2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

SynapseTurbo's Initial testing 365whp 359wtq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 10:44 PM
  #126  
marcusicp's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-19-08
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by slowswap
Torque does not have to fall past 5250. HP and torque will always cross at this number. It does NOT mean it will fall.
Agreed.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #127  
2K5SS/SC?'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-08-05
Posts: 6,200
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL
Damn this is badass so far. Very jealous sitting here right now.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 12:01 AM
  #128  
hawkeyez's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 02-04-06
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Glenville
Hey synapse did you guys have your turbo balt out tonight 11/07/08 at sears at the Rotterdam Square Mall? I drove by with my SS/SC and I saw a black SS/TC with a front mount intercooler and a bunch of guys standing around with some other cars. Probably would have stopped but I had to get my wife home.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 12:58 AM
  #129  
Tomtwtwtw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-30-06
Posts: 5,489
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Originally Posted by slowswap
Torque does not have to fall past 5250. HP and torque will always cross at this number. It does NOT mean it will fall.
Thank you.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 02:35 AM
  #130  
SynapseTurbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-12-08
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Sw4y1313
Torque always drops at 5250.... Has nothing to do with the turbo.
definately not true. torque drop off can definately be dependent upon the turbo being used. torque drop off varies based on motor efficiency, turbo sizing and efficiency, and other factors. not just a given 5250. most engines run out of breath between 5 and 6k because they aren't efficient enough to keep filling up the cylinders during the intake stroke. the piston moves down so fast the air cant fill the cylinders. this may be due to insufficient cams, portwork, turbo cant supply any more air, exhaust is too restrictive etc. look at honda motors, they almost always have peak torque above 5252.

on a turbocharged platform the engine is relying on the turbo to compress air to fill the cylinders. if the turbo has reached its limitations it can no longer flow any additional air. so as the engine increases in RPM, the engine is still consuming the same amount of air, just faster. assuming the turbo reaches its max at a given rpm, spin the engine 2x faster, and you will have roughly half the torque(assuming the engine is efficient enough to even consume that much air), and about the same horsepower. without more air you can't make more power, unless you increase efficiency.

as you can see in the example below the turbo reaches its maximum flow of 530ftlbs at around 6500rpms. 530ftlbs x 6500rpms and divided by 8800rpm, and the result is 391ftlbs which you can confirm on the dyno graph the motor is making 391 ftlbs at 8800rpm.

what does this all mean? the turbo has reached its maxiumum flow rate of X, and the engine is consuming X 35 percent faster at 8800rpm than at 6500rpm:




thanks,
Mike
Synapse Motorsport Inc.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 02:38 AM
  #131  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
lol guys 5250 has NOTHING to do with torque. the only time 5250rpm's comes into play is when you are talking horsepower. 5250 isn't some magical number.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 02:47 AM
  #132  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
its 5252.

:P

please continue.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 03:04 AM
  #133  
SportredSS's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-08
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Phx. Az
Yeah, I don't like that power cure, not good for the street, track yes. This little turbo should be making boost almost instantly!!! What's wrong here? As for power, this was a rather light gain in whp. As for wtq, there are some people here with all the bolt-ons and the intercooler running nearly 345 wtq and 300whp in a curve that's much more near the stock curve. Running above 7500rpm like this, you're going to need a cam if engine longevity is a factor at all too.

Bring the power curves up to near stock between 2000-3800rpms and then you'll have a good package. I'd like to see about 375-390 whp and 385+ wtq. For such small gains in tq and modest in whp, This definately needs fine tuning. Keep up the good work.

Lots of lag down low and more of it on top in tq!!! my, my i hope this thing gets a really good and like others have said, CORRECT tune.

Last edited by SportredSS; Nov 8, 2008 at 03:04 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 03:19 AM
  #134  
SynapseTurbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-12-08
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by SportredSS
Yeah, I don't like that power cure, not good for the street, track yes. This little turbo should be making boost almost instantly!!! What's wrong here? As for power, this was a rather light gain in whp. As for wtq, there are some people here with all the bolt-ons and the intercooler running nearly 345 wtq and 300whp in a curve that's much more near the stock curve. Running above 7500rpm like this, you're going to need a cam if engine longevity is a factor at all too.

Bring the power curves up to near stock between 2000-3800rpms and then you'll have a good package. I'd like to see about 375-390 whp and 385+ wtq. For such small gains in tq and modest in whp, This definately needs fine tuning. Keep up the good work.

Lots of lag down low and more of it on top in tq!!! my, my i hope this thing gets a really good and like others have said, CORRECT tune.
Yes the turbo isn't the largest turbo by any means, but it is for a fact larger than the stock turbo, and as such it is going to spool up later, thats just physics. we are also packaging the kit with a tubular manifold not a cast manifold, meant for more upper rpm power. we are more than happy with the way the turbo responded down low. the turbo is spooling up way faster than on any other 2.0l application we have ever seen. the videos will shed a little more light on the situation.

We are very excited about continuing the development, and appreciate everyones input on the kit.

Thanks,
Mike
Synapse Motorsport Inc.
518-261-1790
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 03:25 AM
  #135  
berto's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-30-07
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfiled,CA
DAMN AWSOME WORK YOU GUYS
YEAH TRY TO MAKE IT A KIT,I HAVE SOMEONE THAT CAN TUNE IT ON A MUSTANG DYNO
I LOVE THE PIPING ON THE SS/TC's ENGINE BAY...LOOKS BETTER THAN PLASTIC
AND I LOVE THE BOV!!!
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 03:30 AM
  #136  
Maven's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-25-05
Posts: 7,661
Likes: 7
From: Southern New Jersey
Originally Posted by SportredSS
Yeah, I don't like that power cure, not good for the street, track yes. This little turbo should be making boost almost instantly!!! What's wrong here? As for power, this was a rather light gain in whp. As for wtq, there are some people here with all the bolt-ons and the intercooler running nearly 345 wtq and 300whp in a curve that's much more near the stock curve. Running above 7500rpm like this, you're going to need a cam if engine longevity is a factor at all too.

Bring the power curves up to near stock between 2000-3800rpms and then you'll have a good package. I'd like to see about 375-390 whp and 385+ wtq. For such small gains in tq and modest in whp, This definately needs fine tuning. Keep up the good work.

Lots of lag down low and more of it on top in tq!!! my, my i hope this thing gets a really good and like others have said, CORRECT tune.
What are you talking about? The stock setup makes 260kbs tq at 2800rpm and it slowly ftapes off to 200 near redline, and makes 240hp at around 5600.

This setup is making 260lbs by 3400 and climbs all the way to 380 @ 4200!!!!(and it doesnt ever drop below 300 after that) Horsepower passes stock near 3400rpm and 160hp and just goes on forever after that, peaking at what looks like 360hp!

Thats a gain of 120lb tq and 120hp, How is that small gains? thats like putting an L61 under the hood along side the LNF



I think this is truly awesome work, yeah there appears to be a sacrifice of some power at lower speeds, bu the mid range punch of this setup is amazing, and I would be smiling with just half of what this is putting out
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:02 AM
  #137  
SynapseTurbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-12-08
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by hawkeyez
Hey synapse did you guys have your turbo balt out tonight 11/07/08 at sears at the Rotterdam Square Mall? I drove by with my SS/SC and I saw a black SS/TC with a front mount intercooler and a bunch of guys standing around with some other cars. Probably would have stopped but I had to get my wife home.
We sure did, we were shooting some footage for you guys!
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:03 AM
  #138  
steddy2112's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-08-06
Posts: 25,520
Likes: 3
From: Newark DE
Vids of my future set up.

Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:05 AM
  #139  
SynapseTurbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-12-08
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by steddy2112
Vids of my future set up.

We also rev'd it out on the dyno to 6500 yestarday and made 372whp 385tq, all without the map clamped!
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #140  
steddy2112's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-08-06
Posts: 25,520
Likes: 3
From: Newark DE
Stop man.



Because...I will work so much overtime just to get this.

Just out of blatant curiousity...how is the gas mileage out of boost?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:12 AM
  #141  
SynapseTurbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-12-08
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by steddy2112
Stop man.



Because...I will work so much overtime just to get this.

Just out of blatant curiousity...how is the gas mileage out of boost?

Gas mileage out of boost is just like stock, but we haven't seen to much "out of boost" driving since we put this setup on, lol.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:15 AM
  #142  
steddy2112's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-08-06
Posts: 25,520
Likes: 3
From: Newark DE
Stock.

This is almost too good to be true.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:16 AM
  #143  
jimbos'ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: 10-09-05
Posts: 4,624
Likes: 0
From: Killeen,TX
do you guys have pics of the manifold you made?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:19 AM
  #144  
steddy2112's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-08-06
Posts: 25,520
Likes: 3
From: Newark DE
Yeah they posted it awhile ago...lettme see if I can fish it up
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:20 AM
  #145  
SynapseTurbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-12-08
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by jimbos'ss
do you guys have pics of the manifold you made?







Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:20 AM
  #146  
steddy2112's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-08-06
Posts: 25,520
Likes: 3
From: Newark DE
Synapse fail

Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #147  
SynapseTurbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-12-08
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by steddy2112
Synapse fail

Fixed, lol.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:33 AM
  #148  
06blackg85ss's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 04-22-06
Posts: 15,211
Likes: 20
From: New York
very nice man, I'm watching this one intently.... gotta see what my competition will be on the street lol.


also as for peak tq numbers, mine falls in about 5252rpm also. 378 or 400wtq depending on what boost I'm running.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:39 AM
  #149  
40rty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-11-08
Posts: 3,888
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by SynapseTurbo
We also rev'd it out on the dyno to 6500 yestarday and made 372whp 385tq, all without the map clamped!
Wow, 372whp! What changes or fine tuning did you do to achiieve this? Also, when driving tell us about how the transmission feels, you think its putting up with the power well?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2008 | 08:43 AM
  #150  
SynapseTurbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-12-08
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by 40rty
Wow, 372whp! What changes or fine tuning did you do to achiieve this? Also, when driving tell us about how the transmission feels, you think its putting up with the power well?
No changes, just some more fine tuning. We need to get a larger wastegate actuator and tq should hold out a little better as boost was dropping a little bit up top. The tranny so far loves it!
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM.