Going even bigger on the turbo. Share your thoughts
lol. Most Supra guys with big turbos have HP to spare and could easily give some up for a little quicker spool. In most cases, I bet they could design their setup differently and achieve the same results with much less complication.
There are ways that I could see that concept working well, though. I have an idea how I would set it up. Maybe I'll try it sometime...
There are ways that I could see that concept working well, though. I have an idea how I would set it up. Maybe I'll try it sometime...
Quick spool valve:

By looking at this, can we not put 2 half plates and on each side so flow will be even out? Have the plates at an 45 degree angle fully close so it it will direct flow to the open centres? It will be more complicated or not by having 2 arms and connected to the same wastegate. Hmmm

By looking at this, can we not put 2 half plates and on each side so flow will be even out? Have the plates at an 45 degree angle fully close so it it will direct flow to the open centres? It will be more complicated or not by having 2 arms and connected to the same wastegate. Hmmm
Last edited by blrt; Dec 26, 2012 at 08:50 AM.
Someone go build this. 2 half exhaust plates. Once the WG actuator arm extent, one EP shaft will rotate clock wise and the other will be rotate counter clock. The center will be open and you can decide how big the opening will be at the EP close position. Will this work? I am just throwing this out there.
If they made a decent variable vane turbo that was actually reliable that would be cool. I was narrowing down the turbo but if we can get more RPM... that changes everything.

Of course my goals keep changing now. In my head i think "if im going for 600, why not 700?" **** never stops lol.

Of course my goals keep changing now. In my head i think "if im going for 600, why not 700?" **** never stops lol.
experience 600 first. it's insane lol.
when i first bought my car that had a 3076 on it, i swore up and down that it was like 400whp after going to it from my 273whp m62. put it on the dyno and it only did 346. and then when zzp did my 600whp build.... omg.... imagine how that felt.
when i first bought my car that had a 3076 on it, i swore up and down that it was like 400whp after going to it from my 273whp m62. put it on the dyno and it only did 346. and then when zzp did my 600whp build.... omg.... imagine how that felt.
experience 600 first. it's insane lol.
when i first bought my car that had a 3076 on it, i swore up and down that it was like 400whp after going to it from my 273whp m62. put it on the dyno and it only did 346. and then when zzp did my 600whp build.... omg.... imagine how that felt.
when i first bought my car that had a 3076 on it, i swore up and down that it was like 400whp after going to it from my 273whp m62. put it on the dyno and it only did 346. and then when zzp did my 600whp build.... omg.... imagine how that felt.
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiitttt.... WOW, shift
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiitttt... WOW, shift
experience 600 first. it's insane lol.
when i first bought my car that had a 3076 on it, i swore up and down that it was like 400whp after going to it from my 273whp m62. put it on the dyno and it only did 346. and then when zzp did my 600whp build.... omg.... imagine how that felt.
when i first bought my car that had a 3076 on it, i swore up and down that it was like 400whp after going to it from my 273whp m62. put it on the dyno and it only did 346. and then when zzp did my 600whp build.... omg.... imagine how that felt.
That is an insane jump in power for sure. Going from 317?(i think thats what it made on trifecta tune) to like 400whp put a smile on my face. Putting the cams and E85 on this turbo made me giggle as i tore ass back to Austin.
i'm not saying it was soon lol. but it wasn't as late as people make it out to be. and that was on a .70 housing. why do you think i'm on a .55 259 now?
journal bearing turbos. i would say theres no need to go any higher than .55 turbine on these cars. ballbearing i can see a .63 working just fine. but nothing larger. there are turbos out there that will make 700hp or damn near to it on a .63 housing.
journal bearing turbos. i would say theres no need to go any higher than .55 turbine on these cars. ballbearing i can see a .63 working just fine. but nothing larger. there are turbos out there that will make 700hp or damn near to it on a .63 housing.
You have the chart he is referencing? I am curious when you saw full boost. What turbo was that on as well? If possible i would like to have a turbo capable of 600+whp that sees boost by 4k rpm. I know that's asking a lot from a 2.1L.
full boost, 31.5psi, was at about 5,700. with 12psi at about 4,600. and 18psi at about 5,000.
262 .70 a/r is not the way to go
thats why we went back to the 259 .55 a/r. i just wish i had a dyno sheet to see the difference in the powerband and what the car actually made.
all i have are videos.
262 .70 a/r is not the way to go
all i have are videos.

Have you seriously looked into the GTX 35r series turbos? If you can plot your motor setup on the compressor map of a few different ones, I bet you would be surprised. I would assume the same for the larger EFR but they are so much more difficult to come by it seems.
i'm not like you guys though ford, i'm not worried about spooling on the street at different mph rolls. i do my racing at the track. i spool in first and then its no problem after that.



