2.0L LNF Performance Tech 260hp and 260 lb-ft of torque Turbocharged tuner version.

ZZP Builds The Best LNF Mod Ever!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 02:44 PM
  #376  
PrincessTurbo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-27-09
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 1
From: In the mountains
Originally Posted by Matt M
Same as the last dyno pull, so just under 500. But that would be the corrected power. The street doesn't correct the power. should be about 525 uncorrected at this boost. It has dyno'd about 50 higher.
Do me a favor and elaborate on the differences or feelings about this turbo vs the ZZP 256 kit

Mostly I just want to know about the drive ability and your impressions if you care to share that..

I don't want you to incriminate your own product but it is what it is .. Not too many people are probably going to be interested in a whole kit now due to this, unless they want over 550WHP correct?
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 02:45 PM
  #377  
InfraRedline's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 08-22-08
Posts: 7,177
Likes: 6
From: Alpharetta, GA
This kinda makes me wanna buy my friends stock TC manifolds and get this turbo
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 03:17 PM
  #378  
soundjunky's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 05-26-09
Posts: 13,656
Likes: 47
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by rallycobalt06
someone really needs to perform some maintenance to their vehicle.......... Service Air Bag........ Low Coolant....... Low Fuel...... Change Oil Soon.........

ok - you made me watch the vids...
Matt, that car sounds mean!
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 08:51 PM
  #379  
Fastgti69's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-05-11
Posts: 2,570
Likes: 1
From: Encino,Ca
Can you guys do Vbox runs for 60-130 mph pulls?
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 09:50 PM
  #380  
raver0789's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 01-26-10
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
PrincessTurbo:

The new EFR turbos are amazing. The best turbos in the world for performance cars.

The s256 is great at providing power, but there will be lots of lag.

The efr turbo has a quick ass spool time, and provides big power as well.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 10:31 PM
  #381  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by raver0789
PrincessTurbo:

The new EFR turbos are amazing. The best turbos in the world for performance cars.

The s256 is great at providing power, but there will be lots of lag.

The efr turbo has a quick ass spool time, and provides big power as well.
Pretty much. The 256 doesn't feel laggy, but it doesn't respond like a stock turbo. The EFR 54mm does respond like stock.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2011 | 10:38 PM
  #382  
Mike_peperni's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: 03-20-09
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Wow... thats impressive!

What kind of trap speed would you estimate out of this setup on the track?
Im pretty much speechless after seeing those vids... look like mine ...on ice!

Nice works guys
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 12:52 AM
  #383  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Mike_peperni
Wow... thats impressive!

What kind of trap speed would you estimate out of this setup on the track?
Im pretty much speechless after seeing those vids... look like mine ...on ice!

Nice works guys
It should trap around 130-132.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 01:03 AM
  #384  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Matt M
It should trap around 130-132.
Little off topic question:
With around 400/420 WHP dialed in with this turbo, what are the implications for a stock tranny? That would be my prime concern, given the stock internals are still safe at this level.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 01:37 AM
  #385  
JustACobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-22-11
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
i thought it was making closer to 500 hp. does it have a stock tranny? i get worried about mine and im just under 400whp
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 02:18 AM
  #386  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by JustACobalt
i thought it was making closer to 500 hp. does it have a stock tranny? i get worried about mine and im just under 400whp
That's my point...many here are looking to use this mod with *only* 400-425 WHP in mind.
Add the clutch to handle that and it's all goin' into tranny land. All those looking to bolt this on for another 100 WHP might want to think about that..I know I will.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 04:32 PM
  #387  
Stamina's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 02-09-09
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 5
From: Tejas
Well ZZP sells new, used, and beefed up F35 trannys, so they thought that out well. lol

It's like a company that sells the poison and the antidote. Genius.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 04:56 PM
  #388  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Stamina
Well ZZP sells new, used, and beefed up F35 trannys, so they thought that out well. lol

It's like a company that sells the poison and the antidote. Genius.
Yeah.. it seems people here think they can bolt on 400HP+ without thouching the tranny....the STOCK tranny will not hold over 400 FT lbs for long..no way. SO...for all those with a hard on for this mod....prepare to get a DOG BOX
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 07:22 PM
  #389  
gone_in_10_sec's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 10-05-10
Posts: 805
Likes: 1
From: A.B.E. PA & Jacksonville FL
Originally Posted by Stamina
Well ZZP sells new, used, and beefed up F35 trannys, so they thought that out well. lol

It's like a company that sells the poison and the antidote. Genius.
Neo, the blue pill or the red pill..

Originally Posted by JustACobalt
i thought it was making closer to 500 hp. does it have a stock tranny? i get worried about mine and im just under 400whp
I touch 500tq but my clutch doesn't like it especially doin a digg at 5500..
the smell of kevlar suks..

Originally Posted by ronn
Yeah.. it seems people here think they can bolt on 400HP+ without thouching the tranny....the STOCK tranny will not hold over 400 FT lbs for long..no way. SO...for all those with a hard on for this mod....prepare to get a DOG BOX
I want ZZP F35 option 3 tranny but the problem is it's months away from even getting produced or tested.. and anyone thinking of getting the EFR turbo and looking to go over 550-600 whp - just spend another $2k for new tranny..
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 10:50 PM
  #390  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by gone_in_10_sec
and anyone thinking of getting the EFR turbo and looking to go over 550-600 whp - just spend another $2k for new tranny..
Better make that 400+ WHP
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 11:24 PM
  #391  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by ronn
Yeah.. it seems people here think they can bolt on 400HP+ without thouching the tranny....the STOCK tranny will not hold over 400 FT lbs for long..no way. SO...for all those with a hard on for this mod....prepare to get a DOG BOX
The stock trans holds up fine at 400-425whp and 375-400 ft lbs. There are lots of people making that kind of power on the stock trans without issues.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2011 | 11:30 PM
  #392  
Omnigear's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 12-15-07
Posts: 13,998
Likes: 1
From: Manama, Bahrain
how many miles have you put on the turbo matt?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 12:24 PM
  #393  
RooTBeeR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 02-18-07
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, Ca
Originally Posted by Omnigear
how many miles have you put on the turbo matt?
well the cars odometer thinks its gone farther than the car has actually moved...wheels spin is a bitch
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 01:41 PM
  #394  
Matt M's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
 
Joined: 06-03-08
Posts: 4,169
Likes: 8
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Originally Posted by Omnigear
how many miles have you put on the turbo matt?
Not a lot yet. E85 in this cold weather doesn't make for easy starting. Once the weather warms up, I will be driving the car more often.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 02:24 PM
  #395  
JustACobalt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: 02-22-11
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
wow i know im over 400wtq and stock trans. does this mean it wouldnt be safe to run like this for a long period of time?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 04:07 PM
  #396  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by JustACobalt
wow i know im over 400wtq and stock trans. does this mean it wouldnt be safe to run like this for a long period of time?
The stock tranny was rated for 260 Ft lbs *maximum* (that's what literature says) to FLYWHEEL...you prolly have 425 Ft lbs FLYWHEEL. Yes...they have a safety margin built in, but it's NOT another 160 Ft lbs! Just my take...if you're over 350-370 Ft lbs to the WHEELS, you're asking for trouble.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 04:13 PM
  #397  
RooTBeeR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: 02-18-07
Posts: 14,089
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, Ca
Originally Posted by ronn
The stock tranny was rated for 260 Ft lbs *maximum* (that's what literature says) to FLYWHEEL...you prolly have 425 Ft lbs FLYWHEEL. Yes...they have a safety margin built in, but it's NOT another 160 Ft lbs! Just my take...if you're over 350-370 Ft lbs to the WHEELS, you're asking for trouble.
well if gm made a gms1 kit that puts you up to 300(ish)tq to the wheels then im sure they know that the tranny will easily hold at least 300(flywheel), not just 260(flywheel)
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 04:52 PM
  #398  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by RooTBeeR
well if gm made a gms1 kit that puts you up to 300(ish)tq to the wheels then im sure they know that the tranny will easily hold at least 300(flywheel), not just 260(flywheel)
True...that's maybe 280 Ft lbs to the wheels. Like I said, anything over 350-370 Ft lbs to the WHEELS is problematic. This turbo will put you well over that....
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 05:22 PM
  #399  
09BlueBaltSS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 05-13-09
Posts: 2,951
Likes: 0
From: Davie, Fl
I think the tranny is capable of reliably handling 400+ tq. The problem lies in the user. People get tranny mounts and a stronger clutch then want to keep shifting aggressively. Once you remove all the "give" in the drive line guess whats going to fail. my .02
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2011 | 05:37 PM
  #400  
ronn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: 09-30-09
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by 09BlueBaltSS
I think the tranny is capable of reliably handling 400+ tq. The problem lies in the user. People get tranny mounts and a stronger clutch then want to keep shifting aggressively. Once you remove all the "give" in the drive line guess whats going to fail. my .02
What do you mean by *capable*? Sure, it can handle that torque for a while, but at some point it WILL succumb to the excessive forces. Let me ask you this...at what point then, is the tranny being stressed? Common sense tells me a tranny *rated* around 240 ft lbs WHEEL torque is good for another 50% MAX as a margin of safety. Ya, I pulled that outa my ****...but it makes good sense to me. You can't use a *forgiving* clutch with that power..certainly not stock. That alone will transmit more stress and you can't do anything about it. All that torque has to go some where...and that's to the tranny, axels and wheels. You wanna roll the dice at 400 ft lbs on a stock tranny? Go for it.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 PM.