.0 thread ill post up the video a buddy of mine made this past weekend. I didn't turn off the traction control and esc so when shifting into fourth in the first and third run tc kicks in for a couple seconds and I drop back but I thought he was going to blow my doors off with his mods. I think the grille I have could have made a difference as well.
#165
Senior Member
Hey guys since this turned into a 5.0 thread ill post up the video a buddy of mine made this past weekend. I didn't turn off the traction control and esc so when shifting into fourth in the first and third run tc kicks in for a couple seconds and I drop back but I thought he was going to blow my doors off with his mods. I think the grille I have could have made a difference as well.
2013 Mustang GT vs 2013 Mustang GT - YouTube
2013 Mustang GT vs 2013 Mustang GT - YouTube
#167
Junior Member
Join Date: 07-15-09
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree it has to be really weak. I think it's a 91 hybrid tune from Bama. I really thought he was going to put at least a bus length on me. I have also raced three other 5.0's (unknown mods) and pulled almost a car on all three but they were probably stock too. I should be getting my aed tune soon so hopefully ill be able to pull on him haha.
#168
Senior Member
I will say this I believe the 2013 has a slightly more aggressive tune stock vs the 2011-2012. Typical gains seem to be 8-10 whp less on a tune on a 2013 vs a 2011 or 2012. They both end up around the same whp in the end though because the 2013 makes about 7-8 whp more than a 2011-2012 normally.
#170
Senior Member
Less torque hit in the midrange and heavier car by 500-800 lbs (my base model comes in at 3480 lbs) but with just the Boss IM, Airaid CAI and 93 octane tune it is faster than any LNF on stock turbo even those on E-47 or E-85. 0-60 is 3.6 seconds logged with HP tuners. No 0-100 run yet but I would say it is in the 8.5-9 second range 0-100. Stock 60-100 was 4.89 seconds I have not logged it yet 60-100 since I modded it but it is likely in the 3.89 second 60-100 range currently and likely a 3.4 second 60-100 once I do the full exhaust.
Last edited by Terminator2; 02-09-2013 at 08:49 PM.
#171
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: 02-05-11
Location: DDUUVVAALLL, FL
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree it has to be really weak. I think it's a 91 hybrid tune from Bama. I really thought he was going to put at least a bus length on me. I have also raced three other 5.0's (unknown mods) and pulled almost a car on all three but they were probably stock too. I should be getting my aed tune soon so hopefully ill be able to pull on him haha.
#172
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: 07-24-11
Location: Bradenton, FL.
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Less torque hit in the midrange and heavier car by 500-800 lbs (my base model comes in at 3480 lbs) but with just the Boss IM, Airaid CAI and 93 octane tune it is faster than any LNF on stock turbo even those on E-47 or E-85. 0-60 is 3.6 seconds logged with HP tuners. No 0-100 run yet but I would say it is in the 8.5-9 second range 0-100. Stock 60-100 was 4.89 seconds I have not logged it yet 60-100 since I modded it but it is likely in the 3.89 second 60-100 range currently and likely a 3.4 second 60-100 once I do the full exhaust.
i gotta come see ya again when i get my stuff straight with my car and what i am doing
#173
Senior Member
My longtubes and 3" catless X are on there way to me as we speak. I should have them by friday and hopefully have time to install them in the next couple weeks or so (I work a lot and the Mustang is my DD so I cannot have it down for more than a day) I went with the pypes 1 3/4" to 1 7/8" stepped headers over the JBA 1 7/8" headers. I got them for $800 shipped. Pypes claims 48 whp and 20 wrtq with the headers an X pipe but I believe that was with a mild tune on the car as well but either way I will be happy with even a 25-30 whp gain as my car is already traction limited in 1st and 2nd (spun for a second or so shifting into 3rd last night not just a chirp like sometimes) I could not imagine this car with 3.73s or 4.10s like some have.
2011-2013 Mustang GT 5.0L Pypes Long Tube Headers w/ Off Road X Pipe
2011-2013 Mustang GT 5.0L Pypes Long Tube Headers w/ Off Road X Pipe
Last edited by Terminator2; 02-12-2013 at 09:58 AM.
#175
Senior Member
Yep if the station down the road from work ever gets it in again I will do an E-47 blend on stock injectors, etc. No other E-85 stations within 65 miles each way of me.