SS 2.4 vs. 07' SI
New Member
Joined: 03-04-08
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: byron
if your going to put the "reality" of the ss/sc then be fair and do it for the honda too.
civics are not mid 14 second cars.
i know ss/scs are mid - high 14 s cars mostly,
but you posted the best results for the honda, so do the same for both.
reality ss/sc = mid-high 14
civic si = high 14s low 15s
civics are not mid 14 second cars.
i know ss/scs are mid - high 14 s cars mostly,
but you posted the best results for the honda, so do the same for both.
reality ss/sc = mid-high 14
civic si = high 14s low 15s
Senior Member
Joined: 07-13-05
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 0
From: WI
If any of you guys actually look at the top ten list here it proves the SS/SC is more like a low to mid 14 second car with the right drivers. It's not like the Si forums where you have a guy that supposedly ran a 14.1 and the next guy behind him is at a 14.5-14.6. In the top 10 list here, the times increase from top to bottom in slight increments down the list. Not the massive gaps the Si forums have! I have learned from experiance that a stock Si isn't as close to a stock SS/SC especially since I regularly put 4-5 lengths on any stock Si I have raced. They are quick for an N/A car but not that quick.
Senior Member
Joined: 02-20-06
Posts: 8,913
Likes: 0
From: Ridgefield, NJ
Well, I ran a 14.4 stock (ss/sc) so I'm in the Mid 14 range I guess. BTW Totally cool with that! How many cars can say they run that ish that fast! + With all my bolt ons now... Mid-high 13's!
Senior Member
Joined: 08-22-06
Posts: 7,591
Likes: 1
From: In a house.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post