2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

Going even bigger on the turbo. Share your thoughts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 25, 2012 | 08:00 PM
  #126  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
what do a 400hp supra and an 800hp supra have in common??


they both run 12s.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2012 | 11:24 PM
  #127  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
Originally Posted by Matt M
lol. Most Supra guys with big turbos have HP to spare and could easily give some up for a little quicker spool. In most cases, I bet they could design their setup differently and achieve the same results with much less complication.

There are ways that I could see that concept working well, though. I have an idea how I would set it up. Maybe I'll try it sometime...
Try it with one of the s262. See if you see any difference. It shouldnt be a big deal but since you use a log manifold this could be beneficial.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 08:41 AM
  #128  
blrt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-09
Posts: 750
Likes: 29
From: south west of GTA
Quick spool valve:



By looking at this, can we not put 2 half plates and on each side so flow will be even out? Have the plates at an 45 degree angle fully close so it it will direct flow to the open centres? It will be more complicated or not by having 2 arms and connected to the same wastegate. Hmmm

Last edited by blrt; Dec 26, 2012 at 08:50 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 08:55 AM
  #129  
kdub1492's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 12-07-10
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
All you guys and this quick spool talk...your trans are hating you! lol
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 10:03 AM
  #130  
FF_ace's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-08-06
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
The lag will save ur trans
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 11:30 AM
  #131  
Omnigear's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-15-07
Posts: 13,998
Likes: 1
From: Manama, Bahrain
Originally Posted by kdub1492
All you guys and this quick spool talk...your trans are hating you! lol
If they dont want lag they should have gotten a sc insted of tc

Oh n bc racecar
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 11:36 AM
  #132  
ford's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-19-09
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Originally Posted by Omnigear
If they dont want lag they should have gotten a sc insted of tc

Oh n bc racecar
I guess if we wanted to be slower i could get an s/c.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 12:50 PM
  #133  
Nfamous60's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: 12-04-11
Posts: 3,136
Likes: 1
From: El paso
buy Cmillers 6262
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 12:53 PM
  #134  
kdub1492's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: 12-07-10
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by FF_ace
The lag will save ur trans
Yes I know. Which Is why I said their trans are hatin them with all of this quick spool talk haha
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 05:31 PM
  #135  
blrt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-09
Posts: 750
Likes: 29
From: south west of GTA
Someone go build this. 2 half exhaust plates. Once the WG actuator arm extent, one EP shaft will rotate clock wise and the other will be rotate counter clock. The center will be open and you can decide how big the opening will be at the EP close position. Will this work? I am just throwing this out there.

Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 05:35 PM
  #136  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
or go get a turbo sized to what you'll be doing...
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 05:39 PM
  #137  
prevsrt4owner's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-14-12
Posts: 964
Likes: 1
From: Warner Robins
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
or go get a turbo sized to what you'll be doing...
Yeah, but that negates the notion of common sense.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 05:41 PM
  #138  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
well then they deserve all the lag they get.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 05:49 PM
  #139  
blrt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-16-09
Posts: 750
Likes: 29
From: south west of GTA
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
or go get a turbo sized to what you'll be doing...
Agreed.. if Matt M. can take the LNF past 8000+ rpm so what if your big laggy turbo fully spooled at 4000.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 05:58 PM
  #140  
ford's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-19-09
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
If they made a decent variable vane turbo that was actually reliable that would be cool. I was narrowing down the turbo but if we can get more RPM... that changes everything.






Of course my goals keep changing now. In my head i think "if im going for 600, why not 700?" **** never stops lol.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:05 PM
  #141  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
experience 600 first. it's insane lol.

when i first bought my car that had a 3076 on it, i swore up and down that it was like 400whp after going to it from my 273whp m62. put it on the dyno and it only did 346. and then when zzp did my 600whp build.... omg.... imagine how that felt.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:19 PM
  #142  
Frogstofall's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-30-11
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
experience 600 first. it's insane lol.

when i first bought my car that had a 3076 on it, i swore up and down that it was like 400whp after going to it from my 273whp m62. put it on the dyno and it only did 346. and then when zzp did my 600whp build.... omg.... imagine how that felt.
Considering your car didn't make 600whp until that last 2 secs of your power band I imagine it felt like...


waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiitttt.... WOW, shift

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiitttt... WOW, shift

Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:30 PM
  #143  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
nope lol
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:31 PM
  #144  
ford's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-19-09
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
Originally Posted by EXsoccer1921
experience 600 first. it's insane lol.

when i first bought my car that had a 3076 on it, i swore up and down that it was like 400whp after going to it from my 273whp m62. put it on the dyno and it only did 346. and then when zzp did my 600whp build.... omg.... imagine how that felt.

That is an insane jump in power for sure. Going from 317?(i think thats what it made on trifecta tune) to like 400whp put a smile on my face. Putting the cams and E85 on this turbo made me giggle as i tore ass back to Austin.

Originally Posted by Frogstofall
Considering your car didn't make 600whp until that last 2 secs of your power band I imagine it felt like...


waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiitttt.... WOW, shift

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiitttt... WOW, shift


Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:36 PM
  #145  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
i'm not saying it was soon lol. but it wasn't as late as people make it out to be. and that was on a .70 housing. why do you think i'm on a .55 259 now?

journal bearing turbos. i would say theres no need to go any higher than .55 turbine on these cars. ballbearing i can see a .63 working just fine. but nothing larger. there are turbos out there that will make 700hp or damn near to it on a .63 housing.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:38 PM
  #146  
ford's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-19-09
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas
You have the chart he is referencing? I am curious when you saw full boost. What turbo was that on as well? If possible i would like to have a turbo capable of 600+whp that sees boost by 4k rpm. I know that's asking a lot from a 2.1L.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:50 PM
  #147  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
full boost, 31.5psi, was at about 5,700. with 12psi at about 4,600. and 18psi at about 5,000.

262 .70 a/r is not the way to go thats why we went back to the 259 .55 a/r. i just wish i had a dyno sheet to see the difference in the powerband and what the car actually made.

all i have are videos.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:50 PM
  #148  
Frogstofall's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 07-30-11
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by ford
You have the chart he is referencing? I am curious when you saw full boost. What turbo was that on as well? If possible i would like to have a turbo capable of 600+whp that sees boost by 4k rpm. I know that's asking a lot from a 2.1L.
With a larger EFR or a GTX series turbo and E85, I really think you could have your cake and eat it too. It aint gonna be cheap but we know your wallet is ready to puke the cash so just get it over with so we can see the videos already!!

Have you seriously looked into the GTX 35r series turbos? If you can plot your motor setup on the compressor map of a few different ones, I bet you would be surprised. I would assume the same for the larger EFR but they are so much more difficult to come by it seems.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:52 PM
  #149  
cmiller8006's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 05-29-08
Posts: 6,079
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
I highly doubt it's going to happen. My 5857 spooled at 4-4300 and never dynoed it on the E but prolly 550whp. 6262 will spool at like 4500ish.
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2012 | 06:53 PM
  #150  
EXsoccer1921's Avatar
Senior Member
Platinum Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: 05-04-08
Posts: 36,934
Likes: 2
From: The 405
i'm not like you guys though ford, i'm not worried about spooling on the street at different mph rolls. i do my racing at the track. i spool in first and then its no problem after that.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 AM.