2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

SynapseTurbo's Initial testing 365whp 359wtq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #101  
psychophyr's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-22-08
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by 06black
you don't know how power is calculated do you.......

horse power is a function or torque and RPM.

as you can see there, power climbs all the way to redline, with the curves both intersecting at 5252rpm as per expectations, and math.

the torque curves drops as rpm climbs because its inverse the RPM count.

quite simple my dear man.

Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 03:50 PM
  #102  
cakeeater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-17-07
Posts: 9,378
Likes: 0
From: right behind you.
hp = torque*rpm/5252.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #103  
lewisb13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-07
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
From: Home: Utica, MI Current Location: Mobile, Alabama
Originally Posted by Runnerdown
Its not the compressor wheel, there is a graph of a gt35r in another thread that drops tq just as hard
The 35r has a way bigger turbine wheel. Im talking about small turbine, big compressor, this engine would love that.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 04:19 PM
  #104  
steddy2112's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 05-08-06
Posts: 25,520
Likes: 3
From: Newark DE
Tasty...
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #105  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by lewisb13
The 35r has a way bigger turbine wheel. Im talking about small turbine, big compressor, this engine would love that.
thats the recipe for any "street car" with big power admirations.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 04:26 PM
  #106  
lewisb13's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-30-07
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
From: Home: Utica, MI Current Location: Mobile, Alabama
Originally Posted by 06black
thats the recipe for any "street car" with big power admirations.
True that. I think if they would keep their current turbine size the same and increase the size of the compressor, theyd have a "mostly" stock powerband with the added boost in there. Just my 02
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #107  
Terminator2's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 07-25-08
Posts: 12,450
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
Still falls on it's face after 5500 though...... hmmmmmm
The stock head and cams are probably holding it back a little. Good numbers, but tune needs some tweaking no doubt.

It is breathing through their 3" downpipe but still has the stock 2.5" exhaust switching to 3-3.5" will show decent gains in the top end. what troubles me though is the loses down low hopefully they will be able to fine tune to help low end power.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 04:58 PM
  #108  
1WhiteSSTC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 06-23-08
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
Still falls on it's face after 5500 though...... hmmmmmm
just wait till steve gets there and does some extra fine tuning on it
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 05:18 PM
  #109  
Baldturbofreak's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-09-08
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Honeoye,ny
Actually a bigger compressor would likely exacerbate the turbo lag seen here. It's a lower trim,bigger turbine that would benefit most here. It would reduce the turbine inlet pressure considereably, generating pressure sooner due to the higher turbine efficiency.
With that nice header they got there, they would move much closer to the coveted positive MIP/TIP ratio, where for a narrow band there is more intake then exhaust manifold pressure. THis nets huge torque returns and can reduce egt's in a DI motor since most fuel is injected during intake only and a small amount during the compression stroke if your really stuffin' the lbs/min thru there.

We dont have full control yet but changing the beginning of the injection event to happen later would allow air only to bypass to the turbine during certain ranges. reducing EGt's.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 05:20 PM
  #110  
peachpuff's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-14-08
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 1
From: around the world
Originally Posted by Runnerdown
I wish we could we are waiting on Hptuners software revision for that.
The currenty version allows you to increase the rev limiter, just increase oil temp limit, trans limp, transiant limit, normal and short incr in fuel control>fuel cutoff.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #111  
Tomtwtwtw's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-30-06
Posts: 5,489
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Originally Posted by 06black
basically as RPM climbs, torque past 5252 will always drop.
I'm sure you meant to say something different than that. Otherwise a Honda Si engine couldn't have peak torque at over 6k rpm.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 06:28 PM
  #112  
SynapseTurbo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: 06-12-08
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by peachpuff
The currenty version allows you to increase the rev limiter, just increase oil temp limit, trans limp, transiant limit, normal and short incr in fuel control>fuel cutoff.
Thanks, raised, time to hit the dyno again tomorrow.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 07:12 PM
  #113  
Edubs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-01-06
Posts: 4,976
Likes: 2
From: West Coast, FL
Originally Posted by Tomtwtwtw
Originally Posted by 06black
basically as RPM climbs, torque past 5252 will always drop.
I'm sure you meant to say something different than that. Otherwise a Honda Si engine couldn't have peak torque at over 6k rpm.
I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 09:29 PM
  #114  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by Tomtwtwtw
I'm sure you meant to say something different than that. Otherwise a Honda Si engine couldn't have peak torque at over 6k rpm.
notice i said its all related to how the engine builds power past that point.

the VE of that motor becomes MUCH greater in that rev section due to the cam change over.

VARY few engines do such a thing.

Originally Posted by Baldturbofreak
Actually a bigger compressor would likely exacerbate the turbo lag seen here. It's a lower trim,bigger turbine that would benefit most here. It would reduce the turbine inlet pressure considereably, generating pressure sooner due to the higher turbine efficiency.
With that nice header they got there, they would move much closer to the coveted positive MIP/TIP ratio, where for a narrow band there is more intake then exhaust manifold pressure. THis nets huge torque returns and can reduce egt's in a DI motor since most fuel is injected during intake only and a small amount during the compression stroke if your really stuffin' the lbs/min thru there.

We dont have full control yet but changing the beginning of the injection event to happen later would allow air only to bypass to the turbine during certain ranges. reducing EGt's.
the larger turbine would require more shaft inertia to "come up" thus requiring more energy, while i agree with the trim note, the larger size turbine wouldn't benefit here.

i'd much rather see a 4-4.5mm bump in compressor wheel size for air flow Vs a 6mm jump in turbine size for efficiency. (those are just common size jumps from where they are now)

also, a lager comp wheel could be attached to the 28r CHRA shaft, if you bump the size of the turbine / the motor of the turbo i'd bet shaft size would have to jump to sustain the rotational forces that this larger turbine would generate.

This would require even more energy. not only from the larger shaft, but from the larger barring race's (sp?) as well.

if i missed something here, please let me know, you seem educated on the topic and I'm always game to pick things up.

Originally Posted by 1WhiteSSTC
just wait till steve gets there and does some extra fine tuning on it
yea, thats just what they need now....

ugh.

Last edited by 06black; Nov 6, 2008 at 09:29 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #115  
Baldturbofreak's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: 10-09-08
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: Honeoye,ny
We shouln't jack this fella's thread, but if you want to move it to a new one I always love talking turbo tech.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #116  
AaronHHRSS's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 10-21-08
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Houston
This is very promising. Still, I'd like to see it spool sooner.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 10:33 PM
  #117  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
Originally Posted by Baldturbofreak
We shouln't jack this fella's thread, but if you want to move it to a new one I always love talking turbo tech.
good call.

my bad OP.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 12:41 AM
  #118  
hawkeyez's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 02-04-06
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Glenville
Nice numbers guys.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 11:08 AM
  #119  
boostking's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-28-07
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: columbus
any updates with some more rpm.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 11:54 AM
  #120  
40rty's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-11-08
Posts: 3,888
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
So for the torque to go up some are you going to have to change out the camshaft?
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #121  
06black's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-13-05
Posts: 5,733
Likes: 1
From: the glove
no no no.

Just like I was saying before, tweak out the cam timeing in a specific mannor and u can spool a large turbo vary quickly.

Vvt and turbos go hand-in-hand.

I went over the basics of what to do in a preveious post.

If these guys keep it up, they will have THE kit to buy, simply because tweaking the cam timeing ontop of proper ign adv and fuel will give them set ups that make more power and respond quicker then the guys who sell a kit with a tune that's not optimized.

Kudo's to synapse once again!!!

Like I said before, can phase, cam phase, cam phase!!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 01:17 PM
  #122  
Psykostevo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-20-06
Posts: 6,910
Likes: 6
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by camarokiller
I lol'd when i saw who the tuner was
I have not yet tuned this car, this was tuned by their in-house tuner up to this point.

Originally Posted by 1badBlueberrySC
Still falls on it's face after 5500 though...... hmmmmmm
No it doesn't appear to fall on it's face. Torque falls off after 5,250 on almost all cars because of the formula used to calculate hp etc. It was still making power up to the top of the chart.

Last edited by Psykostevo; Nov 7, 2008 at 01:17 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #123  
2JZ4ME's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: 06-10-08
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: NY
I think you'll be okay here, they have a thin candy shell. 'Surprised you didn't know that.
LOL


Torque falls off after 5,250 on almost all cars because of the formula used to calculate hp etc. It was still making power up to the top of the chart.
Ehhh Neeoope. Torque drops... Because the intake mach number starts to get much too high. "runs out of breath"
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 08:32 PM
  #124  
Sw4y1313's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-25-06
Posts: 1,860
Likes: 0
From: USAG Stuttgart, GER
Originally Posted by 2JZ4ME
LOL




Ehhh Neeoope. Torque drops... Because the intake mach number starts to get much too high. "runs out of breath"
Torque always drops at 5250.... Has nothing to do with the turbo.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2008 | 08:36 PM
  #125  
slowswap's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 09-25-08
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
From: Depew, NY
Torque does not have to fall past 5250. HP and torque will always cross at this number. It does NOT mean it will fall.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 PM.