2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

FTW-k04R vs ZFR In need of turbo swap!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2015, 12:01 PM
  #1151  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
T-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-09
Location: The Desert
Posts: 1,461
Received 89 Likes on 76 Posts
Well, I've decided. F all of this speculation. I'm buying two of them today :-)
Old 02-17-2015, 12:12 PM
  #1152  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,581
Received 839 Likes on 736 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Hmm I have not had this issue specifically mine was on a modded GMS1 write entire I did and I had mine holding 22.5 psi until 6400. I did have my wg rod shortened 3-4 turns though but no nannies were causing it to kick out of boost or anything.
I wonder if he's comparing GMS1 to stock straight up, changing your wg settings and DALs I would expect to effect the boost it holds more than an unknown nanny table. Its been awhile since i've looked at the GMS1 vs stock to see if the DALs are ramped in different or if the wg setting is completely different
Old 02-17-2015, 12:23 PM
  #1153  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ECaulk
I wonder if he's comparing GMS1 to stock straight up, changing your wg settings and DALs I would expect to effect the boost it holds more than an unknown nanny table. Its been awhile since i've looked at the GMS1 vs stock to see if the DALs are ramped in different or if the wg setting is completely different
I figured out why he has that issue and it is so easy to fix it is not even funny.

Look at wg prop max between GMS1 files and stock files and look at the last column stock one is 17.4 psi and the GMS1 is 23.2 psi. If you leave that column 23.2 psi then even if you put in 100% in prop max and 100% in wg duty cycle correction it will not hit 100% wg duty cycle. Why? because desired boost is still limited to 22.5 psi maximum not 23.2 psi! If you change 23.2 to 22.5 or lower in that column the issue is solved. I figured that out about 5 years ago on my car.

Oh yeah and using the stock file optimum engine torque settings in place of the GMS1 settings helps this as well believe it or not.
Old 02-17-2015, 12:34 PM
  #1154  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,581
Received 839 Likes on 736 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
I figured out why he has that issue and it is so easy to fix it is not even funny.

Look at wg prop max between GMS1 files and stock files and look at the last column stock one is 17.4 psi and the GMS1 is 23.2 psi. If you leave that column 23.2 psi then even if you put in 100% in prop max and 100% in wg duty cycle correction it will not hit 100% wg duty cycle. Why? because desired boost is still limited to 22.5 psi maximum not 23.2 psi! If you change 23.2 to 22.5 or lower in that column the issue is solved. I figured that out about 5 years ago on my car.

Oh yeah and using the stock file optimum engine torque settings in place of the GMS1 settings helps this as well believe it or not.
Thats odd that changing the wg prop max down to 22.5 the issue disappears.

I havent touched the OT table for high load, I've done some tweeking to smooth my idle out.
Old 02-17-2015, 12:49 PM
  #1155  
Senior Member
 
KMO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-21-12
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,820
Received 84 Likes on 73 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Man
Well, I've decided. F all of this speculation. I'm buying two of them today :-)
Why are you getting 2?
Old 02-17-2015, 12:51 PM
  #1156  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by ECaulk
Thats odd that changing the wg prop max down to 22.5 the issue disappears.

I havent touched the OT table for high load, I've done some tweeking to smooth my idle out.
It worked for my car. Even before I tweaked my wg rod a little I could hold 22.5 past 6000. Once tweaked I could hold 22.5 until around 6400 almost 6500.
Old 02-17-2015, 12:54 PM
  #1157  
Senior Member
 
KMO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-21-12
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,820
Received 84 Likes on 73 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
It worked for my car. Even before I tweaked my wg rod a little I could hold 22.5 past 6000. Once tweaked I could hold 22.5 until around 6400 almost 6500.
Wow that's crazy I wish I lived at sea level
Old 02-17-2015, 12:56 PM
  #1158  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by KMO43
Wow that's crazy I wish I lived at sea level
Yeah that helps a ton.
Old 02-17-2015, 12:57 PM
  #1159  
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
blueLNFftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-12
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,397
Received 84 Likes on 69 Posts
I am going to tighten my rod.
Any tips for how much to do it?
Old 02-17-2015, 01:01 PM
  #1160  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by blueLNFftw
I am going to tighten my rod.
Any tips for how much to do it?
4-5 turns from factory preset position works well and no surge issues on mine ever.
Old 02-17-2015, 01:07 PM
  #1161  
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
blueLNFftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-22-12
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,397
Received 84 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
4-5 turns from factory preset position works well and no surge issues on mine ever.
Okay. I probably only was able to do like 1/2 a turn on mine when you told me to check it. It was tight so I didnt mess with it much.

I need to pick up a ratcheting combination wrench; that would make it cake to adjust.
Old 02-17-2015, 02:09 PM
  #1162  
Senior Member
 
KMO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-21-12
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,820
Received 84 Likes on 73 Posts
I used a 1/4 in ratchet to loosen the back nut then adjusted by hand the couple turns and tightened the back nut up worked fine
Old 02-17-2015, 02:14 PM
  #1163  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by blueLNFftw
Okay. I probably only was able to do like 1/2 a turn on mine when you told me to check it. It was tight so I didnt mess with it much.

I need to pick up a ratcheting combination wrench; that would make it cake to adjust.
I used a ratchet wrench but a slim 1/4 ratchet would work.
Old 02-17-2015, 02:53 PM
  #1164  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
T-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-09
Location: The Desert
Posts: 1,461
Received 89 Likes on 76 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
Hmm I have not had this issue specifically mine was on a modded GMS1 write entire I did and I had mine holding 22.5 psi until 6400. I did have my wg rod shortened 3-4 turns though but no nannies were causing it to kick out of boost or anything.
I didn't say anything about it kicking anything out of boost. It was simply an observation I noted years ago with my previous RY Sedan. At the time, I didn't have an understanding of the PID tables the way I do now and I believe it was the biggest culprit.


Originally Posted by ECaulk
I wonder if he's comparing GMS1 to stock straight up, changing your wg settings and DALs I would expect to effect the boost it holds more than an unknown nanny table. Its been awhile since i've looked at the GMS1 vs stock to see if the DALs are ramped in different or if the wg setting is completely different
DAL is slightly different, no changes to WG. The major changes for responsiveness came from the Optimum spark changes and the PID tables, from what's viewable.

Originally Posted by Terminator2
I figured out why he has that issue and it is so easy to fix it is not even funny.

Look at wg prop max between GMS1 files and stock files and look at the last column stock one is 17.4 psi and the GMS1 is 23.2 psi. If you leave that column 23.2 psi then even if you put in 100% in prop max and 100% in wg duty cycle correction it will not hit 100% wg duty cycle. Why? because desired boost is still limited to 22.5 psi maximum not 23.2 psi! If you change 23.2 to 22.5 or lower in that column the issue is solved. I figured that out about 5 years ago on my car.

Oh yeah and using the stock file optimum engine torque settings in place of the GMS1 settings helps this as well believe it or not.
Who said anything about me still having this issue? Why the need to be so condescending David? I'm not James here...

And no, regardless of how my X/Y axis columns were labeled, the car carried 100% WG when commanded.

Originally Posted by KMO43
Why are you getting 2?
One is for my car and the other is for my Dad's coupe. Quite the rivalry between the two of us for some time now, since my previous RY sedan and his 1G Eclipse

Originally Posted by ECaulk
Thats odd that changing the wg prop max down to 22.5 the issue disappears.

I havent touched the OT table for high load, I've done some tweeking to smooth my idle out.
I can't speak to that because in my experiences, Prop Max simply works in conjunction with the Prop gain to ramp the signal (boost) in faster/slower depending on how you've setup everything (PID tables). Also, there is power to be gained by messing around with OT high load areas but there is a point of diminished returns vs stability (think on/off switch).
Old 02-17-2015, 03:01 PM
  #1165  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Man
I didn't say anything about it kicking anything out of boost. It was simply an observation I noted years ago with my previous RY Sedan. At the time, I didn't have an understanding of the PID tables the way I do now and I believe it was the biggest culprit.




DAL is slightly different, no changes to WG. The major changes for responsiveness came from the Optimum spark changes and the PID tables, from what's viewable.



Who said anything about me still having this issue? Why the need to be so condescending David? I'm not James here...

And no, regardless of how my X/Y axis columns were labeled, the car carried 100% WG when commanded.


One is for my car and the other is for my Dad's coupe. Quite the rivalry between the two of us for some time now, since my previous RY sedan and his 1G Eclipse



I can't speak to that because in my experiences, Prop Max simply works in conjunction with the Prop gain to ramp the signal (boost) in faster/slower depending on how you've setup everything (PID tables). Also, there is power to be gained by messing around with OT high load areas but there is a point of diminished returns vs stability (think on/off switch).
You are misunderstanding me.
Old 02-17-2015, 03:04 PM
  #1166  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
T-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-09
Location: The Desert
Posts: 1,461
Received 89 Likes on 76 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
You are misunderstanding me.
I figured as much but it's the internet and why not have fun with it?
Old 02-17-2015, 03:07 PM
  #1167  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Man
I figured as much but it's the internet and why not have fun with it?
I am going to blame me coming of as a cocky ******* on the **** I am on not me
Old 02-17-2015, 03:39 PM
  #1168  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,581
Received 839 Likes on 736 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Man
Also, there is power to be gained by messing around with OT high load areas but there is a point of diminished returns vs stability (think on/off switch).
Oh I know there power there, but I'm going to get my EGT installed, switch to e35, and rent a dyno (mustang, none of that unloaded crap) for a day before I go tweeking those tables, and then i'll be able to play around with the different tables and see results
Old 02-18-2015, 06:55 PM
  #1169  
Senior Member
 
SSlobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-22-09
Location: Kathmandu
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Terminator2
I am going to blame me coming of as a cocky ******* on the **** I am on not me
So..........whatcha on, Term?
Old 02-18-2015, 07:05 PM
  #1170  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,581
Received 839 Likes on 736 Posts
Originally Posted by SSlobalt
So..........whatcha on, Term?
it was mentioned in the daily chat a few days ago
Old 02-18-2015, 07:49 PM
  #1171  
Senior Member
 
Terminator2's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-25-08
Location: Florida
Posts: 12,478
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by SSlobalt
So..........whatcha on, Term?
Not really relevant to this thread. Read my fitness thread.
Old 02-19-2015, 02:36 PM
  #1172  
Senior Member
 
SSlobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-22-09
Location: Kathmandu
Posts: 5,989
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
THeres a fitness section on here?
Old 02-19-2015, 02:40 PM
  #1173  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ECaulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-19-10
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 26,581
Received 839 Likes on 736 Posts
Originally Posted by SSlobalt
THeres a fitness section on here?
https://www.cobaltss.net/forums/loun.../index201.html
Old 02-20-2015, 12:30 AM
  #1174  
Senior Member
 
KMO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-21-12
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,820
Received 84 Likes on 73 Posts
So guys I have a couple things to update this thread first of all today I logged my car on 94 not 92 like before with the same tune other then I leaned it out back to normal because I was running rich on my original test because of the 92oct and today I held the 25psi all the way to the 6500 redline like before but flowed 37.95lbs/min on only 11* timing!! I know I still have room to turn up the boost and see what she'll really do but like I said before I'm waiting on my buddy to buy me a new intercooler and put my meth back on before I crank up the boost but for the meantime I raised my rev limiter to 7k so I'll post a log soon of the results for that.

Also I just got off the phone with Matt and he's got a bunch of new updates for the K04r and is getting ready to finally put my mod into production! He has some really good stuff going on I'm trying to get pics and I'll update this thread as soon as I have new info
Old 02-20-2015, 03:12 PM
  #1175  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
T-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-07-09
Location: The Desert
Posts: 1,461
Received 89 Likes on 76 Posts
Yep and my turbos will benefit from the updates :-)

Wouldn't do the "mod" for them though, due to time constraints


Quick Reply: FTW-k04R vs ZFR In need of turbo swap!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 PM.